scholarly journals Management and Treatment of Drooling: Focus on Non-Invasive Therapy for Children

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 111-120
Author(s):  
Kyoung-chul Min ◽  
Sang-min Seo ◽  
Hee-soon Woo
2011 ◽  
Vol 27 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. OP53_4
Author(s):  
Takashi Yamada ◽  
Masao Ooshima ◽  
Kohtaro Okamoto ◽  
Yasue Tashima ◽  
Takaomi Shiroshita ◽  
...  

RSC Advances ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 4744-4750 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gaurav Pandey ◽  
Sudhir Morla ◽  
Harshal B. Nemade ◽  
Sachin Kumar ◽  
Vibin Ramakrishnan

Potential use of electric field as a non-invasive therapeutic option against Alzheimer's disease, by modulating the aggregation kinetics and morphology of tau protein.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dong-Yu Li ◽  
Shao-Jun Liu ◽  
Ting-Ting Yu ◽  
Zhang Liu ◽  
Si-Lin Sun ◽  
...  

AbstractIntraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) is the most fatal form of brain injury, yet a therapy directed at ameliorating intraventricular clot is very limited. There is accumulating evidence that an augmentation of the meningeal lymphatic (MLVs) functions might be a promising therapeutic target for IVH. In particular, the photostimulation (PS) of MLVs could be promising for non-invasive therapy of IVH via PS of clearance of red blood cells (RBCs) from the brain via MLVs. Indeed, we uncover that PS has therapeutic effects on IVH in mice reducing the mortality, improving the emotional status, accelerating the RBCs evacuation from the ventricles and increasing the ICP recovery. Our findings strongly suggest that the PS-mediated stimulation of drainage and clearing functions of MLVs can be a novel bedside, readily applicable and commercially viable technologies for treatment of IVH. These pilot results open new horizons in a non-invasive therapy of IVH via PS stimulation of regenerative lymphatic mechanisms.


2021 ◽  
Vol In Press (In Press) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amnon A. Berger ◽  
Yao Liu ◽  
Luke Mosel ◽  
Kristin A. Champagne ◽  
Miriam T. Ruoff ◽  
...  

Context: Neck pain is a common phenomenon and affects a large segment of the population. Chronic neck pain, lasting more than 3 months, likely occurs in 10% - 30% of patients with acute neck pain and affects up to 288 million cases globally, carrying a significant cost in terms of quality of life, disability, and healthcare dollars. Here we review neck pain background, acupuncture and the evidence that exist to support acupuncture use in chronic neck pain. Results: Neck pain not only affects quality of life directly, but also contributes to depression, job dissatisfaction and reduced productivity. Unfortunately, neck pain is strongly linked to office and computer work and is likely to continue increasing in prevalence. Traditional treatments, such as analgesics, physical therapy, exercise, and non-invasive therapy bring some relief, and invasive therapy is indicated if anatomical pathologies exist. Acupuncture is a form of integrative medicine, originally described and practiced in traditional Chinese medicine and now expanded to include methods including acupressure, dry needling, and others. Traditionally, it focused on restoring the patient’s flow of Qi by puncturing specific points along the meridians. It has previously been shown to be effective in other forms of chronic pain and disability. Clinical trials studying acupuncture for neck pain have shown significant reduction in both pain and associated symptoms. These therapies are reviewed in this text. Conclusions: Neck pain is a common and significant global problem. Acupuncture, dry needling, and cupping were all shown to be effective in alleviating pain both immediately after treatment, as well as provide long-lasting relief. These treatments are generally safe and inexpensive and should be considered as part of a multimodal approach for the treatment of neck pain. More head-to-head studies will provide better data to support a choice of a specific treatment over another.


2010 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 81-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monica Elman ◽  
Itzhak Vider ◽  
Yoram Harth ◽  
Varda Gottfried ◽  
Avner Shemer

2011 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emma Salt ◽  
Chris Wright ◽  
Sue Kelly ◽  
Allison Dean

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. e16-e19
Author(s):  
Musaab Yassin ◽  
Abigail Cressey ◽  
Louise Goldsmith ◽  
Ben Turney ◽  
John Reynard

Ureteroscopy and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) are two widely used methods for the treatment of ureteric and pelviureteric junction (PUJ) stones. ESWL remains the only non-invasive therapy modality for the treatment of urinary stones. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is a non-invasive, safe and effective treatment for urinary tract lithiasis Ureteroscopy and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) are two widely used methods for the treatment of ureteric and pelviureteric junction (PUJ) stones. ESWL remains the only non-invasive therapy modality for the treatment of urinary stones. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is a non-invasive,safe and effective treatment for urinary tract lithiasis ObjectivesTo evaluate the effectiveness of emergency “hot” shock wave lithotripsy in treating symptomatic ureteric/ PUJ stones. Materials and MethodsA retrospective study looking at the emergency referrals for shock wave lithotripsy to the Churchill Hos-pital between June 2013 to Dec 2017. The Lithotripsy Database and patients’ electronic records were used to complete this project. Emergency referrals triaged by the on-call urology team and go through a renal colic clinic. ResultsIn total, 201 patients underwent emergency shock wave lithotripsy for ureteric/PUJ stones.The mean stone size was 7.7mm (SD 2.9). 12.4% (25) were PUJ, 45.3% (91) proximal and 42.3% (85) distal ureteric stones. 1% (2) were bilateral ureteric stones. 9% (18) had previous lithotripsy treatment before being referred.The number of shocks used was 4000 in 52.7%, >=3000 in 40.3%, >=2000 in 4.5% and >=1000 in 2.5%. The median shock frequency was 2 Hz. The median number of treatments for the targeted stone was 2. Stone fragmentation was visible in 27.4% (55), possible in 30.8% (62) and not visible in 41.8% (84).In terms of follow up, 48.3% (97) were discharged stone-free, while 17.4% (35) were discharged with residual fragments. 21.8% (44) had further clinic follow up while 12.4% (25) had no follow-up information available, possibly because they were referred from different hospitals. 19.9% (40) needed ureteroscopy, while 7% (14) needed further lithotripsy sessions. ConclusionsEmergency extracorporeal lithotripsy can be offered as an effective and safe treatment for patients with symptomatic stones.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document