scholarly journals EFEITOS DA TERAPIA POR ESPELHO NA FUNÇÃO DO MEMBRO SUPERIOR EM CRIANÇAS COM DIAGNÓSTICO DE PARALISIA CEREBRAL HEMIPLÉGICA: UMA REVISÃO SISTEMÁTICA/ THE EFFECTS OF MIRROR THERAPY IN THE FUNCTION OF UPPER LIMB IN CHILDRENS DIAGNOSED WITH UNILATERAL CEREBRAL PALSY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (11) ◽  
pp. 86852-86859
Author(s):  
Aymee Lobato Brito ◽  
Evelyn Raiane Lima Pastana ◽  
Gabriel Henrique de Souza Figueiredo ◽  
Gislayne Cássia Marinho Carvalho ◽  
Leonardo Barros da Costa e Costa ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 61 (9) ◽  
pp. 1080-1086 ◽  
Author(s):  
Remo N Russo ◽  
Pawel P Skuza ◽  
Myriam Sandelance ◽  
Peter Flett

2017 ◽  
Vol 40 (12) ◽  
pp. 1361-1371 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Garbellini ◽  
Yvette Robert ◽  
Melinda Randall ◽  
Catherine Elliott ◽  
Christine Imms

2020 ◽  
pp. 026921552095193
Author(s):  
Alberto Saavedra-García ◽  
Jose A Moral-Munoz ◽  
David Lucena-Anton

Objective: To evaluate the current evidence on the effectiveness of simultaneous combination of mirror therapy and electrical stimulation in the recovery of upper limb motor function after stroke, compared with conventional therapy, mirror therapy or electrical stimulation isolated. Data sources: Articles published in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), Cochrane Central register of controlled trials and ScienceDirect up to July 2020. Review methods: The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were followed. Methodological quality was assessed using the PEDro tool. The RevMan 5.4 statistical software was used to obtain the meta-analysis, through the standardized mean difference and 95% confidence intervals (CI), and to evaluate the risk of bias. The GRADE approach was employed to assess the certainty of evidence. Results: Eight articles were included in this systematic review, seven were included in the meta-analysis. A total of 314 participants were analyzed. The overall quality of the articles included in this review was good. There was no overall significant mean difference on upper limb motor function after stroke using the Upper-Extremity Fugl-Meyer Assessment by 1.56 (95% CI = –2.08, 5.20; P = 0.40; moderate-certainty evidence) and the Box and Block Test results by 1.39 (95% CI = –2.14, 4.92; P = 0.44; high-certainty evidence). There was overall significant difference in the Action Research Arm Test by 3.54 (95% CI = 0.18, 6.90; P = 0.04; high-certainty evidence). Conclusion: Direct scientific evidence about the effectiveness of the combined therapy of mirror therapy and electrical stimulation simultaneously for the improvement of the upper limb motor function after stroke is lacking. Further high-quality and well-designed research is needed.


2020 ◽  
Vol 62 (5) ◽  
pp. 625-632 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Carolina de Campos ◽  
Theresa Sukal‐Moulton ◽  
Theodore Huppert ◽  
Katharine Alter ◽  
Diane L Damiano

2019 ◽  
Vol 66 (5) ◽  
pp. 552-567 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Burgess ◽  
Roslyn N. Boyd ◽  
Jenny Ziviani ◽  
Leanne Sakzewski

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emanuela Inguaggiato ◽  
Nadia Bolognini ◽  
Simona Fiori ◽  
Giovanni Cioni

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) is an emerging tool to improve upper limb motor functions after stroke acquired in adulthood; however, there is a paucity of reports on its efficacy for upper limb motor rehabilitation in congenital or early-acquired stroke. In this pilot study we have explored, for the first time, the immediate effects, and their short-term persistence, of a single application of anodal tDCS on chronic upper limb motor disorders in children and young individuals with Unilateral Cerebral Palsy (UCP). To this aim, in a crossover sham-controlled study, eight subjects aged 10-28 years with UCP underwent two sessions of active and sham tDCS. Anodal tDCS (1.5 mA, 20 min) was delivered over the primary motor cortex (M1) of the ipsilesional hemisphere. Results showed, only following the active stimulation, an immediate improvement in unimanual gross motor dexterity of hemiplegic, but not of nonhemiplegic, hand in Box and Block test (BBT). Such improvement remained stable for at least 90 minutes. Performance of both hands in Hand Grip Strength test was not modified by anodal tDCS. Improvement in BBT was unrelated to participants’ age or lesion size, as revealed by MRI data analysis. No serious adverse effects occurred after tDCS; some mild and transient side effects (e.g., headache, tingling, and itchiness) were reported in a limited number of cases. This study provides an innovative contribution to scientific literature on the efficacy and safety of anodal tDCS in UCP. This trial is registered with NCT03137940.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document