The Constitutional Issues and Future Tasks related to North Korea’s Intellectual Property and Science-technology System

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 75-124
Author(s):  
kyu-hong Lee
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Technology System ◽  
Science Technology

Science. Technology. Innovation

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natalia Gorodnikova ◽  
Leonid Gokhberg ◽  
Kirill Ditkovskiy ◽  
Irina Kuznetsova ◽  
Evgeniya Lukinova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
International Comparisons ◽  
Federal State ◽  
Output Data ◽  
Innovation Potential ◽  
Science Technology ◽  
Foreign Countries ◽  
Statistical Studies ◽  
Data Book ◽  
The Russian Federation

The pocket data book contains main indicators characterizing S&T and innovation potential of the Russian Federation. There are the information about intellectual property, S&T output, data of international comparisons given. The data book includes information of the Federal State Statistics Service, Federal Service for Intellectual Property, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Eurostat, UNESCO, World Intellectual Property Organisation, national statistical services of foreign countries, and results of own methodological and analytical studies of the HSE Institute for Statistical Studies and Economics of Knowledge. In some cases, the presented data specify those published earlier.

Part III Rights to Culture, Ch.11 Intellectual Property and Technologies: Article 31

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stoll Tobias
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Cultural Heritage ◽  
Traditional Knowledge ◽  
Indigenous Peoples ◽  
State Action ◽  
Technology And Culture ◽  
Science Technology ◽  
Cultural Expressions ◽  
Traditional Cultural Expressions

This chapter looks at the specific right to intellectual property and technologies in Article 31. Article 31 sets out a number of rights of indigenous peoples relating to their science, technology, and culture, and calls for State action in this regard, which is to be taken with the involvement of those peoples. The provision relates to three different subject matters, between which there obviously exists quite some overlap. It refers, first, to ‘cultural heritage, traditional knowledge and traditional cultural expressions’. Second, it refers to ‘intellectual property’ over such heritage, knowledge, and expressions, and third, to ‘manifestations of…sciences, technologies and cultures’ — representative examples of which find themselves included in an illustrative list. According to Article 31, with a view to each of these subject matters, indigenous peoples have a right to ‘maintain, control, protect and develop’.

scholarly journals Science. Technology. Innovation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonid Gokhberg ◽  
Kirill Ditkovskiy ◽  
Evgeniya Evnevich ◽  
Maxim Kotsemir ◽  
Irina Kuznetsova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Statistical Data ◽  
International Comparisons ◽  
Federal State ◽  
Science Technology ◽  
Statistical Studies ◽  
Data Book ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Innovation Indicators

This pocket data book contains main S&T and innovation indicators for the Russian Federation. The publication includes the most recent statistical data on R&D input and output, as well as international comparisons. The data book includes information of the Russian Federal State Statistics Service, Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation, Russian Federal Service for Intellectual Property (Rospatent), Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), European Statistical Office (Eurostat), UNESCO, World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO), national statistical offices of other countries, and results of own methodological and analytical studies of the HSE Institute for Statistical Studies and Economics of Knowledge. In some cases, 2019 data are preliminary.

Science. Technology. Innovation

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonid Gokhberg ◽  
Kirill Ditkovskiy ◽  
Maxim Kotsemir ◽  
Irina Kuznetsova ◽  
Evgeniya Lukinova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
International Comparisons ◽  
Federal State ◽  
Output Data ◽  
Innovation Potential ◽  
Science Technology ◽  
Foreign Countries ◽  
Statistical Studies ◽  
Data Book ◽  
The Russian Federation

The pocket data book contains main indicators characterizing S&T and innovation potential of the Russian Federation. There are the information about intellectual property, S&T output, data of international comparisons given. The data book includes information of the Federal State Statistics Service, Federal Service for Intellectual Property, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Eurostat, UNESCO, World Intellectual Property Organisation, national statistical services of foreign countries, and results of own methodological and analytical studies of the HSE Institute for Statistical Studies and Economics of Knowledge. In some cases, the presented data specify those published earlier.

scholarly journals Fostering place-based coalitions between social movements and science for sustainable urban environments: A case of embedded agency

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 1386-1411
Author(s):  
Matias Ramirez ◽  
Javier Hernando Garcia Estevez ◽  
Oscar Yandy Romero Goyeneche ◽  
Claudia E Obando Rodriguez
Keyword(s):  
Social Movements ◽  
Innovation System ◽  
Urban Environments ◽  
Regulatory Oversight ◽  
Technology System ◽  
Technology And Innovation ◽  
System A ◽  
Science Technology ◽  
Science Community ◽  
Science Technology And Innovation

The objective of this paper is to contribute to an important debate concerning the interaction between place-based social movements and the science, technology and innovation system. Our central proposition is that place-based social movements can facilitate unique local heterogeneous alliances with key actors of the science and technology system. A process of bricolage can emerge from these alliances whereby social movements are supported by the technical knowledge of the science community, and in turn, the priorities of the scientists are influenced by the agendas of the social movements, leading to new forms of knowledge production. We build on this to argue that these place-based engagements can create significant agency towards changes in socio-technical and socio-ecological systems in urban environments, especially in societies where regulatory oversight is weaker and social movements in areas that overlap science, technology and innovation are a common expression of civil society demand for change. Our argument is developed through a study of a social movement in defence of an urban wetland in Bogota.

scholarly journals México and the TPP: a critical view on diversification and intellectual property

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-23
Author(s):  
Juan Felipe López Aymes
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Value Chains ◽  
Critical View ◽  
Domestic Science ◽  
Science Technology ◽  
Full Production ◽  
President Elect ◽  
The Government ◽  
Partnership Agreement ◽  
Science Technology And Innovation

The Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement was signed on February 4, 2016. The published text confirmed some fears but also brought relief as the details of what had been negotiated became publicly known. This paper attempts to contribute to the discussion with a critical view of the Agreement, although not necessarily in equivalence to US President-elect Donald Trump negative stand, but one of a developing country. The main argument holds that joining the TPP, or any other agreement alike, is not advisable unless Mexican industries are in a condition to compete. The line of reasoning is double-faceted: First, gains from the alleged diversification are insignificant, so handing over policy autonomy for development in exchange for access to negligible markets is not beneficial; second, its strong intellectual property rules would further hinder the policy space of the government for designing and implementing domestic science, technology and innovation programs. This would place Mexico at a disadvantage with regard to its prospects for a higher position in global production and value chains, not to mention develop full production chains led by national firms. As it is presently formulated, the Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement would consolidate a structure of dependence and income inequality, two problems which Mexico is striving to overcome.

scholarly journals IP protection by criminal law – A necessity for the development of science, technology, innovation and creativity in Vietnam

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-30
Author(s):  
Vien The Giang
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Growth Model ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Technology Innovation ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Science Technology ◽  
Ip Law ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Plant Breeders Rights

The paper attempts to clarify the relationship between the Criminal Code and Intellectual Property (IP) Law in determining whether an IP infringement is a crime. The results show that the determination of an IP crime as specified in 2015 Criminal Code (amended in 2017) is yet to reflect the connotation of IP as specified in 2005 IP Law (amended in 2009). This practice requires a supplement of “the plant breeders’ rights” for a comprehensive protection of IP. This requirement is of significance in creating a motivation for creative activities which contribute to the shift to technology-based growth model, innovation and creativity in Vietnam.

La propiedad intelectual generada por la investigación universitaria. Un nuevo marco normativo

2014 ◽  
pp. 2045-2068
Author(s):  
Reyes MARZAL RAGA
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Important Change ◽  
University Research ◽  
Technology And Innovation ◽  
Science Technology ◽  
Sustainable Economy ◽  
The University ◽  
Science Technology And Innovation

LABURPENA: Bai ekonomia jasangarriari buruzko martxoaren 4ko 2/2011 Legeak eta bai Zientzia, Teknologia eta Berrikuntzari buruzko ekainaren 1eko 14/2011 Legeak aldaketa handia ekarri dute unibertsitate-ikerketatik sortutako jabetza intelektualaren araubidean. Funtsean, legearen ministerio bidez, aldaketek Unibertsitateari ematen diote Unibertsitatearen baitan sortutako jabetza intelektuala ustiatzeko eskubidearen titulartasuna, eta araubide berezi bat ematen die ondasun higiezin horiei, ondare-ondasun gisa. RESUMEN: La Ley 2/2011, de 4 de marzo, de Economía Sostenible y la Ley 14/2011, de 1 de junio, de la Ciencia, la Tecnología y la Innovación han introducido una importante modificación en el régimen de propiedad intelectual generada por la investigación universitaria. En esencia, los cambios atribuyen a la Universidad, por ministerio de la ley, la titularidad de los derechos de explotación de la propiedad intelectual surgida en el seno de la Universidad y fijan un régimen propio y singular para tales bienes inmateriales, en su consideración de bienes patrimoniales. ABSTRACT: Act 2/2011 of March 4th, on Sustainable Economy and Act 14/2011 of June 1st, on Science, Technology and Innovation have introduced an important change on the regime of intelectual property generated by University research. In essence, by operation of law the changes confer the Universities the ownership of rights of exploitation of the intellectual property that come from the University and they fix an own and singular regime for those immaterial goods as their quality of assets.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document