scholarly journals Sequential applied Benzalkonium Chloride and Insulin Eye Drops Reduces Ocular Central Macular Thickness and Improves vision of Diabetics and Non-Diabetics

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Herman C.I. Themen ◽  
Jerry R. Toelsie ◽  
Jerrel C. Pawiroredjo ◽  
Dinesh Jiawan ◽  
Robbert Bipat
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Benzalkonium Chloride ◽  
Macular Thickness ◽  
Eye Drops ◽  
Pathophysiological Mechanism ◽  
Central Macular Thickness ◽  
Efficient Treatment ◽  
Inflammatory Processes ◽  
The Mean

Introduction  Macular Edema is a rather disabling condition that can be the consequence of several disorders of the eye. Most of the time it occurs in patients suffering from diabetic eye retinopathy. The exact pathophysiological mechanism of this condition is not clear, but it is probably the result of inflammatory processes or structural and mechanical disturbances of the vitreomacular tissue. Due to this obscure pathophysiological mechanism, a targeted efficient treatment is still lacking. However, accumulating evidence is suggesting that local application of insulin might reduce the structural and functional defects of this disorder. The aim of this study is to assess the effects of sequential applied benzalkonium chloride and Insulin eye drops on the visual acuity and central macular thickness of eyes suffering from macular edema. Methods Patients refractive to or refusing treatment with anti-VEGF agents were selected. Their visual acuity and central macular thickness were measured immediately before and until six months after treatment. The treatment consisted of twice a day application of specially prepared benzalkonium chloride and Insulin eye drops. Results are expressed as mean ± SD. The procedures followed were all in line with the guides for ethics of the hospital and were not in conflict with the declaration of Helsinki. Result After six months, the mean visual acuity increased significantly from 0.28±0.17 to 0.53±0.27 (p = 0.001) and the central macular thickness decreased from 393±122 µm to 250±72 µm (p = 0.0001). Conclusion Sequential applied benzalkonium chloride and insulin eye drops improve visual acuity and reduce central macular thickness in eyes suffering from macular edema. Further studies to elucidate the exact mechanism of action are necessary. Apart from this, the use of these drops may prove to be a cheaper and more efficient method to treat the rather disabling condition.

scholarly journals Real-Life Management of Patients with Retinal Vein Occlusion Using I-Macula Web Platform

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Massimo Nicolò ◽  
Monica Bonetto ◽  
Raffaella Rosa ◽  
Donatella Musetti ◽  
Maria Musolino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Retinal Vein Occlusion ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Macular Thickness ◽  
Central Macular Thickness ◽  
Vein Occlusion ◽  
Corrected Visual Acuity ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Web Platform

Aim.Real-lifeevaluation in the management of patients affected by macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion.Material and Methods. A retrospective, observational study using theI-Macula Webplatform.Results. Thirty-five patients (37 eyes; 15 females and 20 male) affected by RVO were analysed. At 12 months, there was a statistically significant improvement of best-corrected visual acuity (p=0.0235) and central macular thickness (p<0.0001). The mean change in visual acuity was 8.9 letters. Twenty-seven eyes underwent DEX implant (n=62; mean: 2.29) only. Of these, 8, 4, 14, and 1 eyes underwent 1, 2, 3, and 4 DEX implants, respectively. The remaining 10 eyes were also injected with ranibizumab (n=49; mean: 4.9). At 12 months, 12 eyes (32.5%) presented a dry macula, whereas the remaining 25 eyes (67.5%) still had macular edema. Mean interval between the first and second treatment (T1) and between the second and third treatment (T2) were 5.15 and (T2) 3.7 months, respectively. Where only DEX implants were received, T1 and T2 was 5.1 and 4.9 months, respectively.Conclusions. This study confirms that DEX implants and/or anti-VEGF drugs improve visual acuity and central macular thickness in patients affected by RVO.

scholarly journals Outcomes of Intravitreal Bevacizumab in Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema at a Tertiary Hospital in Northern Tanzania

2020 ◽  
pp. 27-34
Author(s):  
Shariza Kanji ◽  
Kazim Dhalla ◽  
William Makupa
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Intravitreal Bevacizumab ◽  
Macular Thickness ◽  
Central Macular Thickness ◽  
Central Vision ◽  
Macular Volume ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Anatomical Outcomes

Background: Diabetic macular edema is a type of diabetic maculopathy affecting the central vision, ranging from mild blur to blindness. Laser photocoagulation has been the mainstay of treatment for the past three decades but it has a limited role in improving the central vision. Recent introduction of anti-vascular endothelial growth factors appears to be promising in restoring vision. However, due to its short half life multiple injections are required to control edema and maintain vision. Objectives: To determine the visual and anatomical outcomes of intravitreal bevacizumab in patients with diabetic macular edema. Methods: A hospital based retrospective cross-sectional study was done at Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Center eye department from 2011- 2015. During this time, patients with  diabetic macular edema who were given intravitreal bevacizumab and satisfied the inclusion criteria were included in the study. Visual acuity, central macular thickness and macular volume were recorded at baseline, six, twelve, eighteen, twenty four and thirty weeks respectively. Optical coherence tomography was used to record central macular thickness and macular volume. Univariate and multivariate binary regression analysis were done and the p-value, odds ratio and 95% confidence interval were calculated. Results: The prevalence of Diabetic macular edema was 15.4%. Mean baseline visual acuity improved from  0.9 ± 0.57 log MAR (6/48) to 0.6±0.49 log MAR (6/24) (95% CI 0.207 - 0.389) at 30 weeks. The mean baseline central macular thickness decreased from 426.97 ± 148.358 μm to 280.98 ± 95.89  μm at 30 weeks (95% 151.531 - 187.044, P < .001). The mean baseline macular volume decreased significantly from 10.59 ± 2.55 mm3 to 8.38 ± 1.498 mm3 (95% CI 1.860 - 2.886) at 30 weeks. In multivariate analysis, patients with no hypertension were more likely to have a better visual outcome of 6/18 or better (95% CI 1.064 - 4.420, P < .033). Conclusion: This study shows a high burden of diabetic macular edema in our setting. Intravitreal bevacizumab injection results in better visual and anatomical outcomes.

scholarly journals Intravitreal Avastin as a Treatment of Diffuse Diabetic Macular Edema

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Expression System ◽  
Chinese Hamster ◽  
Macular Thickness ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Central Macular Thickness ◽  
Diffuse Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
The Mean

Background: Macular edema, defined as retinal thickening within 2 disc diameters of the center of the macula, results from retinal microvascular changes that compromise the blood-retinal barrier, causing leakage of plasma constituents into the surrounding retina and, consequently, retinal edema. Focal edema is associated with hard exudate rings caused by leakage from micro aneurysms. Diffuse edema is caused by leakage from micro aneurysms, retinal capillaries, and arterioles. Avastin (Bevacizumab) is a recombinant humanized monoclonal IgG1 antibody that binds to and inhibits the biologic activity of human vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). It contains human framework regions and the complementaritydetermining regions of a murine antibody that binds to VEGF. Avastin produced in a Chinese Hamster Ovary mammalian cell expression system in a nutrient medium containing the antibiotic gentamicin and has a molecular weight of approximately 149 kilo Daltons. Purpose: To assess the anatomic effect and visual acuity response after intravitreal (Avastin) in patients with diffuse diabetic macular edema. Patients and Methods: This study included 15 eyes of15 Patients with stable diabetes mellitus with diffuse diabetic macular edema. All eyes had received some form of argon laser photocoagulation (pan retinal photocoagulation (PRP), Focal or Grid of duration not less than 6 months. Mean age of 59 years treated with two intravitreal injections of Avastin 1.25 mg in 0.05 ml six weeks apart. Patients were examined by experienced ophthalmologist visual acuity, evaluation of diabetic retinopathy, central macular thickness by optical coherence tomography each was evaluated at the begging of study (baseline) and follow-up visits. Results: 15 eyes of 15 diabetic patients with persistent diffuse macular edema with no improvement in visual acuity. All the patients received two injections of A vastin six weeks apart. No complications were observed in any patient. The mean baseline visual acuity was (log Mar=1.338±0.455) and the mean visual acuity at three months following the second intravitreal injection was (log Mar=1.094±0.254), the mean central macular thickness at baseline was 492 µm decreased to 369 µm at the end of three months. Conclusions: A vastin resulted in a significant decrease in macular thickness and improvement in visual acuity at three months after the second injection.

Change in Visual Acuity in Relation to Central Macular Thickness after Intravitreal Bevacizumab in Diabetic Macular Edema

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Ali Haider ◽  
Uzma Sattar ◽  
Syeda Rushda Zaidi
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Intravitreal Bevacizumab ◽  
Macular Thickness ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
P Value ◽  
Central Macular Thickness ◽  
Anti Vegf ◽  
Quasi Experimental

Purpose: To evaluate the change in visual acuity in relation to decrease in central macular thickness,after a single dose of intravitreal Bevacizumab injection.Study Design: Quasi experimental study.Place and Duration of Study: Punjab Rangers Teaching Hospital, Lahore, from January 2019 to June 2019.Material and Methods: 70 eyes with diabetic macular edema were included in the study. Patients having high refractive errors (spherical equivalent of > ± 7.5D) and visual acuity worse than +1.2 or better than +0.2 on log MAR were excluded. Central macular edema was measured in μm on OCT and visual acuity was documentedusing Log MAR chart. These values were documented before and at 01 month after injection with intravitrealBevacizumab. Wilcoxon Signed rank test was used to evaluate the difference in VA beforeand after the anti-VEGF injection. Difference in visual acuity and macular edema (central) was observed,analyzed and represented in p value. P value was considered statistically significant if it was less than 0.01%.Results: Mean age of patients was 52.61 ± 1.3. Vision improved from 0.90 ± 0.02 to 0.84 ± 0.02 on log MARchart. The change was statistically significant with p value < 0.001. Central macular thickness reduced from 328 ±14 to 283 ± 10.6 μm on OCT after intravitreal anti-VEGF, with significant p value < 0.001.Conclusion: A 45 μm reduction in central macular thickness was associated with 0.1 Log MAR unit improvementin visual acuity after intravitreal Bevacizumab in diabetic macular edema.

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Intravitreal Ranibizumab for Diabetic Macular Edema in Vitrectomized and Nonvitrectomized Eyes

2016 ◽  
Vol 236 (2) ◽  
pp. 67-73 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshito Koyanagi ◽  
Shigeo Yoshida ◽  
Yoshiyuki Kobayashi ◽  
Yuki Kubo ◽  
Muneo Yamaguchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Treatment Option ◽  
Central Macular Thickness ◽  
Intravitreal Ranibizumab ◽  
Corrected Visual Acuity ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Best Corrected Visual Acuity

Purpose: To compare the effectiveness of intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) for diabetic macular edema (DME) between eyes with and without previous vitrectomy. Procedures: We prospectively assessed the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) after IVR for 6 months. Results: There were no significant differences in the baseline BCVA and CMT between both groups. In the nonvitrectomized group (n = 15), the mean changes of BCVA and CMT from baseline to month 6 were significant (p < 0.01). In the vitrectomized group (n = 10), the improvement appeared to be slower, and the mean BCVA improvement was not significant (p = 0.5), although the mean CMT decrease was significant (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the mean changes of BCVA and CMT between both groups at 6 months. Conclusions: The difference in the effectiveness of IVR between both groups was not significant. IVR can be a treatment option even for vitrectomized DME eyes.

scholarly journals Aflibercept or ranibizumab for the treatment of diabetic macular edema; a retrospective study

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 3000-3005
Author(s):  
Khlood M. Aldossary ◽  
Anfal Alruzuq ◽  
Ghady Almohanna ◽  
Hessa Almusallam ◽  
Sara Alamri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Macular Thickness ◽  
P Value ◽  
Central Macular Thickness ◽  
Intravitreal Ranibizumab ◽  
Injectable Drugs ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Intravitreal Aflibercept

Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a significant cause of diabetic retinopathy and a major cause of vision loss. In this study, we aimed to evaluate and compare the efficacy of two injectable drugs; intravitreal Aflibercept and intravitreal Ranibizumab for the treatment of DME of the eyes. A retrospective chart review was conducted for patients diagnosed with DME from March 2014 to January 2019 who received either intravitreal Aflibercept or intravitreal Ranibizumab injection. A total of 57 eyes were included, of which 19 eyes were treated with intravitreal Ranibizumab injection, and 38 eyes were treated with intravitreal Aflibercept injection; all eyes were examined for 3 months. Two outcomes were assessed in this study, namely; visual acuity (VA) and central macular thickness (CMT). The mean age in the Ranibizumab group was 61.1±9.5 vs 64.3±10.2 in the Aflibercept group with no significant difference (p-value=0.25). The ratio of improvement in visual acuity (VA) in the Ranibizumab group was 68.4% vs 44.7% in the Aflibercept group; (p-value=0.038) which demonstrates the superiority of Ranibizumab over Aflibercept concerning visual acuity result. However, there is no statistically significant difference between the ratio of improvement in central macular thickness (CMT) results in both groups; (p-value=1.00). In fact, the ratio of improvement in CMT in both groups was the same 78.9% for both the groups. The pre and post results demonstrated improvement in post-procedural for CMT among both the groups but only Ranibizumab group showed VA improvement post-procedural. Through this study, we concluded that both injectable drugs improve visual acuity (VA) and decrease central macular thickness (CMT) in eyes with DME. However, Ranibizumab is superior in improving visual acuity compared to Aflibercept. Further comparative effectiveness trials between Aflibercept and Ranibizumab are still warranted.

Correlation of visual acuity and central macular thickness in diabetic macular edema

2015 ◽  
Vol 93 ◽  
pp. n/a-n/a ◽  
Author(s):  
A. El Matri Hassairi ◽  
A. Chebil ◽  
M. Ben Abdallah ◽  
R. Maamouri ◽  
N. Chaker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Macular Thickness ◽  
Central Macular Thickness

scholarly journals CHOROIDAL THICKNESS IN PATIENTS WITH DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA

2021 ◽  
Vol 71 (2) ◽  
pp. 433-37
Author(s):  
Amash Aqil ◽  
Muhammad Moin ◽  
Khadijah Abid ◽  
Ahsan Mehmood
Keyword(s):  
Diabetic Retinopathy ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Choroidal Thickness ◽  
Macular Thickness ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Central Macular Thickness ◽  
Department Of Ophthalmology ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean

Objective: To evaluate central macular thickness and choroidal thickness in patients with macular edema due to diabetic retinopathy versus controls. Study Design: Cross-sectional comparative study. Place and Duration of Study: Department of Ophthalmology, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore, from Jan to Jul 2018. Methodology: A retrospective data of 100 eyes from 50 patients having with diabetic macular edema associated with diabetic retinopathy was extracted from hospital registry. Additionally, 100 eyes of 50 individuals without any preexisting ocular conditions, comprising a control group was included in the study. Choroidal thickness measurements were made from the posterior edge of the retinal pigment epithelium to the choroid/sclera junction at subfoveal level using optical coherence tomography. Central macular thickness was also measured for all the enrolled patients. Results: One hundred patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria were enrolled in our study. The mean age was 56.27 ± 14.41 years. The mean Central macular thickness of all the patients were reported as 270.49 ± 72.38 μm, while the choroidal thickness was 284.89 ± 96.51 μm. There was statistically significant difference in central macular thickness between both healthy and diabetic retinopathy with diabetic macular edema groups (p=0.001), whereas insignificant difference existed between the two groups forchoroidal thickness (p=0.735). Conclusion: In patients with diabetic macular edema no significant change in choroidal thickness was observed compared with healthy controls, while the thickness of the retina was high in patients with macular edema due to diabetes.

scholarly journals Dexamethasone intravitreal implant for macular edema: a pilot study in a public health center

2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (Suppl.3) ◽  
pp. e020104
Author(s):  
Maria Júlia Izzo Crespo ◽  
Cristina Nery Carbajo ◽  
Glaucia Luciano da Veiga ◽  
Fernando Luiz Affonso Fonseca ◽  
Vagner Loduca Lima ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Intraocular Pressure ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Vision Loss ◽  
Therapeutic Option ◽  
Macular Thickness ◽  
Central Macular Thickness ◽  
Cross Sectional

Introduction: Macula edema consists in one of the most common causes of visual impairment. Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of continuous release of 0.7 mg dexamethasone (using implantable device) for treatment of macular edema. Methods: Cross-sectional observational study of 16 patients treated with 0.7 mg dexamethasone intraocular implant. Visual acuity, intraocular pressure and central macular thickness were recorded at baseline, 1-month and 3-month follow-up. Results: 15 eyes of 13 patients were included. Most eyes (n=9) improve visual acuity from baseline at 1-month follow-up; this improvement persisted through 3-monyh follow-up in six eyes. The central macular thickness decreased in the majority of the subjects at 1-month (n=12) and at 3-month (n=10) follow-up. Three eyes presented with elevated intraocular pressure. Conclusion: Dexamethasone implant can both reduce the risk of vision loss and improve anatomical features of macular edema due to several pathologies studied. This implant may be used safely and should be considered a therapeutic option to Brazilian Public Health System.

scholarly journals The Difference Of Visual Acuity And Macular Thickness Post Bevacizumab Therapy In Secondary Macular Edema Retinal Vein Occlusion

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 110
Author(s):  
Citra Rahmadani ◽  
Nur Khoma Fatmawati ◽  
Rahmat Bakhtiar
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Retinal Vein Occlusion ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Macular Thickness ◽  
Vein Occlusion ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Difference

Retinal vein occlusion is the second most common cause of blindness in retinal vascular disease after diabetic retinopathy and may lead to complications of macular edema. Bevacizumab is an influential treatment as an anti vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). This study aims to determine the difference of visual acuity and macular thickness before and after treatment of Bevacizumab. This is a quasi experimental study in patients with secondary macular edema retinal vein occlusion who meets the inclusion criteria. Visual acuity and macular thickness were evaluated after one month of treatment. This study was conducted for two months since May-June 2017 by collecting secondary data from medical record at SMEC Samarinda from January 2016 – June 2017. Data were analyzed using Wilcoxon. Sixteen eyes from 16 patients were diagnosed with macular edema secondary retinal vein occlusion given bevacizumab treatment. The mean visual acuity before therapy was 1.106 LogMAR ± 0.509 and increased to 0.889 logMAR ± 0.608 (p = 0.116) after treatment while the mean macular thickness before therapy was 504.06 μm ± 301.273 and decreased to 348.81 μm ± 181.17 (p = 0.017) after treatment. There was a significant effect on the decrease in macular thickness but no significant effect on visual acuity improvement in patients with macular edema secondary retinal vein occlusion at SMEC Samarinda.  Keywords: Retinal vein occlusion, macular edema, bevacizumab

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document