scholarly journals THE CONSUMER DECISION OF CHANGES PURCHASING GLASSES IN OPTICAL NAOMY YEAR 2019

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wahjoe Handini Dina ◽  
Ita Puji Lestari
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Decision Process ◽  
Cost Benefit Analysis ◽  
Cost Benefit ◽  
Purchase Decision ◽  
Decision Making Process ◽  
Benefit Analysis ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Descriptive Research ◽  
Optical Glasses

The purchase decision process is the process through which consumers when buying a product. It can be seen as a special form of cost-benefit analysis. This study is about knowing the decision of consumers in the purchase of glasses in the form of design, price, services, promotions and materials. The type of research is descriptive research conducted with the main objective to create a picture or a description of a situation objectively with the approach used in the study is Cross-sectional namely researchers put through observation or measurement variables at one time. Research in Optics Naomy shows that in the period July - September 2019 there were 32 respondents consisting of 19 (59.4%) of female respondents and 13 (40.6%) male respondents - men. Most aged 15-25 years as many as 26 people (81.3%), not married as many as 26 people (81.3%), student / student as many as 23 people (71.9%) and earn less than Rp 1 million, 00 as many as 26 people (81.3%). The majority of respondents in the optical Naomy declare eyeweare design is Good (62,5%), the price of the glasses in the optical Naomy is Less Suitable (65,6%), services in the optical Naomy is Good (65,6%), promotion in the optical Naomy is Good (62,5%), materials in optical glasses Naomy Good (56,2%). The decision making process of consumers in the purchase of glasses in the optical Weleri in this study prefer the design (22%) and services (21.8%), materials (21.2%), price (19.8%) and promotions (15.2 %). 

scholarly journals A NEW SIMPLIFIED DECISION MAKING SYSTEM FOR SMALL PROJECTS

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 480-485 ◽  
Author(s):  
Secărea Tudorel
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Cost Benefit Analysis ◽  
Cost Benefit ◽  
Decision Making Process ◽  
Benefit Analysis ◽  
Limited Budget ◽  
Decision Making System ◽  
The Cost ◽  
High Degree ◽  
Bare Minimum

Making decisions on funding or not funding projects is the most difficult process in management, especially for the state services that have a limited budget. The aim of this study is to establish a new simplified system for evaluating small projects based on translating all values into economic terms. The new system tries to simplify the Cost-Benefit Analysis (on which it is based) to the bare minimum and still keep a high degree of relevance to the decision-making process. The conclusions were somewhat remarkable, mostly because the system gives accurate and relevant data for comparing projects despite its simplicity. The other big benefit of this system is its simple nature and ease of understanding even for people with no economic studies.The applied part of this paper involves an analysis of real projects in Brasov County – Romania and the results of applying Cost-Benefit Analysis and the new method for evaluating projects.The paper concludes proposing a new, modern and simple system for improving decision making on small projects.

The gentle tyranny of cost–benefit analysis in transport appraisal

2019 ◽  
pp. 131-152
Author(s):  
Robin Hickman
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Planning Process ◽  
Cost Benefit Analysis ◽  
Cost Benefit ◽  
Decision Making Process ◽  
Benefit Analysis ◽  
Transport Planning ◽  
The Uk ◽  
Economic Criteria

This chapter considers the application of cost-benefit analysis in the UK transport planning process, asking whether a reliance on narrow economic criteria, and a centralised decision-making process, helps us to progress sufficiently against wide-ranging sustainability goals. A case study of the proposed Merseytram is examined, a project that remains unimplemented from the early 2000s.

Risk Analysis within Feasibility Studies: An Application to Cost-Benefit Analysis for the Construction of a New Road

2014 ◽  
Vol 651-653 ◽  
pp. 1249-1254 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincenzo del Giudice ◽  
Alfredo Passeri ◽  
Francesca Torrieri ◽  
Pierfrancesco de Paola
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Risk Analysis ◽  
Cost Benefit Analysis ◽  
Cost Benefit ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Decision Making Process ◽  
Interval Estimate ◽  
Benefit Analysis ◽  
Investment Appraisal ◽  
Multiple Variables

The present paper aims at testing new techniques of Quantitative Risk Analysis (QRA), based on a Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS), to Cost-Benefit evaluation of transportation projects. Cost-Benefit analysis have been widely used for the evaluation of projects, especially in the phase of "feasibility study" in order to support decision makers in the choice between design alternatives compared to financial and socio economic performance indicators.However, the empirical experience has shown that investment appraisal can be affected by many elements of risk, due to system’s uncertainty and the multiplicity of interests involved [1,2] especially in a field such as the construction of a new road that will affect a community [3].Actually, the input and output variables of the model, can not always be determined with certainty by the analyst, but are influenced by elements of uncertainty due to numerous biases that "normally" connote a decision-making process in which multiple variables contribute to the formulation of the choice.QRA and MCS aims at quantify the uncertainty embedded in the appraisal model through a probabilistic approach, effectively accounts for every possible value that each variable within the model can take by use of various Probability Distribution Function (PDF). The resulting point estimate is then transformed into an interval estimate illustrated in terms of PDF.The proposed approach will be tested on an interesting case study regarding the economic evaluation of a new connection road in the Latium region of Italy. The results obtained shown that QRA and MCS can helps decision makers in taking more transparent and responsible behaviors in the decision making process.

scholarly journals A Methodological Framework for Sustainable Office Building Renovation Using Green Building Rating Systems and Cost-Benefit Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (15) ◽  
pp. 6156
Author(s):  
Nataša Šuman ◽  
Mojca Marinič ◽  
Milan Kuhta
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Sustainable Development ◽  
Cost Benefit Analysis ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Cost Benefit ◽  
Green Building ◽  
Office Buildings ◽  
Office Building ◽  
Rating System ◽  
Benefit Analysis

Sustainable development is a priority for the future of our society. Sustainable development is of particular importance to the Architecture, Engineering, and Construction (AEC) industry, both for new buildings and for the renovation of existing buildings. Great potential for sustainable development lies in the renovation of existing office buildings. This paper introduces a new framework for identifying the best set of renovation strategies for existing office buildings. The framework applies selected green building rating system criteria and cost-effective sustainable renovation solutions based on cost-benefit analysis (CBA), and thus provides a novelty in decision-making support for the sustainable renovation of office buildings at an early-stage. The framework covers all necessary steps and activities including data collection, determination of the required level of renovation, selection of the green building rating system, identification of impact categories and criteria, and final evaluation and decision-making using CBA. The framework can be used in conjunction with different systems and according to different regional characteristics. The applicability of the addressing procedure is shown through a case study of a comprehensive renovation of an office building in the city of Maribor.

STAKEHOLDERS, SPATIAL LOCATIONS AND TIME HORIZONS IN AN EXTENDED SOCIAL COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS: A CASE OF PIPALPANKHA WATER RESOURCE PROJECT

2009 ◽  
Vol 11 (02) ◽  
pp. 245-265 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. RAM BABU ◽  
NALLATHIGA RAMAKRISHNA
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Water Resource ◽  
Social Cost ◽  
Cost Benefit Analysis ◽  
Cost Benefit ◽  
Development Project ◽  
Development Projects ◽  
Benefit Analysis ◽  
Time Horizons ◽  
Spatial Locations

Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) has been serving as an important tool for decision making with regard to the development projects involving large investments. The Social Cost-Benefit Analysis (SCBA) is an extension of the CBA to certain social impacts, which hitherto were not measured. As the impacts of development projects on ecology and environment assumed importance, measuring the corresponding costs and benefits also began to assume significance. With the advancement in economic valuation techniques over time, measurement could be done and the framework of SCBA has been extended to incorporate the same. Moreover, unlike the CBAs, which do not account for the distributional aspects, the SCBA can potentially account for these. This paper presents a case study of extending the SCBA framework to include social and environmental impacts of a large water resource development project in India. It emphasises the distribution of project benefits and costs over stakeholders, spatial locations and time horizons so as to demonstrate the utility of extended SCBA in project decision making. It is observed that both the numeraire measure i.e. cost-benefit ratio, as well as the distributional analysis present a favourable case for the project.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document