scholarly journals Tindak Pidana Illegal Mining Bagi Perusahaan Yang Melakukan Pertambangan Tanpa Izin

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 350-359
Author(s):  
Jorico Lavianchandra ◽  
Alpi Sahari ◽  
Ahmad Fauzi
Keyword(s):  
Coal Mining ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Mining Activities ◽  
Legal Entity ◽  
Illegal Mining ◽  
Criminal Offenses ◽  
The World ◽  
False Report ◽  
Report Data ◽  
Administrative Sanctions

The issuance of law number 4 of 2009 concerning mineral and coal mining provides a new authority in the world of the act does not close the gap of illegal mining which is rife in Indonesia. Although the law already exists, the fact is that mining without permits continues. This study aims to determine the forms of non-criminal illegal mining and accountability. Forms of illegal mining are criinal acts of mining without permission either UIP, IPR or IUPK. Criminal offenses submit false report data, criminal offenses of exploration without rights, criminal offenses as holders of UIP exploration without carrying out production operations activities, criminal acts of laundering mining goods, criminal offenses related to abuse of authority of the official of the licensing authority, criminal acts which is a legal entity. The criminal liability against companies that carry aut mining activities without a permit is by imprisonment and with a criminal fine. Besides that the leablity for companies that conduct mining with civi sanctions and also administrative sanctions by way of making a business.

scholarly journals Criminal Liability of Legal Entities under the Laws of the Republic of Slovenia

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 75-80
Author(s):  
Aleksandr V. Fedorov ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Security Measures ◽  
Legal Entity ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Commercial Activities ◽  
Criminal Offenses ◽  
Conditional Sentence ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Legal Entities

The article is dedicated to review of the laws of the Republic of Slovenia on the criminal liability of legal entities; the main acts are the Special Law on the Liability of Legal Entities for Criminal Offenses of 1999 and the Criminal Code of the Republic of Slovenia. The article reviews statutory resolutions making it possible to review a legal entity as a criminal liability subject; gives a number of persons, which can be brought to criminal liability; focuses on the fact that legal entities can be brought to criminal liability in the Republic of Slovenia for a limited number of acts (crimes) defined by the law; considers criminal sanctions applicable to legal entities: fi ne, forfeiture of property, legal entity liquidation, prohibition to place securities held by a legal entity; reviews the possibility of imposition of a conditional sentence on a legal entity and the security measures applicable to legal entities, including: sentence publication and prohibition to engage in specific commercial activities.

scholarly journals Kewenangan Kepolisian Dalam Menangani Tindak Pidana Pertambangan (Ilegal Mining) Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 2009 (Studi Di Kepolisian Negara Indonesia)

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dany Andhika Karya Gita ◽  
Amin Purnawan
Keyword(s):  
Coal Mining ◽  
Deterrent Effect ◽  
Mining Activities ◽  
The Public ◽  
Illegal Mining ◽  
Police Authority ◽  
Local Residents ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Security Operations ◽  
National Police

ABSTRACT �This research is entitled The Authority of Police in Handling Mining Criminal Act According to Law Number 4 Year 2009 (Study in Indonesian National Police). The purpose of this research: 1) To know and analyze the authority of Police in handling illegal mining according to Law Number 4 Year 2009 regarding Mineral and Coal Mining. 2) To evaluate preventive and repressive efforts by the Police in illegal mining in Indonesia.Research Result: 1) The authority of the Police is the authority as stipulated in Law Number 2 Year 2002 regarding the Police of the Republic of Indonesia. The duties and powers of the Police are regulated in detail in Chapter III. In the execution of duties (Articles 13 and 14), the Police are granted the authority described in Article 15 and Article 16 with further provisions in Article 17, Article 18, and Article 19. 2) a. Preventive efforts in conducting patrols, raids, security operations conducted routinely and provide socialization to the public about the importance of creating security and how to overcome illegal stone mining and approaching with local residents to do pekon not to do illegal mining activities. While repressive efforts are done by optimizing the efforts of prosecution and collect evidence to act legally illegal mining actors with the provision of sanctions firm and deterrent effect and through mediation of the parties litigation so that the perpetrators do not need to be processed through criminal sanctions.Key Words: Police Authority, Crime, Mining�ABSTRAKPenelitian ini berjudul Kewenangan Kepolisian Dalam Menangani Tindak Pidana Pertambangan (Ilegal Mining) Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 2009 (Studi di Kepolisian Negara Indonesia). Tujuan Penelitian ini : 1) Untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis kewenangan Polri dalam menangani ilegal miningmenurut Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 2009 tentang Pertambangan Mineral dan Batu Bara. 2) Untuk mengevaluasi upaya preventifdan upaya represif yang dilakukan oleh Polri dalam Tindak Pidana Pertambangan (ilegal mining) di Indonesia.Hasil Penelitian : 1)Kewenangan Polri adalah wewenang yang tertuang dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2002 tentang Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia. Tugas dan wewenang Polri diatur secara terperinci di dalam Bab III. Dalam pelaksanaan tugas (Pasal 13 dan Pasal 14), Polri diberikan wewenang yang dijabarkan dalam Pasal 15 dan Pasal 16 dengan ketentuan lebih lanjut pada Pasal 17, Pasal 18, dan Pasal 19.2) a. Upaya secara preventif yaitu melaksanakan patroli, razia, operasi keamanan yang dilakukan secara rutin dan memberikan sosialisasi kepada masyarakat tentang pentingnya menciptakan keamanan serta cara mengatasi penambangan batu ilegal serta melakukan pendekatan dengan warga sekitar melakukan rembuk pekon untuk tidak melakukan kegiatan penambangan batu secara liar. Sedangkan upaya represif yang dilakukan adalah dengan mengoptimalkan upaya penindakan serta menghimpun bukti-bukti guna menindak secara hukum pelaku penambangan batu secara liar dengan pemberian sanksi tegas dan berefek jera serta melalui mediasi terhadap para pihak yang berperkara sehingga pelaku tidak perlu di proses melalui sanksi pidana.Kata Kunci : Kewenangan Kepolisian, Tindak Pidana,Pertambangan�

scholarly journals Criminal Liability for Cryptocurrency Transactions: Global Experience

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 304
Author(s):  
Volodymyr Cherniei ◽  
Serhii Cherniavskyi ◽  
Viktoria Babanina ◽  
Оlena Tykho
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Significant Part ◽  
Government Agencies ◽  
Criminal Offenses ◽  
Legal Nature ◽  
The World

The article examines the features of criminal liability for transactions related to the circulation of cryptocurrencies. In order to determine the specifics of criminal violations in the field of cryptocurrency circulation, the legal nature of cryptocurrencies is studied. It is concluded that in order to properly qualify criminal offenses related to the circulation of cryptocurrencies, it is advisable to recognize cryptocurrencies as a type of property or money. The article analyzes the global approaches to the legal regulation of relations related to the circulation of cryptocurrencies. Based on the results of this analysis, it is concluded that relations regarding cryptocurrencies in most countries of the world are insufficiently regulated and are still outside of the legal field. This complicates, inter alia, the establishment of criminal liability for transactions involving the circulation of cryptocurrencies. A significant part of the article is devoted directly to the study of criminal liability for transactions involving the circulation of cryptocurrencies in different countries. The norms of the Criminal Codes, which establish liability for criminal violations in the field of cryptocurrency circulation, are analyzed. The measures that need to be implemented to ensure the control of government agencies over the circulation of cryptocurrencies and the security of all operations related to cryptocurrencies are identified.

scholarly journals Criminal Sanctions against Taxpayer Who are Negligent to Register Land and Building Taxes

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 73-78
Author(s):  
Made Putri Pradnya Parahita ◽  
Simon Nahak ◽  
I Ketut Widia
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Third Parties ◽  
Legal Basis ◽  
Legal Entity ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Common Problems ◽  
Administrative Sanctions

One of the most common problems related to land and building tax is where there are citizens who are aware of their obligation to pay taxes by registering their objects, but due to certain circumstances, the taxpayer does not register the tax object he owns. This study aims to find out the regulation of criminal sanctions against taxpayers who do not register land and building tax and to find out the criminal liability of taxpayers who do not register the object of land and building tax. This study uses normative research that starts with an indication of the obscurity of legal norms. The results of this study showed that the provision of sanctions is needed as a form of the last effort to realize the certainty of tax activities going well. Sanctions given can be in the form of administrative sanctions in the form of fines to criminal sanctions in the form of prison or confinement, which can be imposed on taxpayers and related officials. Criminal liability in the field of taxation arises when each taxpayer is indicated to have committed a tax crime. The intended taxpayer is an individual taxpayer or legal entity or corporation. Likewise, it has been regulated that starting from the taxpayer, tax officials/employees, to third parties have their respective criminal liabilities. The legal basis is Law Number 28 of 2007 concerning General Provisions and Tax Procedures. The advice given is the need for strict rules regarding criminal sanctions against land and building tax registration.  

scholarly journals Menjerat Kader, Melepas Partai Politik; Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Partai Politik Dalam Kasus Tindak Pidana Korupsi

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-78
Author(s):  
Zulkifli Aspan ◽  
Wiwin Suwandi
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Political Parties ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Political Corruption ◽  
Legal Entity ◽  
Flow Of Funds ◽  
Party Elites ◽  
The Law ◽  
Administrative Sanctions

Amid the resounding steps of the KPK to carry out the law enforcement function of eradicating Corruption, there are still things that feel stagnant. The KPK does not or has not dared to ensnare political parties in corrupt criminal liability, using corruption laws. In each case with dimensions of political corruption, the KPK only ensnares party elites, but does not at the same time demand criminal liability from political parties. In fact, in several cases investigated, the flow of funds flowed into political parties. As a special offense, revising the Corruption Law, by entering the phrase "legal entity", in addition to the phrase "everyone" is needed to find, or build a channel to ensnare political parties in corruption criminal liability. accompanied by state losses and fines. Administrative sanctions can also be applied through freezing through the Kemenkumham or the dissolution of these political parties through the Constitutional Court's path when the KPK's charges and demands can be proven.

scholarly journals CRIMINAL LIABILITY OF FISHERY PERPETRATOR ACCORDING TO FISHERY LAW NUMBER 45 OF 2009 CONCERNING AMENDMENT TO LAW NUMBER 31 OF 2004

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 127-139
Author(s):  
Yulia Monita ◽  
Nys. Arfa ◽  
Zulham Adamy
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Liability ◽  
The State ◽  
Criminal Offenses ◽  
Qualitative Descriptive ◽  
The Law ◽  
Administrative Sanctions ◽  
Approval Letter

Many occurrences of fisheries criminal offenses make the writer interested to learn about criminal provisions and the responsibility of the perpetrators according to Law No. 45 of 2009 concerning amendments to Law No. 31 of 2004 concerning Fishery. By studying, understanding, and analyzing these articles of law, the author significantly obtains the picture of whether this Fishery Law is appropriate and able to force the perpetrator of their responsibility for their actions. The purposes of this paper are 1) To analyze the patterns of fishery criminal so the perpetrators could be charged their responsibilities according to Law No. 45 of 2009, 2) To study and analyze how to determine the penalties according to the Law No. 45 of 2009. This paper is a qualitative descriptive. The method of this research is normative law with conceptual and institutional approaches. The result of the study showed that legislation in Indonesia relating to Fisheries, administratively, there are still several articles that are sticking out and controversy according to Law No. 45 of 2009 concerning amendments to Law No. 31 of 2004 concerning Fishery. For small fishermen who do not have a Yachting Approval Letter (SPB) in Indonesia should be subjected to administrative sanctions such as paying compensation. If administrative sanctions are not implemented, then the principle of ultimum remedium can be applied as a last choice in violations of fisheries and there are still several articles that are detrimental to the interests of the State as well as the interests of local fishermen which, if seen from criminal liability, may be imposed.

CRIMINAL LIABILITY OF LEGAL ENTITIES IN UKRAINE

2021 ◽  
pp. 9-28
Author(s):  
Александр Вячеславович ФЕДОРОВ
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Legal Entity ◽  
Usual Procedure ◽  
Criminal Offenses ◽  
Legal Nature ◽  
General Part ◽  
Legal Entities

Статья посвящена вопросам введения уголовной ответственности юридических лиц на Украине. Рассматриваются попытки установления такой ответственности при подготовке нового Уголовного кодекса Украины и в дальнейшем путем принятия в 2009 г. специального уголовного закона об ответственности юридических лиц за совершение коррупционных преступлений. Украина стала первым из постсоветских государств, включившим такие нормы не в уголовный кодекс, а в специальный закон - комплексный нормативный правовой акт, содержащий нормы уголовного и уголовно-процессуального законодательства. Отмечается, что этот закон являлся действующим лишь 4 дня, и приводятся причины признания его утратившим силу. Повторно уголовная ответственность была установлена путем внесения в 2013 г. в Уголовный кодекс Украины изменений, согласно которым юридические лица признаются не субъектами уголовных правонарушений, а субъектами уголовной ответственности, заключающейся в применении судом в уголовно-процессуальном порядке мер уголовно-правового характера в отношении юридического лица. Применение таких мер возможно в случаях совершения уполномоченным физическим лицом уголовных правонарушений (преступлений и уголовных проступков), специально указанных в Общей части Уголовного кодекса Украины. Рассматриваются применяемые к юридическим лицам виды мер уголовно-правового характера: штраф, конфискация и ликвидация юридического лица. Приводятся правила применения к юридическим лицам мер уголовно-правового характера и основания для освобождения юридического лица от применения к нему таких мер. Отмечается, что уголовное судопроизводство по делам об уголовных правонарушениях, при совершении которых к юридическим лицам могут быть применены меры уголовно-правового характера, осуществляется в соответствии с обычной процедурой с учетом особенностей, предусмотренных Уголовно-процессуальным кодексом Украины. Дается краткая характеристика этих особенностей, в том числе указывается, что от имени юридического лица в уголовном процессе участвует его представитель. Рассматриваются его права и обязанности. The article is devoted to the issues of introducing criminal liability of legal entities in Ukraine. The article considers attempts to establish such liability in the preparation of the new Criminal Code of Ukraine and further by the adoption in 2009 of a special criminal law on liability of legal entities for committing corruption crimes. Ukraine became the first of the post-Soviet states to include such norms not in the criminal code, but in a special law - a comprehensive normative legal act containing the norms of criminal and criminal procedural legislation. It is noted that this law was in effect for only 4 days and the reasons for recognizing it as invalid are given. Criminal liability was re-established by introducing amendments to the Criminal Code of Ukraine in 2013, according to which legal entities are recognized not as subjects of criminal offenses, but as subjects of criminal liability, which consists in the application by the court in the criminal procedural procedure of measures of a criminal-legal nature in relation to a legal entity. The application of such measures is possible in cases of committing by an authorized individual of criminal offenses (crimes and criminal offenses), specially specified in the General Part of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. The types of measures of a criminal-legal nature applied to legal entities are considered: fines, confiscation and liquidation of a legal entity. The rules for the application of measures of a criminal-legal nature to legal entities and the grounds for exempting a legal entity from applying such measures to it are given. It is noted that criminal proceedings on cases of criminal offences in commission of which measures of criminal law nature can be applied to legal persons, is carried out in accordance with the usual procedure taking into account the peculiarities provided by the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine. A brief description of these peculiarities is given, including the fact that on behalf of a legal entity its representative participates in criminal proceedings. The rights and obligations of the representative are considered.

scholarly journals Sanksi Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penambangan Batu Padas Atau Paras Secara Ilegal Criminal Sanctions Against Perpetrators Of Illegal Padas (Paras Stone)

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-11
Author(s):  
Audia Priti Sarasvati ◽  
I Made Sepud ◽  
I Nyoman Sutama
Keyword(s):  
Mining Activities ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Technical Requirements ◽  
Illegal Mining ◽  
Criminal Offenses ◽  
Rock Mining ◽  
Environmental Requirements ◽  
Case Number

Abstract-This study uses a type of normative legal research. The sources of legal material used are primary legal material and secondary legal material. The problem in this thesis is the regulation of criminal sanctions against the perpetrators of criminal acts of illegal rock mining (paras) and the consideration of judges against the perpetrators of criminal acts of illegal mining (paras). The results of the study can be concluded that the forms of mining business permit arrangements are regulated in Law No. 4 of 2009 concerning mining of minerals and coal. And if you want to have a permit in mining activities, you must fulfill the requirements in the form of administrative requirements, technical requirements, environmental requirements, and financial requirements. Judge's consideration in illegally imposing criminal offenses in the case number 32/Pid.sus/2017/Pn.Gin. The judge sentenced the defendant to a suspended sentence, also saw the judge's consideration of seeing the position of the case, the attitude of the defendant in the trial and returning to the conviction of the judge of the sentence whether it was appropriate to be dropped on the defendant. Keywords: Crime, sansction, illegal paras Abstrak-Penelitian ini dimuat untuk mengetahui pengaturan sanksi pidana terhadap pelaku tindak pidana penambangan batu padas (paras) secara ilegal di Pengadilan Negeri Gianyar, dimana dalam pengkajiannya membahas pengaturan sanksi pidana mengenai kegiatan pertambangan yang tidak mematuhi prosedur atau peraturan tanpa adanya izin dalam kasus pidana putusan pengadilan negeri No.32/Pid.Sus/2017/PN.Gin. Penelitian ini menggunakan tipe penelitian hukum normatif. Sumber bahan hukum yang digunakan adalah bahan hukum primer dan bahan hukum sekunder. Permasalahan dalam penelitian ini adalah pengaturan sanksi pidana terhadap pelaku tindak pidana penambangan batu padas (paras) secara ilegal dan pertimbangan hakim terhadap pelaku tindak pidana penambangan batu padas (paras) secara ilegal. Hasil pengkajian ini disimpulkan bahwa bentuk-bentuk pengaturan izin usaha pertambangan diatur dalam undang-undang no. 4 tahun 2009 tentang pertambangan mineral dan batubara dan jika ingin memiliki izin dalam kegiatan pertambangan harus memenuhi syarat-syarat berupa syarat administratif, syarat teknis, syarat lingkungan dan syarat finansial. Pertimbangan hakim dalam menjatuhkan pidana terhadap pelaku penambangan batu padas (paras) secara ilegal dalam kasus No. 32/Pid.Sus/2017/PN.Gin. Dilihat dari pertimbangan Hakim yakni pada posisi kasusnya, sikap terdakwa pada saat persidangan dan pada keyakinan hakim untuk memutuskan suatu hukuman yang pantas dijatuhkan kepada terdakwa. Hal tersebutlah yang mendasari Hakim untuk menjatuhkan hukuman percobaan terhadap terdakwa. Kata kunci: Pidana, sanksi, paras illegal

scholarly journals Criminal Liability of Legal Entities under the Laws of the Republic of Croatia

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 76-80
Author(s):  
Aleksandr V. Fedorov ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Security Measures ◽  
Legal Entity ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Criminal Offenses ◽  
Conditional Sentence ◽  
The Republic ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Legal Entities

The article is dedicated to review of the laws of the Republic of Croatia on the criminal liability of legal entities; the main acts are the Special Law on the Liability of Legal Entities for Criminal Offenses of 2003, the Criminal Code of the Republic of Croatia and the Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Croatia. The article reviews statutory resolutions making it possible to review a legal entity as a criminal liability subject; gives a number of legal entities, which can be brought to criminal liability; focuses on the fact that legal entities can be brought to criminal liability in the Republic of Croatia for any acts defined by the law as crimes; considers criminal punishments (sanctions) applicable to legal entities: fi ne and legal entity liquidation; reviews the possibility of imposition of a conditional sentence on a legal entity; reviews the security measures applicable to legal entities, including: professional prohibitions (prohibitions to perform specific activities or transactions), prohibitions to perform transactions using national or local budgetary funds, prohibitions to receive licenses, permissions, subventions or concessions provided by national bodies; sentence publication and forfeiture.

scholarly journals The Kosovan Option of the Criminal Liability of Legal Entities

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 75-80
Author(s):  
Aleksandr V. Fedorov ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Criminal Sanction ◽  
Legal Entity ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Criminal Offenses ◽  
General Part ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Legal Entities

The article is dedicated to a review of the laws on criminal liability of legal entities of a partially recognized state, the Republic of Kosovo. Its main acts are the Criminal Code of the Republic of Kosovo, the special Law on the Liability of Legal Entities for Criminal Offenses and the Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Kosovo, which came into force on January 1, 2013. The publication reviews statutory resolutions allowing considering a legal entity a criminal liability subject; pays attention to the fact that legal entities in the Republic of Kosovo may be brought to criminal liability for any actions acknowledged as crimes by the national criminal laws with no exceptions; specifies articles of the General Part of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Kosovo, provisions of which are applied to bringing legal entities to criminal liability; reviews such criminal sanction types applicable to legal entities as a fi ne, liquidation of a legal entity, property forfeiture; analyzes circumstances considered at punishment imposition and the conditions for release from punishment. The author notes the criminal procedure peculiarities of bringing legal entities to liability.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document