An Analysis on the Social Studies Curriculum through Beutelsbach Consensus for Democratic Citizenship Education

2018 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 153-179
Author(s):  
Kyujoo Seol
2021 ◽  
Vol volume 05 (issue 2) ◽  
pp. 25-35
Author(s):  
Muhammad Kamran ◽  
Dr. Abida Nasreen

Abstract The importance of democratic citizenship education in democratic states is beyond dispute. The general purpose of the study is to describe democratic citizenship education and its practices in social studies’ classrooms at elementary school level. The study is qualitative in nature and descriptive phenomenological research design is used for this study. The accessible population of the study is included all the social studies’ teachers of 83 boys’ public sector elementary schools in district Lahore. Purposive sampling is used for the selection of the sample in this study. The sample of the study is included 20 social studies’ teachers of 10 boys’ public sector elementary schools of district Lahore. Two social studies’ teachers, one from primary section (grade 1- 5) and one from elementary section (grade 6- 8) who are teaching social studies’ subjects are selected from 10 boys public sector elementary schools of district Lahore by using purposive sampling technique. Participant observation is adopted as a tool to observe classrooms of social studies teachers through a checklist of objectives. Data is analyzed by using SPSS (statistical package of social sciences) software. On the basis of results it is concluded that majority of the social studies’ teachers are emerging their competencies and need improvement regarding the development of democratic citizenship education at public sector elementary school level.


Author(s):  
Simon Eten Angyagre ◽  
Albert Kojo Quainoo

A review of school curricula approaches to citizenship formation in a sub-Saharan African education context reveals such practice is still largely focused on a traditional social studies approach. This approach to citizenship development may be limiting in terms of potential to foster students' civic competencies for addressing social injustice associated with the impacts of globalization that impinge on local realities. Drawing on a critical global citizenship education (GCE) framework and GCE core conceptual dimensions developed by UNESCO, this study assessed the critical dimensions of the social studies curriculum for secondary education in one sub-Saharan African country. Through interviews with teachers, focus groups with students and a review of the social studies teaching syllabus, the study revealed limitations in both content and the pedagogical approach to the delivery of Ghana's current social studies curriculum for senior high schools.


Author(s):  
Thomas Misco ◽  
Nancy Patterson ◽  
Frans Doppen

In a national context of standards and high-stakes testing, concerns are emerging about challenges to the already tenuous position of the citizenship mission in the social studies curriculum. In this qualitative study, the authors administered a survey to social studies teachers in Ohio and conducted follow-up interviews focusing on the present purposes of social studies and the ways in which standards and testing are affecting instructional practice. The findings reveal a perception of standards as being of high quality, yet ultimately undermined through changes in scope and se-quence, narrowing of the curriculum, and a paucity of time to enact them. In addition, respondents indicated that high-stakes testing has become the primary curricular focus, which impacts instructional strategy decision making and frustrates citizenship education.


Author(s):  
Wayne Ross

Social studies education has had a turbulent history as one of the core subjects in the school curriculum. The fundamental content of the social studies curriculum – the study of human enterprise across space and time –however, has always been at the core of educational endeavors. It is generally accepted that the formal introduction of social studies to the school curriculum was instigated by the 1916 report of the National Education Association’s Committee on Social Studies, which emphasized development of citizenship values as a core aim of history and social science education. Earlier commissions of the N.E.A. and American Historical Association heavily influenced the Committee on Social Studies recommendations. The roots of the contemporary social studies curriculum, therefore, can be traced to two distinct curriculum reform efforts: the introduction of academic history into the curriculum and citizenship education. There is widespread agreement that the aim of social studies is citizenship education, that is the preparation of young people so that they possess the knowledge, skills, and values necessary for active participation in society. This apparent consensus, however, has been described as almost meaningless because social studies educators continue to be at odds over curricular content as well as the conception of what it means to be a good citizen. Since its formal introduction into the school, social studies curriculum been the subject of numerous commission and blue-ribbon panel studies, ranging from the sixteen-volume report of the American Historical Association’s Commission on Social Studies in the 1930s to the more recent movement for national curriculum standards. Separate and competing curriculum standards have been published for no less than seven areas of that are part of the social studies curriculum: United States and global history, economics, geography, civics, psychology, and social studies. Social studies curriculum is defined a lack of consensus and has been an ideological battleground with ongoing debates over its nature, purpose, and content. Historically there have been a diverse range of curricular programs that have been a prominent within social studies education at various times, including the life adjustment movement, progressive education, social reconstructionism, and nationalistic history. The debate over the nature, purpose, and content of the social studies curriculum continues today, with competing groups variously arguing for a social issues approach, the disciplinary study of history and geography, or action for social justice as the most appropriate framework for the social studies curriculum.


2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 6
Author(s):  
Kjetil Børhaug

I norsk samanheng har prioriteringa av den demokratiske medborgaropp-sedinga i skulen gradvis blitt sterkare. I 2015 kom Ludvigsenutvalet med sin sluttrapport, Fremtidens skole (NOU, 2015: 8), og året etter Melding til Stortinget 28, Fag – Fordypning – Forståelse (Kunnskapsdepartementet, 2016). Begge signaliserer at demokrati og medborgarskap skal vera eit prioritert, tverrfagleg område. Desse endringsforslaga reiser spørsmålet om kva for demokratisk oppseding vi i norsk skule er på veg mot. Demokratisk danning er ikkje ein eintydig storleik. Demokratisk deltaking vil ta ulike former i ulike institusjonelle kontekstar, og det er derfor eit viktig spørsmål kva arenaer for deltaking medborgaroppsedinga skal peika på. Viktige spørsmål er også om deltakinga skal vera kritisk orientert, eller om den skal avgrensa seg til effektiv problemløysing innanfor kjende rammer. Er deltaking forstått som individuell åtferd eller krev det sosiale og politiske rørsler? Denne artikkelen vil, med utgangspunkt i ein statsvitskapleg tradisjon, gjera greie for slike ulike forståingar av kva for deltaking som er mogeleg kor, og drøfta endringsforslaga i denne samanhengen. Artikkelen konkluderer med at endringsforslaga peikar i retning av ei avpolitisert og individualisert politisk oppseding.Nøkkelord: politisk sosialisering, demokratipolitikk, samfunnsfagdidaktikk, medborgaroppseding A changed citizenship education?AbstractDemocratic citizenship education has become an even more important policy objective for Norwegian compulsory education. A recent expert commission (NOU, 2015: 8) and a governmental white paper (Kunnskapsdepartementet, 2016) discuss how democratic citizenship education can be strengthened. Do these proposals represent a change in Norwegian democratic citizenship education? Of particular importance is what kind of democracy the proposals favour. What participatory arrangements and institutions should students be introduced to? Will a critical perspective be encouraged? Is participation something invididual or is it a collective? This article discusses the proposals in relation to these questions and concludes that Norway seems to be headed towards an individualised, de-politicised citizenship education.Keywords: political socialisation, democratic governance, social studies didactics, citizenship education


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document