Multiple risk behaviour intervention to prevent depression in primary care

2020 ◽  
Vol 70 (suppl 1) ◽  
pp. bjgp20X711677
Author(s):  
Irene Gómez-Gómez ◽  
Patricia Moreno-Peral ◽  
Tomás López ◽  
Ana Clavería ◽  
Barbara Oliván ◽  
...  

BackgroundPrimary care is the ideal setting for promotion and prevention intervention. Multiple risk behaviour interventions present several advantages over single-risk lifestyle interventions. Multiple risk behaviour interventions could be easily implemented in primary care to prevent non-communicable disease and depression.AimTo test the effectiveness of a multiple risk behaviour intervention to promote Mediterranean diet, physical activity, and/or smoking cessation in people attending Spanish primary health care with incidence of depression and symptoms of depression.MethodThis was a secondary analysis of the EIRA study that aims to test the effectiveness of a multiple risk behaviour intervention to promote healthy lifestyles. Twenty-six primary care centres were randomised to receive multiple risk behaviour intervention or usual care. The multiple risk behaviour intervention included individual sessions, group sessions, communitarian activities, and SMS reception. Participants were followed for 10–14 months. The primary outcomes of this study were incidence of depression and reductions of depressive symptoms.ResultsThree thousand and sixty-seven participants were included. Females accounted for 45.13% and 93.88% were Spanish. Age varied between 45 and 75 years old. The effectiveness of the intervention will be calculated using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (‎CIDI)‎ depression section. Linear and logistic regression will be used to create predictive models.ConclusionPrimary care is the most accessible service in the health system for patients. Hence primary care is the ideal setting for health education, promotion, and prevention interventions. This study will provide high-quality evidence about the effectiveness of multiple risk behaviour interventions over depression prevention.

2003 ◽  
Vol 182 (3) ◽  
pp. 205-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Petros Skapinakis ◽  
Glyn Lewis ◽  
Venetsanos Mavreas

BackgroundUnexplained fatigue has been extensively studied but most of the samples used were from Western countries.AimsTo present international data on the prevalence of unexplained fatigue and fatigue as a presenting complaint in primary care.MethodSecondary analysis of the World Health Organization study of psychological problems in general health care. A total of 5438 primary care attenders from 14 countries were assessed with the Composite International Diagnostic Interview.ResultsThe prevalence of unexplained fatigue of 1-month duration differed across centres, with a range between 2.26 (95% CI 1.17–4.33) and 15.05 (95% CI 10.85–20.49). Subjects from more-developed countries were more likely to report unexplained fatigue but less likely to present with fatigue to physicians compared with subjects from less developed countries.ConclusionsIn less-developed countries fatigue might be an indicator of unmet psychiatric need, but in more-developed countries it is probably a symbol of psychosocial distress.


1998 ◽  
Vol 173 (S34) ◽  
pp. 18-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Weiller ◽  
J.-C. Bisserbe ◽  
W. Maier ◽  
Y. Lecrubier

Background This study explored the prevalence, socio-demographic characteristics and severity of different anxiety syndromes in five European primary care settings, as well as medical help-seeking, recognition by general practitioners (GPs) and treatment prescribed.Method The data were collected as part of the WHO study on Psychological Problems in General Health Care. Among 9714 consecutive primary care patients, 1973 were interviewed using the Composite International Diagnostic Interview. Reason for contact, ICD–10 diagnoses, severity and disability were assessed. Recognition rates and treatment prescribed were obtained from the GPs.Results Anxiety syndromes, whether corresponding to well-defined disorders or to subthreshold conditions, are frequent in primary care and are associated with a clinically significant degree of severity and substantial psychosocial disability. Their recognition by GPs as well as the proportion treated are low.Conclusions Since people with subthreshold anxiety show a substantial degree of disability and suffering, GPs may consider diagnostic criteria to be insufficient. However, their awareness of specific definitions and treatment patterns for anxiety disorders still needs a lot of improvement both for patients' well-being and for the cost resulting from non-treatment.


2009 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 634-639 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Drieskens ◽  
H. Van Oyen ◽  
S. Demarest ◽  
J. Van der Heyden ◽  
L. Gisle ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 1013-1024 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. JORDANOVA ◽  
C. WICKRAMESINGHE ◽  
C. GERADA ◽  
M. PRINCE

Background. The most widely used survey measures in psychiatry, the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) and the Clinical Interview Schedule – Revised (CIS-R) have generated estimates of psychiatric morbidity that show considerable variation. Doubts have been raised regarding the validity of these structured lay interviewer assessments. There have been no direct comparisons of the performances of these instruments against a common, established criterion.Method. A total of 105 unselected primary care attendees were each interviewed with CIDI, CIS-R and SCAN in a single sitting with random order of administration. SCAN was administered by a SCAN trained psychiatrist, and CIDI and CIS-R by a public health doctor. Concordance was estimated for all ICD-10 neurotic disorders. We assessed the overall discriminability of the CIS-R morbidity scale using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.Results. The concordance for CIDI for ICD-10 diagnoses was moderate to excellent (kappa=0·58–0·97). Concordance for CIS-R ranged between poor and moderate (kappa=0·10–0·65). The area under the ROC curve for the CIS-R morbidity scale with respect to any ICD-10 disorder [0·87 (95% CI 0·79–0·95)] indicated good overall discriminability, but poor sensitivity (44%) and high specificity (97%) at the usual CIS-R cut-point of 11/12.Conclusion. Among primary care attendees the CIDI is a highly valid assessment of common mental disorders, and the CIS-R is moderately valid. Previous studies may have underestimated validity. Against the criteria of all ICD-10 diagnoses (including less severe depressive and anxiety disorders) a much lower CIS-R cut-point is required than that which is usually advocated.


2014 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 44-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruth R Kipping ◽  
Michèle Smith ◽  
Jon Heron ◽  
Matthew Hickman ◽  
Rona Campbell

2012 ◽  
Vol 34 (suppl 1) ◽  
pp. i20-i30 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. J. MacArthur ◽  
M. C. Smith ◽  
R. Melotti ◽  
J. Heron ◽  
J. Macleod ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 34 (suppl 1) ◽  
pp. i1-i2 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. R. Kipping ◽  
R. M. Campbell ◽  
G. J. MacArthur ◽  
D. J. Gunnell ◽  
M. Hickman

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document