Faculty Opinions recommendation of A case study of discordant overlapping meta-analyses: vitamin d supplements and fracture.

Author(s):  
Adam Jacobs
2014 ◽  
Vol 99 (11) ◽  
pp. 4265-4272 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark J. Bolland ◽  
Andrew Grey ◽  
Ian R. Reid

Nutrients ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 964 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olive Tang ◽  
Stephen Juraschek ◽  
Lawrence Appel

Recent guidelines have advocated against the use of vitamin D supplementation as a means to prevent falls in older adults. However, meta-analyses of the available trials have reached divergent conclusions, and the key design features of these trials have not been well characterized. We conducted a systematic review of 30 randomized trials that reported the effects of vitamin D supplements on falls. Trials were identified by reviewing references of published meta-analyses and updated with a systematic PubMed search. We assessed three key design features: (1) recruitment of participants with vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency; (2) provision of daily oral vitamin D supplementation; and (3) utilization of highly sensitive at-event falls ascertainment. The trials enrolled a median of 337 (IQR: 170-1864) participants. Four (13.3%) trials restricted enrollment to those who were at least vitamin D insufficient, 18 (60.0%) included at least one arm providing daily supplementation, and 16 (53.3%) used at-event reporting. There was substantial heterogeneity between trials, and no single trial incorporated all three key design features. Rather than concluding that vitamin D is ineffective as a means to prevent falls, these findings suggest that existing trial evidence is insufficient to guide recommendations on the use of vitamin D supplements to prevent falls.


2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (8) ◽  
pp. 2637-2639 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. J. Bolland ◽  
A. Avenell ◽  
A. Grey ◽  
I. R. Reid

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
William J. Burns ◽  
August E. Shapiro ◽  
Yvonne Demsky ◽  
Kayreen A. Burns

2020 ◽  
Vol 58 (8) ◽  
pp. 1302-1313 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anwar Borai ◽  
Kiyoshi Ichihara ◽  
Abdulaziz Masaud ◽  
Waleed Tamimi ◽  
Suhad Bahijri ◽  
...  

AbstractBackgroundThis is a second part of report on the IFCC global multicenter study conducted in Saudi Arabia to derive reference intervals (RIs) for 20 immunoassay analytes including five tumor makers, five reproductive, seven other hormones and three vitamins.MethodsA total of 826 apparently healthy individuals aged ≥18 years were recruited in three clinical laboratories located in western, central and eastern Saudi Arabia using the protocol specified for the global study. All serum specimens were measured using Abbott, Architect analyzers. Multiple regression analysis (MRA) was performed to explore sources of variation of each analyte: age, body mass index (BMI), physical exercise and smoking. The magnitude of variation of reference values (RVs) attributable to sex, age and region was calculated by ANOVA as a standard deviation ratio (SDR). RIs were derived by the parametric (P) method.ResultsMRA revealed that region, smoking and exercise were not relevant sources of variation for any analyte. Based on SDR and actual between-sex differences in upper limits (ULs), we chose to partition RIs by sex for all analytes except for α-fetoprotein and parathyroid hormone (PTH). Age-specific RIs were required in females for ferritin, estradiol, progesterone, testosterone, follitropin, luteotropin and prolactin (PRL). With prominent BMI-related increase, RIs for insulin and C-peptide were derived after excluding individuals with BMI > 32 kg/m2. Individuals taking vitamin D supplements were excluded in deriving RIs for vitamin D and PTH.ConclusionsRIs of major immunoassay analytes specific for Saudi Arabians were established in careful consideration of various biological sources of variation.


2021 ◽  
Vol 49 ◽  
pp. 102760
Author(s):  
Steve Simpson-Yap ◽  
Pia Jelinek ◽  
Tracey Weiland ◽  
Nupur Nag ◽  
Sandra Neate ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document