scholarly journals Identification and management of frailty in English primary care: a qualitative study of national policy

BJGP Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. bjgpopen20X101019
Author(s):  
Khulud Alharbi ◽  
Harm van Marwijk ◽  
David Reeves ◽  
Tom Blakeman
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Qualitative Study ◽  
National Policy ◽  
Evidence Base ◽  
System Thinking ◽  
Normalisation Process Theory ◽  
Routine Practice ◽  
Ageing Population ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Primary Care Professionals

BackgroundPolicymakers are directing attention to addressing the needs of an ageing population. Since 2017, general practices in England have been contractually required to identify and code ‘frailty’ as a new clinical concept and, in doing so, support targeted management for this population with the aim of improving outcomes. However, embedding frailty policies into routine practice is not without challenges and little is currently known about the success of the programme.AimTo explore the implementation of a national policy on frailty identification and management in English primary care.Design & settingQualitative study entailing interviews with primary care professionals in the North of England.MethodSemi-structured interviews were conducted with GPs (n = 10), nurses (n = 6), practice managers (n = 3), and health advisors (n = 3). Normalisation process theory (NPT) and ‘system thinking’ provided sensitising frameworks to support data collection and analysis.ResultsPrimary care professionals were starting to use the concept of frailty to structure care within practices and across organisations; however, there was widespread concern about the challenge of providing expanded care for the identified needs with existing resources. Concerns were also expressed around how best to identify the frail subpopulation and the limitations of current tools for this, and there was a professional reticence to use the term ‘frailty’ with patients.ConclusionFindings suggests that additional, focused resources and the development of a stronger evidence base are essential to facilitate professional engagement in policies to improve the targeted coding and management of frailty in primary care.

scholarly journals Identification and management of frailty in English primary care: a qualitative study of national policy

2020 ◽  
Vol 70 (suppl 1) ◽  
pp. bjgp20X711161
Author(s):  
Harm van Marwijk ◽  
Tom Blakeman ◽  
David Reeves ◽  
Khulud Alharbi
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
National Policy ◽  
Evidence Base ◽  
System Thinking ◽  
Normalisation Process Theory ◽  
Routine Practice ◽  
Ageing Population ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Data Collection And Analysis ◽  
General Practices

BackgroundPolicymakers are directing attention to addressing the needs of an ageing population. Since 2017, general practices in England have been contractually required to identify and code ‘frailty’ as a new clinical concept and, in doing so, support targeted management for this population with the aim of improving outcomes. However, embedding frailty policies into routine practice is not without challenges and little is currently known about the success or otherwise of the programme.AimTo explore the implementation of a national policy on frailty identification and management in English primary care.MethodSemi-structured interviews were conducted with GPs (n = 10), nurses (n = 6), practice managers (n = 3) and health advisors (n = 3). Normalisation Process Theory (NPT) and System Thinking provided sensitizing frameworks to support data collection and analysis.ResultsPrimary care professionals were starting to use the concept of frailty to structure care both within practices and across organisations, however, there was widespread concern about the challenge of providing expanded care for the identified needs within existing resources. Concerns were also expressed around how best to identify the frail subpopulation and the limitations of current tools for this, and there was a professional reticence to use the term ‘frailty’ with patients.ConclusionFindings suggest that additional focused resources and the development of a stronger evidence base are essential to facilitate professional engagement in policies to improve the targeted coding and management of frailty in primary care.

scholarly journals Personality disorder co-morbidity in primary care ‘Improving Access to Psychological Therapy’ (IAPT) services: a qualitative study exploring patient perspectives on treatment experience

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
Gary Lamph ◽  
John Baker ◽  
Tommy Dickinson ◽  
Karina Lovell
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Personality Disorder ◽  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Patient Group ◽  
Stepped Care ◽  
Research Approach ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Framework Analysis ◽  
Co Morbidity

Abstract Background: High numbers of people present with common mental health disorders and co-morbid personality disorder traits in primary care ‘Improving Access to Psychological Therapies’ (IAPT) services in England and they receive sub-optimal treatments. No previous studies have explored the treatment experiences or needs of this patient population in England. Aims: This qualitative study explored the treatment experiences of patients (n = 22) with common mental health difficulties and co-morbid personality disorder as indicated by a score of 3 or more on the ‘Standardised Assessment of Personality – Abbreviated Scale’ (SAPAS) in receipt of primary care-based IAPT treatment. Method: A qualitative health research approach was used. Qualitative individual face-to-face semi-structured interviews were conducted. All interviews were audio recorded, data were transcribed verbatim and analysed using a framework analysis approach. Results: Findings revealed a need to adapt away from prescriptive cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) treatment models towards more flexible, personalised and individualised treatment with this patient group. Time to emotionally offload, build a therapeutic relationship and link past experiences to presenting problems were highlighted as important. Conclusions: For the first time, the needs and treatment experiences of this patient group have been explored. This paper provides a unique patient experience insight that should be considered when exploring new approaches to working with and developing effective interventions via a stepped care approach.

scholarly journals Is an opportunistic primary care-based intervention for non-responders to bowel screening feasible and acceptable? A mixed-methods feasibility study in Scotland

BMJ Open ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (10) ◽  
pp. e016307 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natalia Calanzani ◽  
Debbie Cavers ◽  
Gabriele Vojt ◽  
Sheina Orbell ◽  
Robert J C Steele ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Feasibility Study ◽  
Occult Blood ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Framework Analysis ◽  
Test Kit ◽  
General Practices ◽  
Primary Care Professionals

ObjectivesWe aimed to test whether a brief, opportunistic intervention in general practice was a feasible and acceptable way to engage with bowel screening non-responders.DesignThis was a feasibility study testing an intervention which comprised a brief conversation during routine consultation, provision of a patient leaflet and instructions to request a replacement faecal occult blood test kit. A mixed-methods approach to evaluation was adopted. Data were collected from proformas completed after each intervention, from the Bowel Screening Centre database and from questionnaires. Semi-structured interviews were carried out. We used descriptive statistics, content and framework analysis to determine intervention feasibility and acceptability.ParticipantsBowel screening non-responders (as defined by the Scottish Bowel Screening Centre) and primary care professionals working in five general practices in Lothian, Scotland.Primary and secondary outcome measuresSeveral predefined feasibility parameters were assessed, including numbers of patients engaging in conversation, requesting a replacement kit and returning it, and willingness of primary care professionals to deliver the intervention.ResultsThe intervention was offered to 258 patients in five general practices: 220 (87.0%) engaged with the intervention, 60 (23.3%) requested a new kit, 22 (8.5%) kits were completed and returned. Interviews and questionnaires suggest that the intervention was feasible, acceptable and consistent with an existing health prevention agenda. Reported challenges referred to work-related pressures, time constraints and practice priorities.ConclusionsThis intervention was acceptable and resulted in a modest increase in non-responders participating in bowel screening, although outlined challenges may affect sustained implementation. The strategy is also aligned with the increasing role of primary care in promoting bowel screening.

scholarly journals Experiences of support from primary care and perceived needs of parents bereaved by suicide: a qualitative study

2020 ◽  
Vol 70 (691) ◽  
pp. e102-e110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Verity Wainwright ◽  
Lis Cordingley ◽  
Carolyn A Chew-Graham ◽  
Nav Kapur ◽  
Jenny Shaw ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
General Practice ◽  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Support Needs ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Perceived Needs ◽  
The North ◽  
Suicide Bereavement ◽  
Additional Support ◽  
The Uk

BackgroundPeople bereaved by suicide are a vulnerable group, also at risk of dying by suicide. The importance of postvention support (intervention after suicide) has recently been highlighted; however, little is known about the support needs of parents bereaved by suicide in the UK, and the role played by general practice.AimTo explore the perspectives, experiences, and support needs of parents bereaved by suicide.Design and settingThis was a qualitative study, with semi-structured interviews conducted between 2012 and 2014 in the north of England and the Midlands, with parents bereaved by their son or daughter’s suicide.MethodInterviews explored parents’ experiences of suicide bereavement following the death of their son or daughter, with a focus on their experiences of support from primary care. Interviews were analysed thematically using constant comparison.ResultsTwenty-three interviews were conducted. Three themes were identified from the data: the importance of not feeling alone; perceived barriers to accessing support; and the need for signposting for additional support. Some parents reported having experienced good support from their general practice; others described a number of barriers to accessing help, including triage processes. Primary care was considered to be an important avenue of support but GPs were often perceived as uncertain how to respond. The need for information, signposting to avenues of support, and the helpfulness of group support were also highlighted.ConclusionParents believed it was important that people working in general practice have an awareness of suicide bereavement and understanding of their needs, including knowledge of where to direct people for further support.

scholarly journals Perceived facilitators and barriers to chronic disease management in primary care networks: a qualitative study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chuan De Foo ◽  
Shilpa Surendran ◽  
Chen Hee Tam ◽  
Elaine Qiao Ying Ho ◽  
David Bruce Matchar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Chronic Disease ◽  
Disease Management ◽  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Chronic Disease Management ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Great Promise ◽  
Ageing Population ◽  
Chronic Patients ◽  
Facilitators And Barriers

Abstract Background The increasing chronic disease burden in developed countries has placed tremendous strain on tertiary healthcare infrastructure and resources. Therefore, there is an urgent need to shift chronic disease management from tertiary to primary care providers to mitigate the increase in demand for chronic care at hospitals. The organization of private general practitioners (GPs) into Primary Care Networks (PCNs) is a pragmatic move by Singapore, a developed and multi-ethnic urban city, to provide private GPs with team-based care capabilities and a platform to track care indicators for better management of chronic patients. As the PCN initiative is still in its embryonic stages, there is a void in research regarding its ability to empower private GPs to manage chronic patients effectively. This qualitative study aims to explore the facilitators and barriers for the management of chronic patients by private GPs in the PCN. Method: We conducted 30 semi-structured in-depth interviews with GPs enrolled in a PCN. Qualitative analysis of audio transcripts was performed to extract themes which highlighted the facilitators and barriers faced by PCN in the early stages of its development. Results Our results suggest that PCNs facilitated private GPs to more effectively manage chronic patients through 1) provision of ancillary services such as diabetic foot screening, diabetic retinal photography and nurse counselling to permit a “one-stop-shop”, 2) systematic monitoring of process and clinical outcome indicators through a chronic disease registry (CDR) to promote accountability for patients’ health outcomes and 3) funding streams for PCNs to hire additional manpower to oversee operations and to reimburse GPs for extended consultations. Barriers include high administrative load in maintaining the CDR due to the lack of a smart electronic clinic management system and financial gradient faced by patients seeking services from private GPs which incur higher out-of-pocket expenses than public primary healthcare institutions. Conclusion PCNs demonstrate great promise in empowering and motivating private GPs to manage chronic patients. However, barriers will need to be addressed to ensure the quality and comprehensiveness of PCNs in managing more chronic patients in the face of an ageing population.

scholarly journals Perceived facilitators and barriers to chronic disease management in primary care networks: a qualitative study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chuan De Foo ◽  
Shilpa Surendran ◽  
Chen Hee Tam ◽  
Elaine Qiao Ying Ho ◽  
David Bruce Matchar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Chronic Disease ◽  
Disease Management ◽  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Chronic Disease Management ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Great Promise ◽  
Ageing Population ◽  
Chronic Patients ◽  
Facilitators And Barriers

Abstract Background: The increasing chronic disease burden in developed countries has placed tremendous strain on tertiary healthcare infrastructure and resources. Therefore, there is an urgent need to shift chronic disease management from tertiary to primary care providers to mitigate the increase in demand for chronic care at hospitals. The organization of private general practitioners (GPs) into Primary Care Networks (PCNs) is a pragmatic move by Singapore, a developed and multi-ethnic urban city, to provide private GPs with team-based care capabilities and a platform to track care indicators for better management of chronic patients. As the PCN initiative is still in its embryonic stages, there is a void in research regarding its ability to empower private GPs to manage chronic patients effectively. This qualitative study aims to explore the facilitators and barriers for the management of chronic patients by private GPs in the PCN. Method: We conducted 30 semi-structured in-depth interviews with GPs enrolled in a PCN. Qualitative analysis of audio transcripts was performed to generate themes which highlighted the facilitators and barriers faced by PCN in the early stages of its development. Results: Our results suggest that PCNs facilitated private GPs to more effectively manage chronic patients through 1) provision of ancillary services such as diabetic foot screening, diabetic retinal photography and nurse counselling to permit a “one-stop-shop”, 2) systematic monitoring of process and clinical outcome indicators through a chronic disease registry (CDR) to promote accountability for patients’ health outcomes and 3) funding streams for PCNs to hire additional manpower to oversee operations and to reimburse GPs for extended consultations. Barriers include high administrative load in maintaining the CDR due to the lack of a smart electronic clinic management system and financial gradient faced by patients seeking services from private GPs which incur higher out-of-pocket expenses than public primary healthcare institutions.Conclusion: PCNs demonstrate great promise in empowering and motivating private GPs to manage chronic patients. However, barriers will need to be addressed to ensure the quality and comprehensiveness of PCNs in managing more chronic patients in the face of an ageing population.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document