Is adolescent multiple risk behaviour associated with reduced socioeconomic status in young adulthood and do those with low socioeconomic backgrounds experience greater negative impact? Findings from two UK birth cohort studies

Background Adolescent multiple risk behaviour (MRB) is associated with negative outcomes such as police arrests, unemployment and premature mortality and morbidity. What is unknown is whether MRB is associated with socioeconomic status (SES) in adulthood. We test whether adolescent MRB is associated with socioeconomic status (SES) in young adulthood and whether it is moderated by early life SES variables. Methods Prospective cohort studies; British Cohort Study 1970 (BCS70) and Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC), born in 1991–1992, were used and two comparable MRB variables were derived. Logistic regression was used to determine the association between MRB and young adult SES. The moderating effect of three early life SES variables was assessed using logistic regression models with and without interaction parameters. Evidence to support the presence of moderation was determined by likelihood ratio tests ≤p = 0.05. Multiple imputation was used to account for missing data. Results Adolescents had a median of two risk behaviours in BCS70 and three in ALSPAC. Adolescent MRB was negatively associated with young adult SES (university degree attainment) in BCS70 (OR 0.81, 95% CI: 0.76, 0.86) and ALSPAC (OR 0.85, 95% CI: 0.82, 0.88). There was a dose response relationship, with each additional risk behaviour resulting in reduced odds of university degree attainment. MRB was associated occupational status at age 34 in BCS70 (OR 0.86 95% CI: 0.82, 0.90). In BCS70, there was evidence that maternal education (p = 0.03), parental occupational status (p = 0.009) and household income (p = 0.03) moderated the effect of adolescent MRB on young adult SES in that the negative effect of MRB is stronger for those with low socioeconomic backgrounds. No evidence of moderation was found in the ALSPAC cohort. Conclusions Adolescence appears to be a critical time in the life course to address risk behaviours, due to the likelihood that behaviours established here may have effects in adulthood. Intervening on adolescent MRB could improve later SES outcomes and thus affect health outcomes later in life. Evidence for a moderation effect in the BCS70 but not ALSPAC suggests that more detailed measures should be investigated to capture the nuance of contemporary young adult SES.

Community mobilisation approaches to preventing and reducing adolescent multiple risk behaviour: a realist review protocol

Background Adolescent multiple risk behaviour (MRB) continues to be a global health issue. Most interventions have focused on the proximal causes of adolescent MRB such as peer or family influence, rather than targeting the wider environmental or structural context. There is increasing recognition that community mobilisation approaches could be beneficial for adolescent health. Despite this, there are gaps in the current literature, theory and implementation that would benefit from a realist approach due to the suitability of this methodology to analysing complex interventions. The objective of this study is to understand ‘how, why, for whom and in what circumstances and time periods’ do community mobilisation interventions work to prevent and/or reduce adolescent multiple risk behaviour. Methods This is a protocol for a realist review. The review will use a six-stage iterative process, guided by the RAMESES framework. We will systematically search PubMed, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, CINAHL and Sociological Abstracts, from their inception to 2021. Studies will be screened for relevance to the programme theory and included based on a priori eligibility criteria including (1) reporting a community mobilisation intervention (2) targeting two health risk behaviors (3) for adolescent populations. Two independent reviewers will select, screen and extract data related to the program theory from all relevant sources. A realist logic of analysis will be used to identify all context-mechanism-outcome configurations that contribute to our programme theory. The findings will be synthesised to produce a refined programme theory model. Discussion The goal of this realist review is to identify and refine a programme theory for community mobilisation approaches to the prevention and/or reduction of adolescent multiple risk behaviour. Our aim is that the findings surrounding the programme theory refinement can be used to develop and implement adolescent multiple risk behaviour interventions and maintain collaboration between local policy makers, researchers and community members. Systematic review registration This realist review is registered on the PROSPERO database (registration number: CRD42020205342).

Community mobilisation approaches to preventing and reducing adolescent multiple risk behaviour: a realist review protocol

Background: Adolescent multiple risk behaviour (MRB) continues to be a global health issue, contributing to the burden of non-communicable diseases. Most interventions have focused on the proximal causes of adolescent MRB such as peer or family influence, rather than targeting the wider environmental or structural context. There is increasing recognition that community mobilisation approaches that extend beyond individually-focused educational programmes could be beneficial for adolescent health. Despite this, there are gaps in the current literature, theory and implementation that would benefit from a realist approach due to the suitability of this methodology to analysing complex interventions. In this protocol, we outline our study that aims to understand how, why, for whom and in what circumstances and time periods do community mobilisation interventions work to prevent and/or reduce adolescent multiple risk behaviour? Methods: A realist review was chosen as the most suitable review method as it is theory-driven and seeks to understand how, why and for whom interventions work to produce intended and unintended outcomes. A six-stage iterative process is outlined, which includes initial development of a programme theory, systematic searching, study selection and appraisal, data extraction and data synthesis. We will engage with stakeholders at different stages in this process to aid the development of the programme theory. Discussion: The goal of this realist review is to identify and refine a programme theory for community mobilisation approaches to the prevention and/or reduction of adolescent multiple risk behaviour. Our aim is that the findings surrounding the programme theory refinement can be used to develop and implement adolescent multiple risk behaviour interventions and maintain collaboration between local policy makers, researchers and community members.

Multiple risk behaviour and socioeconomic status during the transition from adolescence to adulthood

Background Multiple risk behaviour (MRB) means the occurrence of two or more risk behaviours and is associated with a range of negative outcomes. What is unknown is whether MRB is associated with socioeconomic status (SES) in adulthood. This study aimed to examine the association between adolescent MRB and young adult SES and whether those who experienced early life socioeconomic disadvantage also faced greater negative impact of adolescent MRB. Methods Two prospective birth cohort studies; British Cohort Study 1970 (BCS70) and Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC), born in 1991-1992, were used. Logistic regression assessed the association between MRB and young adult SES. Three early life SES variables were examined for their moderating effect on the association using models with and without interaction parameters. Likelihood ratio tests ≤p=0.05 indicated evidence to support moderation. Multiple imputation was used to account for missing data. Results Adolescent MRB was negatively associated with young adult SES (university degree attainment) in BCS70 (OR 0.81, 95% CI: 0.76, 0.86) and ALSPAC (OR 0.85, 95% CI: 0.82, 0.88). There was a dose response, with each additional risk behaviour resulting in reduced odds of university degree attainment. In BCS70, maternal education (p = 0.03), parental occupation (p = 0.009) and household income (p = 0.03) moderated the effect of adolescent MRB on young adult SES. The effect of MRB on university degree attainment was stronger for those from poorer socioeconomic backgrounds. No evidence of moderation was found in ALSPAC. Conclusions Adolescence is a critical time to address MRB as behaviours established here may have effects in adulthood. Intervening on adolescent MRB may improve later SES and thus health outcomes later in life. Evidence for a moderation effect in the BCS70 but not ALSPAC suggests that measures should be investigated for their ability to capture the nuance of contemporary young adult SES. Key messages Intervening on adolescent multiple risk behaviour could improve socioeconomic life chances in young adulthood. Variables that capture the nuance of contemporary young adult socioeconomic status should be explored.

Multiple risk behaviour intervention to prevent depression in primary care

BackgroundPrimary care is the ideal setting for promotion and prevention intervention. Multiple risk behaviour interventions present several advantages over single-risk lifestyle interventions. Multiple risk behaviour interventions could be easily implemented in primary care to prevent non-communicable disease and depression.AimTo test the effectiveness of a multiple risk behaviour intervention to promote Mediterranean diet, physical activity, and/or smoking cessation in people attending Spanish primary health care with incidence of depression and symptoms of depression.MethodThis was a secondary analysis of the EIRA study that aims to test the effectiveness of a multiple risk behaviour intervention to promote healthy lifestyles. Twenty-six primary care centres were randomised to receive multiple risk behaviour intervention or usual care. The multiple risk behaviour intervention included individual sessions, group sessions, communitarian activities, and SMS reception. Participants were followed for 10–14 months. The primary outcomes of this study were incidence of depression and reductions of depressive symptoms.ResultsThree thousand and sixty-seven participants were included. Females accounted for 45.13% and 93.88% were Spanish. Age varied between 45 and 75 years old. The effectiveness of the intervention will be calculated using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (‎CIDI)‎ depression section. Linear and logistic regression will be used to create predictive models.ConclusionPrimary care is the most accessible service in the health system for patients. Hence primary care is the ideal setting for health education, promotion, and prevention interventions. This study will provide high-quality evidence about the effectiveness of multiple risk behaviour interventions over depression prevention.