scholarly journals Empirical Study of Software Defect Prediction: A Systematic Mapping

Symmetry ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 212 ◽  
Author(s):  
Le Son ◽  
Nakul Pritam ◽  
Manju Khari ◽  
Raghvendra Kumar ◽  
Pham Phuong ◽  
...  

Software defect prediction has been one of the key areas of exploration in the domain of software quality. In this paper, we perform a systematic mapping to analyze all the software defect prediction literature available from 1995 to 2018 using a multi-stage process. A total of 156 studies are selected in the first step, and the final mapping is conducted based on these studies. The ability of a model to learn from data that does not come from the same project or organization will help organizations that do not have sufficient training data or are going to start work on new projects. The findings of this research are useful not only to the software engineering domain, but also to the empirical studies, which mainly focus on symmetry as they provide steps-by-steps solutions for questions raised in the article.

2020 ◽  
pp. 1577-1597
Author(s):  
Mohammed Akour ◽  
Wasen Yahya Melhem

This article describes how classification methods on software defect prediction is widely researched due to the need to increase the software quality and decrease testing efforts. However, findings of past researches done on this issue has not shown any classifier which proves to be superior to the other. Additionally, there is a lack of research that studies the effects and accuracy of genetic programming on software defect prediction. To find solutions for this problem, a comparative software defect prediction experiment between genetic programming and neural networks are performed on four datasets from the NASA Metrics Data repository. Generally, an interesting degree of accuracy is detected, which shows how the metric-based classification is useful. Nevertheless, this article specifies that the application and usage of genetic programming is highly recommended due to the detailed analysis it provides, as well as an important feature in this classification method which allows the viewing of each attributes impact in the dataset.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 4793
Author(s):  
Cong Pan ◽  
Minyan Lu ◽  
Biao Xu

Deep learning-based software defect prediction has been popular these days. Recently, the publishing of the CodeBERT model has made it possible to perform many software engineering tasks. We propose various CodeBERT models targeting software defect prediction, including CodeBERT-NT, CodeBERT-PS, CodeBERT-PK, and CodeBERT-PT. We perform empirical studies using such models in cross-version and cross-project software defect prediction to investigate if using a neural language model like CodeBERT could improve prediction performance. We also investigate the effects of different prediction patterns in software defect prediction using CodeBERT models. The empirical results are further discussed.


Symmetry ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. 1147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdullateef O. Balogun ◽  
Shuib Basri ◽  
Saipunidzam Mahamad ◽  
Said J. Abdulkadir ◽  
Malek A. Almomani ◽  
...  

Feature selection (FS) is a feasible solution for mitigating high dimensionality problem, and many FS methods have been proposed in the context of software defect prediction (SDP). Moreover, many empirical studies on the impact and effectiveness of FS methods on SDP models often lead to contradictory experimental results and inconsistent findings. These contradictions can be attributed to relative study limitations such as small datasets, limited FS search methods, and unsuitable prediction models in the respective scope of studies. It is hence critical to conduct an extensive empirical study to address these contradictions to guide researchers and buttress the scientific tenacity of experimental conclusions. In this study, we investigated the impact of 46 FS methods using Naïve Bayes and Decision Tree classifiers over 25 software defect datasets from 4 software repositories (NASA, PROMISE, ReLink, and AEEEM). The ensuing prediction models were evaluated based on accuracy and AUC values. Scott–KnottESD and the novel Double Scott–KnottESD rank statistical methods were used for statistical ranking of the studied FS methods. The experimental results showed that there is no one best FS method as their respective performances depends on the choice of classifiers, performance evaluation metrics, and dataset. However, we recommend the use of statistical-based, probability-based, and classifier-based filter feature ranking (FFR) methods, respectively, in SDP. For filter subset selection (FSS) methods, correlation-based feature selection (CFS) with metaheuristic search methods is recommended. For wrapper feature selection (WFS) methods, the IWSS-based WFS method is recommended as it outperforms the conventional SFS and LHS-based WFS methods.


2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 32-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed Akour ◽  
Wasen Yahya Melhem

This article describes how classification methods on software defect prediction is widely researched due to the need to increase the software quality and decrease testing efforts. However, findings of past researches done on this issue has not shown any classifier which proves to be superior to the other. Additionally, there is a lack of research that studies the effects and accuracy of genetic programming on software defect prediction. To find solutions for this problem, a comparative software defect prediction experiment between genetic programming and neural networks are performed on four datasets from the NASA Metrics Data repository. Generally, an interesting degree of accuracy is detected, which shows how the metric-based classification is useful. Nevertheless, this article specifies that the application and usage of genetic programming is highly recommended due to the detailed analysis it provides, as well as an important feature in this classification method which allows the viewing of each attributes impact in the dataset.


2011 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 1148-1154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hui-Yan JIANG ◽  
Mao ZONG ◽  
Xiang-Ying LIU

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document