Clinical Teaching Methods for Stimulating Students' Critical Thinking

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (11) ◽  
pp. 3-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samantha J. Procaccini ◽  
Nancy J. Carlino ◽  
Denise M. Joseph

Critical thinking is a prerequisite to making any sound clinical decision. Many students entering into the fields of speech-language pathology and audiology are not equipped with the necessary critical thinking skills to formulate evidence-based clinical decisions. Clinical educators play an integral role in facilitating the development of students' critical thinking skills. Most clinical educators recognize the significance of, and implications for implementing teaching methods which foster critical thinking. However, many clinical educators demonstrate uncertainty about which methods to employ and how to implement such methods. This article will discuss the selection and implementation of effective teaching methods for developing students' critical thinking.

Author(s):  
Dana Battaglia

Critical thinking requires one to be abstract, continually raise questions, independently obtain and reviews evidence, and converge these experiences to offer open-minded solutions. These same traits are required for speech-language pathology students to become successful clinicians. This work describes a mixed method investigation of explicit and infused instruction of critical thinking skills in the context of one graduate-level course in a program accredited from the American Speech-Language Hearing Association. While quantitative findings only demonstrate significant positive change on select items using a Likert scale, qualitative data describe deep learning and growth in the areas of broad life-impact, expansion of knowledge, empathy and perspective taking, and evidence-based practice. Convergence of these data, and future directions are discussed.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (04) ◽  
pp. 279-288
Author(s):  
Mark DeRuiter ◽  
Sarah M. Ginsberg

AbstractThe fields of speech-language pathology and audiology, collectively referred to as communication sciences and disorders, are driven by evidence-based practice (EBP). As accountability in clinical service delivery continues to increase, there are few who would argue that encouraging clinicians to engage in methods that have withstood the rigors of peer-review is the wrong approach. Graduate students are typically given many opportunities to learn about the evidence for their discipline, and graduate programs are required to provide these opportunities under accreditation standards. While EBP is critical to our discipline's clinical function, we assert that evidence-based education (EBE) is equally as important as EBP to our discipline's function in educating our students. This article discusses EBP and EBE with a focus on elements that may not have been considered in the past, particularly within the complex dynamic of the EBE and clinical education interface. We present current and proposed models, including a new model of EBE in clinical education. We share insights into how the new and proposed models fit within the broader context of clinical decision making and the scholarship of teaching and learning. We conclude by addressing future needs for the education of clinical educators.


2011 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-35
Author(s):  
Gary J. Rentschler ◽  
Rachel M. Gasior

Peer mentoring has been shown to provide benefits in a variety of situations in several professions. To facilitate clinical learning in speech-language pathology, a clinical teaching paradigm utilizing student peer mentoring was constructed. The roles of the student mentor and the mentees are reported and the benefits of this paradigm are discussed. Student peer mentoring may be a useful tool in supporting marginal students in clinical learning.


2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 71
Author(s):  
Muhammad Andi Isya'

Over time, education experts have successfully created a new formula had appalling education. Bobby DePorter one education expert has created a new and practical way to affect the mental state of students conducted by the teacher. All were summarized in Quantum Teaching, which means the conversion of a variety of interactions that exist within the students into something beneficial for both the students themselves and for others. The purpose of this development study is: it produces the product of the teaching methods that are implemented Quantum Teaching Skills Approach process consisting of manual teaching methods Quantum Teaching. Products Quantum Teaching learning method has been refined based on the analysis of trial data. Based on the measures that have been implemented can be concluded as follows. 1). Products are revised based on test results of theoretical and empirical are: assessment experts do not indicate a revision, but the results of the questionnaire, the revision by the student based on the questionnaire: (1) Changing procedure of evaluation in the use of the model (2) Fix the model view or change strategy learning. 2.) The products developed interesting for classical learning in the classroom and independently. 3) The product of these products can ease the burden of teachers in teaching. 4) The results of expert validation and testing, Quantum Learning methods Teaching to develop critical thinking skills is fit for use for learning .5) products developed can increase students' motivation, and motivation is one of the conditions of implementation of productive learning model in the form method Quantum teaching learning to develop critical thinking skills.


2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 71
Author(s):  
Muhammad Andi Isya'

Over time, education experts have successfully created a new formula had appalling education. Bobby DePorter one education expert has created a new and practical way to affect the mental state of students conducted by the teacher. All were summarized in Quantum Teaching, which means the conversion of a variety of interactions that exist within the students into something beneficial for both the students themselves and for others. The purpose of this development study is: it produces the product of the teaching methods that are implemented Quantum Teaching Skills Approach process consisting of manual teaching methods Quantum Teaching. Products Quantum Teaching learning method has been refined based on the analysis of trial data. Based on the measures that have been implemented can be concluded as follows. 1). Products are revised based on test results of theoretical and empirical are: assessment experts do not indicate a revision, but the results of the questionnaire, the revision by the student based on the questionnaire: (1) Changing procedure of evaluation in the use of the model (2) Fix the model view or change strategy learning. 2.) The products developed interesting for classical learning in the classroom and independently. 3) The product of these products can ease the burden of teachers in teaching. 4) The results of expert validation and testing, Quantum Learning methods Teaching to develop critical thinking skills is fit for use for learning .5) products developed can increase students' motivation, and motivation is one of the conditions of implementation of productive learning model in the form method Quantum teaching learning to develop critical thinking skills.


Curationis ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
U. Kyriacos

Conference paper. Address delivered at the Nursing Education Association Conference on Clinical Teaching: Broederstroom - March 1992


2020 ◽  
Vol 61 (2) ◽  
pp. 309-320
Author(s):  
Takashi NAKAYAMA ◽  
Kento MOMOHARA ◽  
Hiroyoshi KINOSHITA

Author(s):  
Samantha Dalessio ◽  
Nancy Carlino ◽  
Mary Barnum

Purpose The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of the supervision-questioning-feedback (SQF) model of supervision on critical thinking in graduate students studying speech-language pathology. The researchers hypothesized that students who were provided with the SQF model of supervision would score higher than students who received the non-SQF (NSQF) style of supervision on the selected critical thinking measures. Method Seventeen out of 24 first semester graduate students in speech-language pathology completing their on-site university-based clinical practicum experience consented to participate in the study. Of the 17 participating first semester students, 9 were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 SQF trained supervisors, and the other 8 were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 NSQF trained supervisors for the duration of 1 semester. Additionally, 3 out of 24 fourth semester graduate students completing their off-site externship experience and their supervisors consented to participate in the study. Four additional study participants served as independent SQF-trained raters charged with the task of analyzing video recorded student-supervisor conferences to determine whether the SQF model of supervision was being implemented. Prior to and at the conclusion of the clinical experience, all participating students completed two measures of critical thinking: (1) California Critical Thinking Skills Test (CCTST) and (2) two Simucase® clinical simulations. At the conclusion of the clinical experience, seventeen out of 20 participating students (11/12 SQF students and 6/8 NSQF students) completed a post-survey rating their supervisory experience . Results For participating first semester students, there were no overall statistically significant differences between SQF and NSQF groups as measured by pre to post completion of (1) CCTST (p=.544) and (2) two Simucase® clinical simulations (p=.781). The 3 participating fourth semester students who received the SQF model of supervision also showed no statistically significant differences on pre to post completion of the (1) CCTST (p=.827) and (2) two Simucase® virtual cases (p=.879). Results from SQF ratings revealed variability in the implementation of the SQF model across supervisors with a moderate level of inter-rater agreement. Results from post surveys completed by students showed that students preferred the SQF model of supervision over the NSQF model (p=.044). Conclusion Results from this preliminary study indicated that the SQF model did not influence the overall outcomes on the selected critical thinking measures. Student preference for the SQF model may support existing evidence that learning clinicians want to be actively engaged in the supervisory process. There were several limitations to this study including the small sample size, variability in the implementation of the SQF model across supervisors, sensitivity of the selected critical thinking measures, and timing of post-intervention procedures. Further investigation of the effects of SQF on students’ critical thinking is warranted.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document