Influence Model Comparison of Leadership Style, Intellectual Capital, and Corporate Social Responsibility towards 4 Industrial Sectors Performances

Author(s):  
Rilla Gantino ◽  
Endang Ruswanti ◽  
Taufiqurrahman

Currently, the level of business competition is high that companies need to continuously innovate by utilizing knowledge base. High level of competition is driven by the economic policies of some countries. Singapore (since 2001) and Malaysia (since 2004), countries of southeast Asian region closest to Indonesia, talked about economic reform from labor-based to knowledge-based economy. To create competitive advantages, companies reduce the use of human resources by utilizing technology and information technology in the production to conduct their business activities. This encourages companies in Indonesia to transform so as not to lose out in competition. The company's sustainability will also depend on the loyalty of its consumers or customers. The company will do its utmost to strengthen consumer loyalty including efforts to get their positive value. Consumers who are satisfied with the product quality and CSR disclosure will increase the value of the company and they will be loyal to the company. Furthermore, the next issue is about management in achieving its goal of carrying out management functions at various levels. Leaders at different levels will empower their employees by implementing certain leadership styles. A leader is someone responsible for the work of others in achieving goals. The way leaders impress their subordinates to be cooperative and productive is called leadership style. Through leadership style a leader seeks to mobilize his subordinates to act according to the plan of achieving the company's goals. Leaders should be able to motivate employees to continuously innovate, and to improve employee competency in order to achieve the company's goals. Some researchers have conducted studies on the Influence of Leadership Style, Intellectual Capital, and Corporate Social Responsibility on Performance, and the results are mixed. The objective of this research is analyzing the comparative model of the influence of Leadership Style, Intellectual Capital, and Corporate Social Responsibility on Performance in companies in the sub-sectors of Mining, Pharmacy and Consumption and Household, Basic Industry, Chemical and Infrastructure, Utility and Telecommunication listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) 2012-2018. Keywords: Comparability, Leadership Style, Intellectual Capital, CSR, Performance

Author(s):  
Rilla Gantino ◽  
Endang Ruswanti ◽  
Taufiqur Rachman

Objective – This paper aims to examine the influence of Leadership Style, Intellectual Capital, and Corporate Social Responsibility on Performance in companies in the sub-sectors of Mining, Pharmacy and Consumption and Household, Basic Industry, Chemical and Infrastructure, Utility and Telecommunication listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) 2012-2018. Methodology/Technique – In this research, leadership style is measured transformationally and transactionally. Meanwhile, Intellectual Capital is measured using VAICTM. Furthermore, Corporate Social Responsibility is measured using GRI G4, and Financial Performance is proxied by ROA, ROE, and sales growth. The method used is a saturated sample. The sample in this research was 50 companies in the Basic and Chemical Industry sub-sector, 28 companies in the infrastructure, utilities, and telecommunications sub-sectors, 38 mining sub-sector companies, and 17 companies in the consumer goods sub-sector listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX). This research used secondary data taken from financial and annual reports and primary data obtained through questionnaires for leadership style. The analysis method used is simple regression analysis. Findings & Novelty –The results show that the influence of leadership style, intellectual capital, and corporate social responsibility in the four sectors varies with a positive or negative relationship direction. Intellectual capital has a positive significant influence on ROA, ROE and SG in four sectors. Previous research has focused on only one sector. This study compares the influence of leadership style, intellectual capital, and corporate social responsibility in four sectors Type of Paper: Empirical. JEL Classification: M41, M49. Keywords: Comparison; Leadership Style; Intellectual Capital; CSR; Performance Reference to this paper should be made as follows: Gantino, R; Ruswanti, E; Rachman, T. 2020. Leadership Style, Intellectual Capital and Corporate Social Responsibility on Performance, a Comparison Model of Listed Companies in Indonesia., Acc. Fin. Review, 5 (3): 110 – 120. https://doi.org/10.35609/afr.2020.5.3(3)


2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 1405
Author(s):  
Putu Nesy Swendriani ◽  
Luh Gede Krisna Dewi

This study aims to obtain empirical evidence of the effect of BOPO ratio, intellectual capital, and corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure on profitability of banking companies. Research conducted on banking companies on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) for the 2013-2017 period. The sample is determined through non probability sampling method with purposive sampling technique. The number of samples used in this study were 60 observation samples. The data analysis technique used is the analysis of multiple linear regression analysis. The results of this study indicate that BOPO ratio show a negative effect on profitability of banking companies. The results also show that intellectual capital and CSR disclosure doesn’t affect the probability of banking companies. The research implications theoretically prove stakeholder theory, legitimacy theory, and resource-based theory in explaining the operational efficiency of banking companies. Keywords: BOPO; intellectual capital; CSR; profitability.


ETIKONOMI ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 161-172
Author(s):  
Uun Sunarsih ◽  
N. Nurhikmah

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has a very important role for the company and now become an obligation for every company. The purpose of this study examined the effect of institutional ownership, board of commissioners, profitability and size on CSR disclosure. This research conducted at mining manufacturing companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange period 2013-2014 and obtained 76 sample companies. The method used is multiple regression analysis. The result showed only institutional ownership affecting CSR disclosure. This suggests institutional ownership structure can act in monitoring the company. Independent board has not effected on CSR, it failed to monitor the actions of top management. Profitability has not effected on the disclosure of CSR, it enabled the company to have two perspectives on CSR. The most companies view CSR as a deduction from earnings. CSR disclosure has not affect the size of the CSR disclosure area.DOI: 10.15408/etk.v16i2.5236


2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 95
Author(s):  
Rizki Widya Puspitaningsih ◽  
Hotman Tohir Pohan

<em>The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of ownership structure, profitability, firm size, and firm age on Corporate Social Responsibility disclosure. Sample consists of 87 manufacturing firms in Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2014. Multiple regression test is used to test hypothesis developed in this study. Result of this study show that firm size has significantly positive influence on CSR disclosure, whereas ultimat ownership has significantly negative influence on Corporate Social Responsibility disclosure. Foreignt ownership, blockholder ownership, profitability, and firm age, on the other hand, do not have significant influence on CSR disclosure</em>


2019 ◽  
pp. 1365
Author(s):  
Made Cahyani Prastuti ◽  
I G.A.N. Budiasih

The aim of this research is to know the influence of corporate social responsibility and intellectual capital on financial performance. Theories used are stakeholder, legitimacy, and resource-based theory. This research conducted on trading companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2015-2017. The samples taken were 26 companies, by non-probability sampling method with purposive sampling technique. Data collected through non-participant observation. The analysis techniques used are descriptive statistical analysis, classical assumptions, and multiple linear analysis. Based on the analysis found that corporate social responsibility has no effect on financial performance. This indicates that the high and low disclosure of CSR will not affect the financial performance of the trade sector. The second hypothesis states that intellectual capital has a positive effect on financial performance. This indicates that the higher the intellectual capital, the higher the financial performance of the company. Combination of intellectual capital can enhance competitive advantage for companies. Keywords: Financial performance, corporate social responsibility, intellectual capital


2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 218-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tom Bason ◽  
Christos Anagnostopoulos

Purpose – Under growing public scrutiny of their behaviour, the vast majority of multinational enterprises (MNEs) have been undertaking significant investments through corporate social responsibility (CSR) in order to close legitimacy gaps. The purpose of this paper is to provide a descriptive account of the nature and scope of MNEs’ CSR programmes that have sport at their core. More specifically, the present study addresses the following questions. First, how do Financial Times Stock Exchange (FTSE) 100 firms utilise sport as part of their CSR agendas? Second, how do different industries have different approaches to CSR through sport? And third, can the types of CSR through sport be classified? Design/methodology/approach – Centred on legitimacy theory and exploratory in nature, the study employed a content analysis method, and examined three types of document from each of the FTSE100 firms, namely, annual reports, annual reviews and CSR reports over the ten-year period from 2003 to 2012. In total, 1,473 documents were content analysed, thereby offering a sound representation of CSR disclosure of the FTSE100. Findings – From the analysis, three main streams emerged: “Philanthropy”, “Sponsorships” and “Personnel engagement” with the first showing the smallest growth compared with the other main streams. Findings show the general rise in CSR through sport, thereby demonstrating that the corporate world has practically acknowledged that the sporting context is a powerful vehicle for the employment of CSR. Originality/value – Previous empirical studies have sought to investigate CSR through sport, yet they have generally suffered from sampling limitations which have, in turn, rendered the drawing of reliable conclusions problematic. Particularly, the lack of an explicit focus on longitudinality is a typical limitation, meaning that no conclusions can be made regarding the trend. The study outlined in this paper offers the most comprehensive longitudinal study of CSR through sport to date, and thus contributes to the increasing volume of literature that examines the application of CSR in relation to the sport sector.


2018 ◽  
Vol 60 (4) ◽  
pp. 979-987 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nurleni Nurleni ◽  
Agus Bandang ◽  
Darmawati Darmawati ◽  
Amiruddin Amiruddin

PurposeThis study aims to analyze the effect of ownership structure that consists of managerial ownership and institutional ownership of the extensive of corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure.Design/methodology/approachThe population in this study is manufacturing companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange (BEI), as the manufacturing companies are considered to have great potential on environmental damage (Mathews, 2000). The selected sample were the companies which meet certain criteria (purposive sampling) which published the complete annual financial statements from 2011 to 2015. This study used an analysis method using partial least square (WarpPLS) to assess the effect of the structure of ownership consists of managerial ownership and institutional ownership on the extent of the CSR disclosure.FindingsThe results showed that there is a direct effect of a negative and significant correlation between managerial ownership on CSR disclosure, and there is a direct effect of a positive and significant correlation between institutional ownership on CSR disclosure.Originality/valueOriginality of this paper shows PLS (WarpPLS) that applied to determine the effect between variables managerial and institutional ownership on CSR disclosure. This research is collected data financial statements and annual reports of manufacturing companies obtained from the Indonesia Capital Market Reference Center (PRPM), which is located in the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX), which there has not been research by the methods and the same location.


2019 ◽  
pp. 510
Author(s):  
Kadek Novia Suastyani ◽  
I Gede Ary Wirajaya

 This study purpose to determine the effect of intellectual capital, corporate social responsibility disclosure on market performance. This research was conducted on banking companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2014-2016, namely as many as 43 companies. Samples were taken using non-probability sampling techniques with purposive sampling method. Obtained 23 companies with 69 total observations. The data analysis technique used is multiple linear regression analysis. The results of the analysis prove that companies that are able to process value added well will affect market performance. This study also found that the more items disclosure of CSR disclosure disclosed by the company will improve market performance. Keywords: intellectual capital, corporate social responsibility disclosure, market performance


Author(s):  
Ayunita Ajengtiyas Saputri Mashuri

<p><em>This study uses quantitative research that aims to see whether tax aggressiveness and leverage have an effect on the disclosure of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) with profitability as variable moderation. This study was use a manufacturing company within sub-sector of consumer goods industry listed on the </em><em>“</em><em>Indonesia Stock Exchange. Samples were selected by purposive sampling and collected 16 companies of consumer goods industry sub-sectors during 2014-2018 research datas period. Testing the hypothesis in this  study using </em><em>“</em><em>Multiple Linear Regression Analysis with</em><em>”</em><em> a significance level of 5% (0.05). The results of this study indicates that;(1) Tax aggressiveness </em><em>“</em><em>has a significant effect on</em><em>”</em><em> CSR disclosure, (2) </em><em>“</em><em>Leverage does not have a significant effect on CSR disclosure</em><em>”</em><em>, (</em><em>“</em><em>3) Profitability measured using Return on Assets (ROA</em><em>”</em><em>) is able to strengthen Tax Aggressiveness and unable to strengthen leverage to influence CSR disclosure. Tax aggressiveness and leverage and profitability variables as moderating variables can explain the CSR disclosure variable by 52.1%.</em></p>


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 185-190
Author(s):  
Wike Mardiana ◽  
Anik Irawati

This study aims to analyze factors influence Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure in palm oil plantation companies in Indonesia and Malaysia. This study analyzes influences of total assets, profitability, leverage, independent proportion of commissioners, the proportion of independent audit committee. This study is conduct on financial reports published in Indonesia and Malaysia. Methods of data collection are taken from the annual financial statements in Indonesia Stock Exchange of 17 companies and Bursa Malaysia of 22 companies. Data analysis techniques used multiple regressions. The results showed that; 1) there is no influence of total asset, profitability, leverage, and proportion of independent audit committee in palm oil plantation companies in Indonesia and Malaysia; 2) there is influence of independent board of commissioner on CSR disclosure practices in palm oil plantation companies Indonesia and Malaysia


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document