INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS OWNERS PRIVILEGES

2020 ◽  
pp. 6-18
Author(s):  
ARTEM VASILIEV
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Common Elements ◽  
Property Owner ◽  
Property Owners ◽  
Legal Position

Author argues as justified grating by law intellectual property owners numerous statutory privileges compared with other property rights owners. On the basis of analysis of common elements of regime of intellectual property objects author comes to conclusion that legal position of intellectual property owner is unbalanced.

scholarly journals Digital Watermarking Security

2011 ◽  
Vol 61 (5) ◽  
pp. 408 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Blake ◽  
Shahram Latifi
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Digital Watermarking ◽  
Design Problem ◽  
The State ◽  
Science Journal ◽  
Property Owners ◽  
Digital Formats

<p>As creative works (e.g. books, films, music, photographs) become increasingly available in digital formats in a highly connected world, it also becomes increasingly difficult to secure intellectual property rights. Digital watermarking is one potential technology to aid intellectual property owners in controlling and tracking the use of their works. Surveys the state of digital watermarking research and examines the attacks that the technology faces and how it fares against them. Digital watermarking is an inherently difficult design problem subject to many constraints. The technology currently faces an uphill battle to be secure against relatively simple attacks.</p><p><strong>Defence Science Journal, 2011, 61(5), pp.408-414</strong><strong><strong>, DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.14429/dsj.61.1176</strong></strong></p>

Calculation Of Material And Moral Damage Caused To The Author Of The Composition

2021 ◽  
Vol 03 (06) ◽  
pp. 132-140
Author(s):  
Ulugbek Kholmurodovich Isanov ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
Topical Issue ◽  
Legal Science ◽  
Property Owners ◽  
Moral Damage ◽  
New Challenges

It is known that the protection of intellectual property rights and rights to it is an important factor in the development of this sector, increasing its investment attractiveness. After all, the formation of a class of intellectual property owners and the development of the necessary legal framework pose new challenges to the legal science as a topical issue today.

scholarly journals BRIDGING THE HUMAN RIGHT TO CLEAN WATER AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS ON WATER TECHNOLOGY IN INDIA

2018 ◽  
pp. 237-252
Author(s):  
Amishi Patel ◽  
Bhavesh Bharad
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Clean Water ◽  
Human Beings ◽  
Human Right ◽  
Property Owners ◽  
Alternative Sources ◽  
Limited Period

India, country which has unproportionate distribution of clean water, land and population, is facing growing scarcity of water. No rain for about 200 days at a stretch in city like Chennai is recent example of worst water crisis in 30 years. Many cities particularly those using single source of water that are climate dependent, are looking for alternative sources of water supply. Patent on water technology are on rise. Intellectual Property guarantee monopoly rights to the owner for limited period of time. Human Right to access to Clean Water at affordable rates is a Basic Fundamental Right for all human beings. Intellectual Property Rights are also recognised one of the Human Rights by various international and national instruments. Intellectual Property Rights in recent years have become increasingly relevant in current times. The paper tries to interconnect the Human Right to Clean Water and Intellectual Property Rights law. The paper includes constitutional and judicial perspective on clean water as human right and patent on water technology as one of the important intellectual property which can play a major role in solving the global problem of access to clean water. Lastly, the paper gives suggestions and recommendations to strike a balance between the rights of intellectual property owners and human rights of clean water.

Ch.4 Objectives and Principles

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Correa Carlos Maria
Keyword(s):  
Developing Countries ◽  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Technological Innovation ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Transfer Of Technology ◽  
Property Owners ◽  
Dissemination Of Technology

This chapter looks at the objectives and principles of the Trade-related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) Agreement. The primary objective of the proponents of the Agreement was to secure the rights of intellectual property owners to exploit their protected assets in the jurisdiction of all parties to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). They emphasized the role of the protection of intellectual property rights (IPRs) as incentives for innovation, and were keen to leave issues relating to the exploitation of the rights to the discretion of title-holders. In contrast, developing countries feared that a strengthened IPR protection would give too much power to title-holders and limit access to, and transfer of, technology to those countries. Article 7 of the Agreement, based on a proposal submitted by developing countries, represents a compromise between these two positions. It states that IPRs should contribute to the promotion of technological innovation and to the transfer and dissemination of technology.

The role of institutions in mediating the use of intellectual property rights has long been neglected in debates over the economics of intellectual property. In a path-breaking work, Rob Merges studied what he calls "collective rights organizations, " industry groups that collect intellectual property rights from owners and license them as a package. Merges finds that these organizations ease some of the tensions created by strong intellectual property rights by allowing industries to bargain from a property rule into a liability rule. Collective rights organizations thus play a valuable role in facilitating transactions in intellectual property rights. There is another sort of organization that mediates between intellectual property owners and users, however. Standard-setting organizations (SS0s) regularly encounter situations in which one or more companies claim to own proprietary rights that cover a proposed industry standard. The industry cannot adopt the standard without the permission of the intellectual property owner (or owners). Given the importance of SSO rules governing intellectual property rights, there has been surprisingly little treatment of SSOs or their intellectual property rules in the legal literature. My aim in this article is to fill that void. To do so, I have surveyed the intellectual property policies qJ_ dozens of SS0s, primarily but not exclusively in the Antitrust, intellectual property and standard setting organizations

2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.A. Lemley
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Standard Setting ◽  
Liability Rule ◽  
Collective Rights ◽  
Industry Standard ◽  
Legal Literature ◽  
Property Owners

PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP KARYA SENI BATIK YANG BELUM TERDAFTAR MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 28 TAHUN 2014 TENTANG HAK CIPTA

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Inggrit Fernandes
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Cultural Heritage ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Rapid Growth ◽  
Economic Value ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Property Law ◽  
Market Demand ◽  
Work Of Art

Batik artwork is one of the treasures of the nation's cultural heritage. Batik artwork is currently experiencing rapid growth. The amount of interest and market demand for this art resulted batik artwork became one of the commodities in the country and abroad. Thus, if the batik artwork is not protected then the future can be assured of a new conflict arises in the realm of intellectual property law. Act No. 28 of 2014 on Copyright has accommodated artwork batik as one of the creations that are protected by law. So that this work of art than as a cultural heritage also have economic value for its creator. Then how the legal protection of the batik artwork yaang not registered? Does this also can be protected? While in the registration of intellectual property rights is a necessity so that it has the force of law to the work produced

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document