scholarly journals Is Speech-Language Pathology’s Clinical Training Responsive to the South African Context?

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 52-70
Author(s):  
Skye Adams ◽  
Anniah Mupawose ◽  
Che Kelly ◽  
Sharon Moonsamy
Keyword(s):  
South African ◽  
Clinical Training ◽  
Power Dynamics ◽  
Community Settings ◽  
Speech Language Pathology ◽  
Clinical Educators ◽  
Language Pathology ◽  
African Context ◽  
Clinical Curriculum ◽  
Mind Set

The absence of equitable speech- language pathology services for South Africa’s black majority has triggered a need to decolonise the clinical curriculum. The purpose of this study was to describe the experiences of clinical educators when supervising diverse students in various community settings. A qualitative approach was employed, including interviewing seven clinical educators in speech-language pathology, in a focus group. The responses from the discussions were analysed using thematic content analysis. The participants highlighted themes and certain challenges (i) Differences (ii) discomfort (iii) clinical preparation and (iv) critical engagement. These results highlight a mismatch between the efforts of the department to transform and the experiences of the clinical educators. The results further highlight the need for the department to support clinical educators in developing a mind-set of change, of shifting the power dynamics and valuing intercultural communication.

Clinical Teaching Methods for Stimulating Students' Critical Thinking

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (11) ◽  
pp. 3-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samantha J. Procaccini ◽  
Nancy J. Carlino ◽  
Denise M. Joseph
Keyword(s):  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Teaching Methods ◽  
Clinical Teaching ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Thinking Skills ◽  
Critical Thinking Skills ◽  
Speech Language Pathology ◽  
Clinical Educators ◽  
Integral Role ◽  
Language Pathology

Critical thinking is a prerequisite to making any sound clinical decision. Many students entering into the fields of speech-language pathology and audiology are not equipped with the necessary critical thinking skills to formulate evidence-based clinical decisions. Clinical educators play an integral role in facilitating the development of students' critical thinking skills. Most clinical educators recognize the significance of, and implications for implementing teaching methods which foster critical thinking. However, many clinical educators demonstrate uncertainty about which methods to employ and how to implement such methods. This article will discuss the selection and implementation of effective teaching methods for developing students' critical thinking.

scholarly journals Conscious Clinical Education: The Evidence-Based Education—Clinical Education Model

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (04) ◽  
pp. 279-288
Author(s):  
Mark DeRuiter ◽  
Sarah M. Ginsberg
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Education ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Graduate Programs ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Speech Language Pathology ◽  
Clinical Educators ◽  
Language Pathology ◽  
Education Model

AbstractThe fields of speech-language pathology and audiology, collectively referred to as communication sciences and disorders, are driven by evidence-based practice (EBP). As accountability in clinical service delivery continues to increase, there are few who would argue that encouraging clinicians to engage in methods that have withstood the rigors of peer-review is the wrong approach. Graduate students are typically given many opportunities to learn about the evidence for their discipline, and graduate programs are required to provide these opportunities under accreditation standards. While EBP is critical to our discipline's clinical function, we assert that evidence-based education (EBE) is equally as important as EBP to our discipline's function in educating our students. This article discusses EBP and EBE with a focus on elements that may not have been considered in the past, particularly within the complex dynamic of the EBE and clinical education interface. We present current and proposed models, including a new model of EBE in clinical education. We share insights into how the new and proposed models fit within the broader context of clinical decision making and the scholarship of teaching and learning. We conclude by addressing future needs for the education of clinical educators.

Different Clinical Perspectives of Good and Poor Therapy Sessions

1987 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 335-342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanne Erwick Roberts ◽  
Vicki McCready
Keyword(s):  
Graduate Student ◽  
Clinical Training ◽  
Causal Attributions ◽  
Therapy Session ◽  
Speech Language Pathology ◽  
Training Process ◽  
Observer Bias ◽  
Language Pathology ◽  
Therapy Sessions

This study investigated differences in causal attributions made by student clinicians taking actor and observer roles in good and poor therapy Sessions. One hundred thirty-four graduate student clinicians in speech-language pathology were asked to imagine a hypothetical good or poor therapy session in which they took either the role of a clinician working with a client in a session or that of a clinician observing the session. To account for the session's hypothesized outcomes, clinicians taking the actor role cited client causes more frequently than other causes while clinicians taking the observer role cited clinician causes. These results are consistent with the actor-observer bias documented extensively in the psychological and educational literatures. Clinicians' causal attributions also differed for good and poor therapy sessions. Implications are discussed in terms of possible impact on the clinical training process in speech-language pathology.

Update on Academic and Clinical Training in Cleft Palate/Craniofacial Anomalies for Speech-Language Pathology Students

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 870-877 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brooke Mills ◽  
Mary Hardin-Jones
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Palate ◽  
Clinical Training ◽  
Academic Programs ◽  
Craniofacial Anomalies ◽  
Speech Language Pathology ◽  
Master's Programs ◽  
Legitimate Concern ◽  
Language Pathology ◽  
Elective Course ◽  
Survey Responses

Purpose The purpose of this study was to survey speech-language pathology master's programs regarding their academic and clinical coverage of cleft palate/craniofacial anomalies. Method A link to a 19-item survey was sent via e-mail to the program directors of 271 accredited graduate programs in speech-language pathology. Information was also obtained via university websites to verify survey responses. Results The response rate was 86% with 232 of 271 programs completing all or part of the survey. Twenty-four percent of respondents indicated their program offers a dedicated and required course in cleft palate/craniofacial anomalies, 22% offer an elective course, and 51% embed this content in other courses. Respondents reported that their students frequently (7%), sometimes (58%), or rarely (34%) receive clinical experience with this population. Conclusion Our findings suggest that an increasing number of academic programs are eliminating dedicated coursework in cleft palate/craniofacial anomalies and are embedding such content in other courses. A legitimate concern resulting from this consolidation of coursework is the degree to which feeding, articulation, and resonance difficulties associated with cleft palate/craniofacial anomalies are being addressed elsewhere in the curriculum.

Broadening the “Ports of Entry” for Speech-Language Pathologists: A Reflective Model of Supervision

2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 51-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elaine Geller
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Speech Language Pathology ◽  
Specific Training ◽  
Speech Language Pathologists ◽  
Clinical Educators ◽  
Core Concepts ◽  
Language Pathology ◽  
Traditional Approaches

The purpose of this article is to explore core concepts that are integral to developing a relationship-based and reflective model of supervision in speech-language pathology. Many of the concepts to be discussed emerged from the study of infancy and mental health. These fundamental constructs will be used to illustrate how clinical educators can expand their traditional approaches to supervision with the goal of embedding these constructs within discipline-specific training. Each construct will be briefly defined followed by how the construct can be applied to supervision. Two supervision scenarios will be examined as to how relationship-based and reflective principles were integrated into supervision.

Supervisory Practices in Speech - Language Pathology: Pre-practicum Assessment of Student Clinicians in Graduate Training Programs

2009 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 107-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel E. Phillips
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Research ◽  
Graduate Student ◽  
Training Programs ◽  
Graduate Training ◽  
Speech Language Pathology ◽  
Clinical Educators ◽  
Qualitative Research Methodology ◽  
Language Pathology ◽  
Graduate Training Programs ◽  
Supervisory Practices

Abstract How do supervisors determine the level of clinical independence of graduate student clinicians before clinic practicum begins and how do supervisors determine the style of supervision used with each student clinician? A qualitative research methodology was used to investigate supervisory practices of clinical educators supervising graduate student clinicians in speech-language pathology graduate training programs. Data was gathered through standardized open-ended interviews with 11 supervisors from five graduate training programs accredited by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA). All 11 supervisors conducted a pre-practicum assessment, but none used a published program or model to assess the student clinicians. All participants met with the student clinicians prior to the start of therapy to discuss the client. Analysis of data revealed three distinct types of meetings: presentation of the client by the clinician, presentation of the clinician to the supervisor, and pre-practicum assessment using a form. Eight of the 11 supervisors interviewed for this study determined the level of clinical independence of the student clinician solely by asking the clinician to present the client to the supervisor. The supervisors then evaluated the manner, organization, accuracy, and completeness of the presentation to estimate the student's level of clinical independence.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document