scholarly journals Relationships between conceptions of learning approaches to study and students' judgements about the value of their experiences of networked learning

2003 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Goodyear ◽  
Mireia Asensio ◽  
Chris Jones ◽  
Christine Steeples ◽  
Vivien Hodgson
Keyword(s):  
Practical Implication ◽  
Networked Learning ◽  
Learning Approaches ◽  
Science Students ◽  
Deep Approach ◽  
Conceptions Of Learning ◽  
Approach To Learning ◽  
Deep Approach To Learning ◽  
Approaches To Study ◽  
Positive Experiences

This paper reports on an enquiry into relationships between students' views of their experiences of participating in networked learning courses and data on their conceptions of learning and approaches to study. It has been suggested in the literature on networked learning that students with more sophisticated conceptions of learning and students who take a deep approach to learning are more likely to benefit from, and have positive experiences of, networked learning. Drawing on a sample of almost 180 undergraduate social science students on four networked learning courses, we established that there were no strong links between students' judgements about their experience of networked learning and either their conceptions of learning or their approach to study. Further research is needed, but a practical implication of this study is that it is reasonable to expect all students to have positive experiences on well-designed and well-managed networked learning courses - not just those students with more sophisticated conceptions of learning or deep approaches to study.DOI:10.1080/0968776030110103

scholarly journals STUDENT'S CONCEPTS OF AND APPROACHES TO LEARNING AND THE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN THEM

2020 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 620-632
Author(s):  
Mohammad Ahmad Alkhateeb ◽  
Osamah Abdel Qader Bani Milhem
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Content Analysis ◽  
Approaches To Learning ◽  
Learning Approaches ◽  
Deep Approach ◽  
Conceptions Of Learning ◽  
Surface Approach ◽  
Approach To Learning ◽  
Deep Approach To Learning ◽  
Study Population ◽  
Surface Approach To Learning

The study attempted to characterize students’ conceptions of learning and approaches to learning and revealing the correlation between the students’ concepts and approaches to learning. The researchers used qualitative content analysis and a descriptive approach. The study population comprised 90 male and female students of the Faculty of Educational Science in the HU University, Jordan, during the 2019/2020 academic year. The quantitative concepts were dominating among students (87.77%), especially the concept of learning as a knowledge increase (33.33%). On the other hand, the qualitative concepts of learning were low (12.22%), especially on the person change (2.22%). In addition, there was an emergence of a new concept of learning outside the traditional concepts, namely learning as exam preparation. The results showed that the deep approach to learning was low, and the surface approach to learning was high. The results further showed a correlation between the quantitative concepts of learning and the surface approach to learning, as well as a correlation between the qualitative concepts of learning the deep approach to learning. Hence, the general conclusion implies that if teachers are to place learners at the heart of the learning process, they must be aware of the concepts of learning and learning approaches of the students.

scholarly journals Learning Approaches of Undergraduate Computer Technology Students: Strategies for Improvement

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suseela Malakolunthu ◽  
Alice Joshua
Keyword(s):  
Approaches To Learning ◽  
Statistical Correlation ◽  
Mean Value ◽  
Learning Approaches ◽  
Deep Approach ◽  
Approach To Learning ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Deep Approach To Learning ◽  
Study Process ◽  
Almost All

Purpose – In recent times, quality of graduates and their performance has been questioned. Students’ performance is an indicator of the kind of approach (deep or surface) that is taken. This study investigates the kind of undergraduates take in their learning processes.   Methodology – This quantitative survey used Revised Two-Factor Study Process Questionnaire (R-SPQ-2F). Sixty-three students participated in the study. Findings – Results showed no significant difference between the types of approach by gender, nationality, year of study, and major. However, the rank ordering of the mean value indicated that almost all the students who participated in the study did not possess a deep approach to learning. The Pearson’s r analysis revealed a weak negative statistical correlation between the deep and surface approaches to learning and weak positive statistical correlation between surface strategy and deep approach. However, a significant relationship between deep strategy and deep approach (r = .903**, p < .01) was found.   Significance – The lack of deep approach to learning among students can be attributed to factors such as the conditions of learning, professional capacity of teachers, and lack of instructional rigor in the program or coursework. It is imperative that emphasis is placed on using deep approaches to learning in the university courses so that deep learning experiences are created for students.

scholarly journals Relation between learning approaches of chemistry students and their achievement in general chemistry

2019 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stanislava Olić Ninković ◽  
Jasna Adamov ◽  
Ljiljana Vojinović Ješić
Keyword(s):  
Approaches To Learning ◽  
First Year ◽  
Learning Approaches ◽  
Deep Approach ◽  
Approach To Learning ◽  
Chemistry Students ◽  
Deep Approach To Learning ◽  
Novi Sad ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Learning Chemistry

This research was conducted with the aim of investigating the relationship between students’ approaches to learning chemistry and their levels of achievement. The sample was comprised of 46 students in the first year of the Faculty of Sciences in Novi Sad (Serbia). The research involved two instruments: a knowledge test and an instrument for assessing the learning approach. The results showed that students have difficulties in understanding the factors that influence the chemical equilibrium, as well as with writing equations of the chemical reaction of salt hydrolysis. Most students use a deep approach to learning chemistry content. The deep approach significantly correlates with student achievement. On the basis of these results, it is concluded that is important to create a climate in the classroom that will encourage a deep approach to the study of chemistry.

scholarly journals Do Learning Approaches Set the Stage for Emotional Well-Being in College Students?

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (17) ◽  
pp. 6984
Author(s):  
Jesús de la Fuente ◽  
Francisco Javier Peralta-Sánchez ◽  
José Manuel Martínez-Vicente ◽  
Flavia H. Santos ◽  
Salvatore Fadda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Approaches To Learning ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Personality Factors ◽  
Learning Approaches ◽  
Achievement Emotions ◽  
Approach To Learning ◽  
Ex Post ◽  
Ex Post Facto ◽  
Deep Approach To Learning ◽  
Linear Predictors

The research aim of this paper was two-fold: to generate evidence that personality factors are linear predictors of the variable approaches to learning (a relevant cognitive-motivational variable of Educational Psychology); and to show that each type of learning approach differentially predicts positive or negative achievement emotions, in three learning situations: class time, study time, and testing. A total of 658 university students voluntarily completed validated questionnaires referring to these three variables. Using an ex post facto design, we conducted correlational analyses, regression analyses, and multiple structural predictions. The results showed that Conscientiousness is associated with and predicts a Deep Approach to learning, while also predicting positive achievement emotions. By contrast, Neuroticism is associated with and significantly predicts a Surface Approach to learning, as well as negative achievement emotions. There are important psychoeducational implications in the university context, both for prevention and for self-improvement, and for programs that offer psychoeducational guidance.

Improving simulation-based learning of a practical skill in nursing education

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-50
Author(s):  
Monika Ravik
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Education ◽  
Nursing Students ◽  
Ways Of Knowing ◽  
Skill Learning ◽  
Practical Nursing ◽  
Deep Approach ◽  
Peripheral Vein ◽  
Approach To Learning ◽  
Vein Cannulation ◽  
Deep Approach To Learning

ABSTRACTBackground: Many newly qualified nurses lack competence in practical nursing skills. Peripheral vein cannulation is particularly challenging to learn and perform. Skill learning is often developed from a reproduction and memorizing of knowledge and guidelines. Learning peripheral vein cannulation associated with successful placement require a more thorough and deeper approach to learning.Framework: Marton and Saljö’s ways of knowing, a surface and a deep approach to learning can be used during peripheral vein cannulation learning to guide development and competence in this practical nursing skill.Aim: The aim of this theoretical article was to provide knowledge and understanding about two approaches to skill learning, a surface and a deep, and how they can contribute to learning of peripheral vein cannulation.Conclusion: Nursing students learning of peripheral vein cannulation influence pedagogy choice by supervisors. Contextual factors, such as supervisors, influences learning opportunities and development of PVC competence.Key words: vein cannulation, nursing education, learning, surface approach to learning, deep approach to learning.

scholarly journals Calculus Self-Efficacy Inventory: Its Development and Relationship with Approaches to learning

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 170 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yusuf F. Zakariya ◽  
Simon Goodchild ◽  
Kirsten Bjørkestøl ◽  
Hans K. Nilsen
Keyword(s):  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Quantitative Research ◽  
Approaches To Learning ◽  
Deep Approach ◽  
Surface Approach ◽  
Approach To Learning ◽  
Economics Students ◽  
Exploratory Factor Analyses ◽  
Deep Approach To Learning ◽  
Surface Approach To Learning

This study was framed within a quantitative research methodology to develop a concise measure of calculus self-efficacy with high psychometric properties. A survey research design was adopted in which 234 engineering and economics students rated their confidence in solving year-one calculus tasks on a 15-item inventory. The results of a series of exploratory factor analyses using minimum rank factor analysis for factor extraction, oblique promin rotation, and parallel analysis for retaining extracted factors revealed a one-factor solution of the model. The final 13-item inventory was unidimensional with all eigenvalues greater than 0.42, an average communality of 0.74, and a 62.55% variance of the items being accounted for by the latent factor, i.e., calculus self-efficacy. The inventory was found to be reliable with an ordinal coefficient alpha of 0.90. Using Spearman’ rank coefficient, a significant positive correlation ρ ( 95 ) =   0.27 ,   p <   0.05 (2-tailed) was found between the deep approach to learning and calculus self-efficacy, and a negative correlation ρ ( 95 ) =   − 0.26 ,   p <   0.05 (2-tailed) was found between the surface approach to learning and calculus self-efficacy. These suggest that students who adopt the deep approach to learning are confident in dealing with calculus exam problems while those who adopt the surface approach to learning are less confident in solving calculus exam problems.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document