scholarly journals An Evaluation of Executive Control Function and Its Relationship with Driving Performance

Sensors ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 1763
Author(s):  
Lirong Yan ◽  
Tiantian Wen ◽  
Jiawen Zhang ◽  
Le Chang ◽  
Yi Wang ◽  
...  

The driver’s attentional state is a significant human factor in traffic safety. The executive control process is a crucial sub−function of attention. To explore the relationship between the driver’s driving performance and executive control function, a total of 35 healthy subjects were invited to take part in a simulated driving experiment and a task−cuing experiment. The subjects were divided into three groups according to their driving performance (aberrant driving behaviors, including lapses and errors) by the clustering method. Then the performance efficiency and electroencephalogram (EEG) data acquired in the task−cuing experiment were compared among the three groups. The effect of group, task transition types and cue−stimulus intervals (CSIs) were statistically analyzed by using the repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the post hoc simple effect analysis. The subjects with lower driving error rates had better executive control efficiency as indicated by the reaction time (RT) and error rate in the task−cuing experiment, which was related with their better capability to allocate the available attentional resources, to express the external stimuli and to process the information in the nervous system, especially the fronto−parietal network. The activation degree of the frontal area fluctuated, and of the parietal area gradually increased along with the increase of CSI, which implied the role of the frontal area in task setting reconstruction and working memory maintaining, and of the parietal area in stimulus−response (S−R) mapping expression. This research presented evidence of the close relationship between executive control functions and driving performance.

2002 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 377-405 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald R. Royall ◽  
Edward C. Lauterbach ◽  
Jeffrey L. Cummings ◽  
Allison Reeve ◽  
Teresa A. Rummans ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kaho Tsumura ◽  
Reiko Shintaki ◽  
Masaki Takeda ◽  
Junichi Chikazoe ◽  
Kiyoshi Nakahara ◽  
...  

Response inhibition is a primary executive control function that allows the withholding of inappropriate responses, and requires appropriate perception of the external environment to achieve a behavioral goal. It remains unclear, however, how response inhibition is achieved when goal-relevant information involves perceptual uncertainty. Twenty-six human participants of both sexes performed a go/no-go task where visually presented random-dot motion stimuli involved perceptual uncertainties. The right inferior frontal cortex (rIFC) was involved in response inhibition, and the middle temporal (MT) region showed greater activity when dot motions involved less uncertainty. A neocortical temporal region in the superior temporal sulcus (STS) specifically showed greater activity during response inhibition in more perceptually certain trials. In this STS region, activity was greater when response inhibition was successful than when it failed. Directional effective connectivity analysis revealed that in more coherent trials, the MT and STS regions showed enhanced connectivity to the rIFC, whereas in less coherent trials, the signal direction was reversed. These results suggest that a reversible fronto-temporal functional network guides response inhibition under perceptual uncertainty, and in this network, perceptual information in the MT is converted to control information in the rIFC via STS, enabling achievement of response inhibition.


1999 ◽  
Vol 13 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. S69-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gustavo C. Román ◽  
Donald R. Royall

2003 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 307-314 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles H. Hillman ◽  
Erin M. Snook ◽  
Gerald J. Jerome

2002 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. S94
Author(s):  
C H. Hillman ◽  
A Belopolsky ◽  
E M. Snook ◽  
A F. Kramer ◽  
E McAuley

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document