scholarly journals A STUDY ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN STUDENTS’ READING ATTITUDES AND THEIR READING COMPREHENSION PERFORMANCE

2021 ◽  
Vol 226 (03) ◽  
pp. 28-33
Author(s):  
Nguyễn Thuỳ Linh

Mục đích của nghiên cứu này là tìm hiểu thái độ của sinh viên đối với việc học đọc và tìm ra mối quan hệ giữa thái độ của sinh viên đối với việc học kĩ năng đọc hiểu và kết quả đạt được. Phương pháp nghiên cứu được sử dụng để phân tích dữ liệu là bảng hỏi và bài kiểm tra đọc hiểu áp dụng cho sinh viên năm thứ 3, trường Đại học Công nghệ thông tin và Truyền thông – Đại học Thái Nguyên. Bên cạnh đó, hệ số tương quan cũng được sử dụng để tìm ra mối quan hệ giữa thái độ đọc của sinh viên với kết quả mà sinh viên đạt được. Kết quả nghiên cứu cho thấy thái độ của sinh viên đóng vai trò quan trọng khi học kỹ năng đọc và nghiên cứu cũng chỉ ra thái độ của sinh viên đối với việc học kĩ năng đọc và kết quả mà chúng đạt được có mối quan hệ mật thiết với nhau. Từ kết quả nghiên cứu, một số đề xuất cũng được đưa ra để nâng cao ý thức học đối với kĩ năng đọc và kết quả mà người học đạt được. 

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 78
Author(s):  
Christy L. Pagal ◽  
Jhon Kevin A. Mirafuentes ◽  
Quennie C. Ypanto

Students’ reading comprehension was found to be one of the major concerns with all teachers worldwide. It is essential to optimize students’ performance in all courses. Yet, we claimed that gender, and reading attitudes and practices could influence reading comprehensibility. We utilized descriptive-correlational design of quantitative research. Descriptive design was used to obtain the attributes of students’ reading attitudes and practices. Moreover, we used a correlational design to determine the relationship or association between and among attributes and their level of reading comprehension skills. We found out that students have a positive attitude towards reading when reading materials are educational and entertainment. In terms of the significant relationship between reading attitudes and practices, results reveal that reading attitude does not always affect reading practices. In terms of the relationship between student’s reading attitudes and practices and their levels of reading comprehension skills, student’s reading attitudes and practices have no significant relationships to all levels except between their reading attitudes and their comprehension skills in the Inferential Level. Lastly, in terms of the significant difference between male and female students’ reading comprehension skills, there is a statistical difference in the Literal and Evaluative Levels between the male and female. Thus, reading comprehension skills vary in these two levels. On the other hand, they showed no statistical difference in the Inferential and Critical Levels between the male and female. Therefore, the Literal and Evaluative Levels of male and female to reading comprehension skills are due to their reading attitudes and practices individually.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amanda Goodwin ◽  
Yaacov Petscher ◽  
Jamie Tock

Various models have highlighted the complexity of language. Building on foundational ideas regarding three key aspects of language, our study contributes to the literature by 1) exploring broader conceptions of morphology, vocabulary, and syntax, 2) operationalizing this theoretical model into a gamified, standardized, computer-adaptive assessment of language for fifth to eighth grade students entitled Monster, PI, and 3) uncovering further evidence regarding the relationship between language and standardized reading comprehension via this assessment. Multiple-group item response theory (IRT) across grades show that morphology was best fit by a bifactor model of task specific factors along with a global factor related to each skill. Vocabulary was best fit by a bifactor model that identifies performance overall and on specific words. Syntax, though, was best fit by a unidimensional model. Next, Monster, PI produced reliable scores suggesting language can be assessed efficiently and precisely for students via this model. Lastly, performance on Monster, PI explained more than 50% of variance in standardized reading, suggesting operationalizing language via Monster, PI can provide meaningful understandings of the relationship between language and reading comprehension. Specifically, considering just a subset of a construct, like identification of units of meaning, explained significantly less variance in reading comprehension. This highlights the importance of considering these broader constructs. Implications indicate that future work should consider a model of language where component areas are considered broadly and contributions to reading comprehension are explored via general performance on components as well as skill level performance.


Author(s):  
Muhammad Waleed Shehzad ◽  
Ishtiaq Hussain ◽  
Amer Akhtar ◽  
Saadia Fatima

Abstract The intended aim of this research was to identify the connection of Self-Efficacy Sources (SES) and Metacognitive Reading Strategies (MCRS) with Reading Comprehension (RC) by deploying reading Self-Efficacy Beliefs (SEB) as a mediating construct. A correlational design was utilized. Proportionate stratified random sampling was deployed to select a sample of 383 Saudi EFL university learners. Questionnaires and a reading comprehension test were employed to gather the data. Structural equation modelling was used to test the relationships. Results indicated that SES were substantially associated with SEB except physiological state. Moreover, all the three MCRS showed significant and positive association with SEB. Also, SEB were substantially associated with RC. Regarding mediation, it was discovered that SEB mediated the relationship among SES and RC except one source, i.e., physiological state. Moreover, SEB mediated the association between all the three MCRS and RC. This study provides several implications for learners, teachers, and policymakers. Keywords: Metacognitive Reading Strategies, Self-efficacy Sources, Reading Self-efficacy Beliefs, Reading Comprehension, Saudi EFL Learners


1983 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret G. McKeown ◽  
Isabel L. Beck ◽  
Richard C. Omanson ◽  
Charles A. Perfetti

A study that investigated the relationship between vocabulary instruction and reading comprehension was replicated and extended. The original study showed substantial gains in accuracy of word knowledge and speed of lexical access, but only marginal gains in comprehension. This latter result was attributable to methodological problems, and thus the comprehension measure was revised. In the present study, fourth graders were taught 104 words over a five-month period. Following instruction, these children and a group of uninstructed children matched on pre-instruction vocabulary and comprehension ability performed tasks to measure accuracy of word knowledge, speed of lexical access, and comprehension of stories containing taught words. Instructed children showed substantial advantage in all tasks. Reasons for these results, in contrast to studies that have failed to improve comprehension through vocabulary instruction, are discussed.


2016 ◽  
Vol 110 (6) ◽  
pp. 665-674 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuliya Ardasheva ◽  
Sarah N. Newcomer ◽  
Jonah B. Firestone ◽  
Richard L. Lamb

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document