scholarly journals Excessive polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate prescribing in 147 care-homes: cross-sectional study

BJGP Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. BJGPO.2021.0167
Author(s):  
Clare MacRae ◽  
David Henderson ◽  
Stewart Mercer ◽  
Jenni Burton ◽  
Nicosha De Souza ◽  
...  

BackgroundCare-home residents often have multiple cognitive and physical impairments and are at high risk of adverse drug events (ADEs).AimDescribe excessive polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate prescribing predisposing care-home residents to ADEs.Design and SettingCross-sectional analysis of all dispensed prescriptions for residents of 147 care-homes.MethodPrevalence of excessive polypharmacy was examined using multilevel logistic regression, by modelling associations between individual and care-home predictors with excessive polypharmacy (≥10 drugs). Prescribing of drugs known to increase the risk of eight clinically important ADE categories was examined. Drugs prescribed within each ADE category, for each resident, were counted.Results32.3% of residents had excessive polypharmacy, which was more common in residents aged 70–74 years (aOR =1.86 [1.04–3.34]) and 80–84 years (aOR =1.75 [1.01–3.02]), living in a residential care-home (aOR =1.50 [95%CI 1.19–1.88]), and located in Fife (aOR =1.37 [1.09–1.71]). Excessive polypharmacy was less common in residents with dementia (aOR =0.73 [0.64–0.84]). 8.9% (5.9%–11.6%) of the variation was attributable to care-home predictors. Potentially inappropriate prescribing of ≥2 drugs was seen across all ADE categories with highest prevalence seen in drugs predisposing to constipation (35.8%), sedation (27.7%), and renal injury (18.0%).ConclusionsExcessive polypharmacy is common in care-home residents and is associated with both individual and care-home predictors. Potentially inappropriate prescribing of drugs that predisposed residents to all included ADEs categories is common. Research is needed to support and evaluate safe care-home prescribing practices.

2021 ◽  
pp. BJGP.2020.1048
Author(s):  
Amandeep Khatter ◽  
Frank Moriarty ◽  
Mark Ashworth ◽  
Stevo Durbaba ◽  
Patrick Redmond

Background: Potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) is common in older adults and known to be associated with polypharmacy and multimorbidity. Less is known about the prevalence and causes of PIP in middle-aged adults. Aim: To determine the prevalence and predictors of PIP in middle-aged adults. Design and Setting: A repeated cross-sectional study was conducted using primary care data in London. Method: PIP was defined using the PRescribing Optimally in Middle-aged People’s Treatment (PROMPT) criteria. Prescribing and demographic data were extracted from Lambeth DataNet (LDN), a pseudonymised database of all patients registered at general practices in Lambeth, for those aged 45-64 years prescribed ≥1 medicines in each year, 2014-2019 (n=46,633-52,582). Prevalence and trends over six years were investigated, including the association of PIP with polypharmacy, multimorbidity, deprivation, gender and age. Results: The prevalence of PIP decreased from 20% in 2014 to 18% in 2019. The most prevalent PROMPT criteria in 2019 were the use of ≥2 drugs from the same pharmacological class (7.6%), use of NSAIDs for >3 months (7%) and use of PPIs above recommended maintenance dosages for >8 weeks (3%). Over the study period, the prevalence of multimorbidity increased (47-52%), and polypharmacy remained stable (27%). Polypharmacy, multimorbidity, deprivation and age were independently associated with PIP. Conclusions: Almost a fifth of middle-aged adults prescribed medicines are exposed to PIP, as defined by the PROMPT criteria. This is likely to be linked with exposure to avoidable adverse drug events. The PROMPT criteria may provide a useful aid in interventions to optimise prescribing.


2021 ◽  
Vol 60 (1) ◽  
pp. 6-6

AbstractOverview of: Khatter A, Moriarty F, Ashworth M et al. Prevalence and predictors of potentially inappropriate prescribing in middle-aged adults: a repeated cross-sectional study. Br J Gen Pract. 2021;71:e491–e497.


2017 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 386-393 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Luiza Pereira Moreira Mori ◽  
Renata Cunha Carvalho ◽  
Patricia Melo Aguiar ◽  
Maria Goretti Farias de Lima ◽  
Magali da Silva Pacheco Nobre Rossi ◽  
...  

CMAJ Open ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. E346-E351 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. G. Morgan ◽  
J. Hunt ◽  
J. Rioux ◽  
J. Proulx ◽  
D. Weymann ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document