OVARIAN MASQUERADES: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF FROZEN SECTION
REPORTING OF OVARIAN MASSES WITH FINAL HISTOPATHOLOGICAL
DIAGNOSIS AT A TERTIARY CANCER CENTRE: A TWO YEAR STUDY.
Introduction: Intraoperative assessment of ovarian neoplasms on Frozen section (FS) as epithelial and non-epithelial types is crucial for appropriate surgical management. Accurate categorization is important as treatment plan includes cystectomy for benign tumors, extensive staging procedures for ovarian carcinomas and oophorectomy or limited surgical staging for borderline tumors especially in younger patients to preserve fertility. Objectives: To study the accuracy of ovarian FS interpretation with reference to nal histopathological (HPE) diagnosis on parafn embedded sections after analyzing by morphology and immunohistochemistry (IHC) wherever necessary. Materials and Methods:Aretrospective analysis of 170 cases of FS study on ovarian masses during the period of two years (2017, 2018) was done at a tertiary oncology center. Results: Of the total 170 cases on frozen, 74 cases were benign, 27 cases borderline and 69 cases malignant. On nal HPE 73 cases were benign, 20 cases borderline and 77 cases malignant neoplasms. The sensitivity and specicity were 95.89%, 95.87% in benign tumors, 80%, 92.66% in borderline and 88.3%, 98.92% in malignant tumors respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were 94.59%, 96.87% in benign lesions, 59.25%, 97.20% in borderline, 98.55%, and 91.08% in malignant neoplasms respectively. Conclusions:In our study there was a good concordance between frozen and nal histopathology in the diagnosis of benign and malignant ovarian neoplasms. Ovarian FS study is a reliable tool for intraoperative decision making regarding the extent of surgery