scholarly journals Co-pretreatment of Municipal Wastewater and Landfill Leachate by Chemical Coagulation Using Ferric Chloride and Aluminum Sulfate

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-1
Author(s):  
Müslün Sara TUNÇ
Keyword(s):  
Ferric Chloride ◽  
Landfill Leachate ◽  
Aluminum Sulfate ◽  
Municipal Wastewater ◽  
Chemical Coagulation

scholarly journals Comparison of ferric chloride and aluminum sulfate on phosphorus removal and membrane fouling in MBR treating BAF effluent of municipal wastewater

2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 442-448 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xin Li ◽  
Yali Liu ◽  
Fangfang Liu ◽  
Aimin Liu ◽  
Qilan Feng
Keyword(s):  
Ferric Chloride ◽  
Membrane Fouling ◽  
Phosphorus Removal ◽  
Aluminum Sulfate ◽  
Municipal Wastewater ◽  
Transmembrane Pressure ◽  
Particle Sizes ◽  
Fouling Control ◽  
Aerated Filter ◽  
Sludge Particle

A membrane bioreactor (MBR) was used for treating biological aerated filter effluent in a municipal wastewater plant, and chemical phosphorus removal was accomplished in the MBR. The results showed that ferric chloride of 20 mg/L and aluminum sulfate of 30 mg/L were the optimal dosages for total phosphorus (TP) removal, and the TP removal efficiency was over 80%. In long-term continuous operations, both ferric chloride and aluminum sulfate effectively mitigated membrane fouling, with the corresponding growth rate of transmembrane pressure decreased to 0.08 and 0.067 kPa/d, respectively. Sludge particle sizes analysis demonstrated that the decrease of particle sizes lower than 50 μm was the main reason for membrane fouling control. Simultaneously, the proteins and polysaccharide (PS) concentrations in the MBR supernatant were analyzed, and the PS concentration significantly decreased to 2.02 mg/L at aluminum sulfate of 30 mg/L, indicating the flocculation of aluminum sulfate on PS was the main reason for mitigation of membrane fouling.

Challenges of arsenic removal from municipal wastewater by coagulation with ferric chloride and alum

2020 ◽  
Vol 725 ◽  
pp. 138351 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jie Ge ◽  
Biswarup Guha ◽  
Lee Lippincott ◽  
Stanley Cach ◽  
Jinshan Wei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ferric Chloride ◽  
Municipal Wastewater ◽  
Arsenic Removal

Treatment of a complex landfill leachate with peat

1978 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-97 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert D. Cameron
Keyword(s):  
Chemical Oxygen Demand ◽  
Ferric Chloride ◽  
Landfill Leachate ◽  
Metal Removal ◽  
Oxygen Demand ◽  
Treatment Method ◽  
Manganese Concentration ◽  
Chemical Pretreatment ◽  
Iron Manganese

The use of cheap, locally available peat as a treatment method for landfill leachate was investigated by passing leachate through plexiglass columns filled with an amorphous-granular peat. Preliminary adjustment of pH showed that reducing pH to 4.8 dramatically reduced adsorption. Increasing the pH to 8.4, metal removal was increased owing to filtration of precipitated metals. The best adsorption of metals occurred at the 'natural' pH of 7.1. Manganese was found to be the limiting pollutant. At the 0.05 mg/ℓ maximum acceptable manganese concentration 94% of the total metals were removed, requiring 159 kg of peat per 1000 ℓ of leachate.Resting the peat for 1 month did significantly increase removal capacity.Desorption of some contaminants occurred when water was percolated through the peat. The desorption test effluent was not toxic to fish although iron, lead and COD (chemical oxygen demand) exceeded acceptable values.Chemical pretreatment using lime and ferric chloride achieved significant iron, manganese and calcium removals. Chemical pretreatment followed by peat adsorption offered no advantage other than reducing toxicity to fish.Peat treatment alone was effective in reducing concentrations to a level that was non-toxic to fish.

Pre-Ozonation-Coagulant Interactions in Direct Filtration

2010 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 317-326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Murat Eyvaz ◽  
Hatice Deniz ◽  
Tuğrul S. Aktaş ◽  
Ebubekir Yüksel ◽  
Ahmet M. Saatçi
Keyword(s):  
Ferric Chloride ◽  
Aluminum Sulfate ◽  
Pilot Scale ◽  
The Other ◽  
Design Parameters ◽  
Dimensionless Number ◽  
Raw Water ◽  
Direct Filtration ◽  
Effluent Quality ◽  
Sulfate Application

Abstract Pre-ozonation–coagulant interactions effects in relation to the coagulant type and dosage in direct filtration of surface waters were investigated. The performance of the process was evaluated by monitoring the effluent quality and head loss development through the filter bed. Two identical pilot scale filter columns filtering the same raw water were operated in parallel. The raw water was brought from Ömerli Reservoir in Istanbul. Before filtering, the raw water flow was split into two equal flows. One of the streams was pre-ozonated and the other was aerated using contact chambers with equal volumes equipped with same number and type of diffusers. In coagulation experiments, one of the filters was operated using aluminum sulfate as a coagulant while the other one was run with ferric chloride. For similar filter run times, the effluent quality was always better with pre-ozonation compared to aeration. It was also observed that, aluminum sulfate application gave more favorable results for both particle and turbidity removal compared to ferric chloride. Ives’ filterability index which incorporates the important filtration design parameters such as: effluent quality, the headloss and the velocity of filtration into a dimensionless number was used for the comparison of the experimental results.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document