Faculty Opinions recommendation of Prognostic significance of p16INK4A and human papillomavirus in patients with oropharyngeal cancer treated on TROG 02.02 phase III trial.

Purpose To determine the prognostic importance of p16 and human papillomavirus (HPV) in patients with oropharyngeal cancer treated on a phase III concurrent chemoradiotherapy trial. Patients and Methods Patients with stage III or IV head and neck squamous cell cancer were randomly assigned to concurrent radiotherapy and cisplatin with or without tirapazamine. In this substudy, analyses were restricted to patients with oropharyngeal cancer. p16 was detected by immunohistochemistry, and HPV was detected by in situ hybridization and polymerase chain reaction. Results Slides were available for p16 assay in 206 of 465 patients, of which 185 were eligible, and p16 and HPV were evaluable in 172 patients. One hundred six (57%) of 185 were p16-positive, and in patients evaluable for both p16 and HPV, 88 (86%) of 102 p16-positive patients were also HPV-positive. Patients who were p16-positive had lower T and higher N categories and better Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status. p16-positive tumors compared with p16-negative tumors were associated with better 2-year overall survival (91% v 74%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.36; 95% CI, 0.17 to 0.74; P = .004) and failure-free survival (87% v 72%; HR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.20 to 0.74; P = .003). p16 was a significant prognostic factor on multivariable analysis (HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.21 to 0.96; P = .04). p16-positive patients had lower rates of locoregional failure and deaths due to other causes. There was a trend favoring the tirapazamine arm for improved locoregional control in p16-negative patients (HR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.09 to 1.24; P = .13). Conclusion HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer is a distinct entity with a favorable prognosis compared with HPV-negative oropharyngeal cancer when treated with cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy.

Download Full-text

Prognostic significance of HPV and p16 status in patients with oropharyngeal cancer treated on a large international phase III trial

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2009.27.15_suppl.6004 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. 6004-6004 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

D. Rischin ◽

R. Young ◽

R. Fisher ◽

S. Fox ◽

Q. Le ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Oropharyngeal Cancer ◽

Cox Regression ◽

Cell Cancer ◽

Prognostic Significance ◽

Phase Iii ◽

Tumor Control ◽

Eligibility Criteria ◽

Cytoplasmic Staining ◽

Phase Iii Trial ◽

Hpv Status

6004 Background: Previous studies have reported that in patients with oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) the presence of human papilloma virus (HPV) is associated with an improved prognosis. We sought to determine the prognostic importance of HPV and p16 in patients with OPC treated with concurrent chemoradiation on a large international phase III trial. Methods: Patients with previously untreated Stage III or IV head and neck squamous cell cancer were randomized to receive definitive radiotherapy concurrently with either cisplatin or cisplatin plus tirapazamine. In this substudy, analyses were restricted to patients with OPC who received > 60 Gy and did not have major radiation deviations predicted to impact on tumor control. HPV 16/18 were detected by in situ hybridization and scored as detected or undetected. p16 was detected by immunohistochemistry. Nuclear and cytoplasmic staining intensity of tumor cells was scored as grade 0–3, with grade 2 and 3 called positive. Log rank and Cox regression used for survival analyses. p values were 2-sided . Results: 384 out of 861 patients had OPC and met the eligibility criteria. Slides were available for HPV assay in 195 and for p16 in 186, and for both in 173. 54/195 (28%) were HPV positive, 107/186 (58%) were p16 positive. HPV pos tumors were associated with better 2-year overall survival (OS) (94 v 77%, p = 0.007) and better failure-free survival (FFS) (86 v 75%, p = 0.035) compared to HPV neg tumors. Similarly p16 pos tumors were associated with better 2-year OS (92 v 75%, p = 0.004) and FFS (87 v 72%, p = 0.003) compared to p16 neg . After adjustment for stage, Hb and ECOG PS, HPV pos had better OS than HPV neg (HR 0.29, p = 0.018), and p16 pos had better OS than p16 neg (HR 0.39, p = 0.013). When the HPV and p16 results were combined the relative HRs for OS were: HPVpos/p16pos 0.35 (45 patients, 26% of cases), HPVpos/p16neg 0 (3pts, 2%), HPVneg/p16pos 0.73 (58pts, 33%), HPVneg/p16neg 1.79 (67 pts, 39%). Conclusions: Our results confirm the prognostic significance of tumor HPV status in oropharyngeal cancer treated with chemoradiation, but also show that p16 identifies a larger group with an improved prognosis. The HPV neg/p16 pos population has a better prognosis compared to patients with HPV neg/p16 neg tumors. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Download Full-text

EP-1180: Public involvement in design of a phase III trial comparing IMPT and IMRT for oropharyngeal cancer

Radiotherapy and Oncology ◽

10.1016/s0167-8140(18)31490-7 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 127 ◽

pp. S661

Author(s):

C. Hague ◽

B. Foran ◽

E. Hall ◽

L. Lee ◽

R. Mackay ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Oropharyngeal Cancer ◽

Public Involvement ◽

Phase Iii ◽

Phase Iii Trial

Download Full-text

Impact of p16 status on the QOL effects of chemoradiation for locally advanced oropharynx cancer: Results of TROG 02.02.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.5571 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. 5571-5571 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Jolie Ringash ◽

Richard Fisher ◽

Lester J. Peters ◽

Brian O'Sullivan ◽

Andy Trotti ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Oropharyngeal Cancer ◽

Locally Advanced ◽

Phase Iii ◽

Phase Iii Trial ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Ecog Ps ◽

The Impact ◽

Subsequent Time Point

5571 Background: We report the impact of p16 status on quality of life (QOL) for patients with stage III or IV (excluding T1-2N1 and M1) squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx (OPC) treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy in a large international phase III trial (TROG 02.02/HeadSTART). Methods: The 861 patients accrued received definitive radiotherapy (RT) (70 Gy/7 weeks) concurrently with 3 cycles of either cisplatin (100mg/m2) or cisplatin (75 mg/m2) plus tirapazamine (290 mg/m2/day) by random assignment, as previously described. QOL was measured with the FACT-H&N at baseline, 2,6,12, 23 and 38 months. No significant difference in overall or subscale QOL score change from baseline was observed between arms at any subsequent time point; results for the oropharynx subgroup by p16 status are reported for both treatment arms combined. Results: Of 853 eligible participants, 465 had OPC, for whom p16 status could be determined in 206. Of 179 who received adequate RT (≥ 60 Gy, no major deviations) and completed baseline QOL, 104 were p16+ and 79 were p16-. p16+ patients had better baseline ECOG PS, lower T-category, higher N-category, were younger and were less likely to be current smokers. Baseline mean FACT-H&N score was statistically and clinically significantly better in p16+ patients (111 vs. 102, p=0.001). The drop in QOL from baseline to 2 months was more severe in p16+ cases (-20.4 vs -9.1, p=0.001), resulting in an equalization of 2 month scores (p16+: 90.6, p16-: 93.6, p=0.16). At 6 and 12 months post-treatment, no difference in score changes from baseline by p16 status was seen (6 mo, p16+: -6.2, p16 -:-1.2, p=0.22; 12 mo, p16 +: -0.3, p16 -: +2.0, p=0.82). Conclusions: p16 associated oropharyngeal cancer has been shown to be a distinct entity with different demographic features. In our study, such patients exhibited better baseline QOL and a more severe drop immediately after treatment, but did not differ in long-term QOL response to the effects of aggressive concurrent chemoradiation. Given the favorable prognosis of p16-associated oropharyngeal cancer, efforts to reduce the QOL burden of treatment are warranted.

Download Full-text