scholarly journals Treatment of Humeral Diaphyseal Fractures with Flexible Intramedullary Wires (Kirschner Wires): About 40 Cases

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-33
Author(s):  
  Youness Dahmani ◽  
Ayoub Mjidila ◽  
Reda Allah Bassir ◽  
Moncef Boufettal ◽  
Mohamed Kharmaz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kirschner Wires ◽  
Diaphyseal Fractures

scholarly journals TREATMENT OF DIAPHYSEAL FRACTURES OF THE METACARPAL BONES

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Saodat Asilova ◽  
Azizjon Khaydarov
Keyword(s):  
Hand Function ◽  
Full Recovery ◽  
Wedge Osteotomy ◽  
Kirschner Wires ◽  
Metacarpal Bones ◽  
Diaphyseal Fractures

Presented the experience of the application of stable osteosynthesisby three Kirschner wires on diaphyseal fractures of the metacarpal bones at 74 patients.Indications for osteosynthesiswas opened (6%), closed (94%), non-united, mal-unitedfractures and false joints of metacarpal bonesdiaphysis. Patients were performed intraosseous anesthesia atdistal epimetaphysisarea of radial bone.Describeda method of operation extramedullaryosteosynthesis using three Kirschner wires. Also,describedmethod of wedge osteotomy for full recovery of hand function. Good results were obtained in 83.1% of patients, satisfactory at 13.6%, and unsatisfactory results in 3.4% of patients

Migration of Kirschner Wires after Surgical Stabiliziation of Shoulder Injuries - Four Case Reports

Swiss Surgery ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 281-287 ◽  
Author(s):  
Schindele ◽  
Hackenbruch ◽  
Sutter ◽  
Schärer ◽  
Leutenegger
Keyword(s):  
Case Reports ◽  
Shoulder Injuries ◽  
Kirschner Wires ◽  
Klinische Symptome

Häufige Frakturen im Bereich der Schulter betreffen je nach Alter die Clavicula oder den proximalen Humerus. Die Indikation zur operativen Stabilisierung ist bei Luxationsfrakturen des lateralen Claviculaendes und bei instabilen und dislozierten Frakturen des proximalen Humerus grosszügig zu stellen. Werden Kirschner-Drähte zur Osteosynthese eingesetzt muss in hohem Masse mit Drahtwanderungen oder Drahtbrüchen gerechnet werden. In mehreren Fällen wird in der Literatur auf diese Komplikation hingewiesen. Anhand von vier Fallbeispielen möchten wir Ursachen und technische Voraussetzungen aufzeigen, die bei dieser operativen Variante zu lebensbedrohlichen Komplikationen durch eine sekundäre Migration führen können. Dies unter Umständen nach Jahren und ohne klinische Symptome. Die Indikation zur Kirschnerdraht-Osteosynthese muss vor allem bei vorliegender Osteoporose zurückhaltend gestellt werden. Regelmässige Kontrollen in der postoperativen Phase werden empfohlen, die Entfernung der Drähte sollte bei konsolidierter Fraktur frühzeitig geplant werden.

T1.12 Humerus diaphyseal fractures treatment with intramedullary nail in adults

Injury ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 44 ◽  
pp. S4
Author(s):  
T. Kurtulmus ◽  
G. Saka ◽  
N. Saglam ◽  
F. Kücükdurmaz ◽  
U. Öztürk
Keyword(s):  
Intramedullary Nail ◽  
Diaphyseal Fractures

Danger zone for screw placement in minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) of diaphyseal fractures of forearm: a cadaveric study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Apipop Kritsaneephaiboon ◽  
Watit Wuttimanop ◽  
Surasak Jitprapaikulsarn ◽  
Pornpanit Dissaneewate ◽  
Chulin Chewakidakarn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Plate Osteosynthesis ◽  
Cadaveric Study ◽  
Screw Placement ◽  
Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis ◽  
Danger Zone ◽  
Diaphyseal Fractures

Complications Following Tension-Band Fixation of Patellar Fractures with Cannulated Screws Compared with Kirschner Wires

2013 ◽  
Vol 95 (7) ◽  
pp. 653-659 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Max Hoshino ◽  
Wesley Tran ◽  
John V. Tiberi ◽  
Mary Helen Black ◽  
Bonnie H. Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tension Band ◽  
Cannulated Screws ◽  
Kirschner Wires ◽  
Patellar Fractures

scholarly journals Metacarpal shaft fixation: a biomechanical comparison of dorsal plating, lag screws, and headless compression screws

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Felix G. E. Dyrna ◽  
Daniel M. Avery ◽  
Ryu Yoshida ◽  
David Lam ◽  
Simon Oeckenpöhler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peak Load ◽  
Rigid Fixation ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Shaft Fractures ◽  
Metacarpal Shaft ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Load To Failure ◽  
Headless Compression Screws ◽  
Diaphyseal Fractures ◽  
Dorsal Plating

Abstract Background Metacarpal shaft fractures are common and can be treated nonoperatively. Shortening, angulation, and rotational deformity are indications for surgical treatment. Various forms of treatment with advantages and disadvantages have been documented. The purpose of the study was to determine the stability of fracture fixation with intramedullary headless compression screws in two types of metacarpal shaft fractures and compare them to other common forms of rigid fixation: dorsal plating and lag screw fixation. It was hypothesized that headless compression screws would demonstrate a biomechanical stronger construct. Methods Five matched paired hands (age 60.9 ± 4.6 years), utilizing non-thumb metacarpals, were used for comparative fixation in two fracture types created by an osteotomy. In transverse diaphyseal fractures, fixation by headless compression screws (n = 7) and plating (n = 8) were compared. In long oblique diaphyseal fractures, headless compression screws (n = 8) were compared with plating (n = 8) and lag screws (n = 7). Testing was performed using an MTS frame producing an apex dorsal, three point bending force. Peak load to failure and stiffness were calculated from the load-displacement curve generated. Results For transverse fractures, headless compression screws had a significantly higher stiffness and peak load to failure, means 249.4 N/mm and 584.8 N, than plates, means 129.02 N/mm and 303.9 N (both p < 0.001). For long oblique fractures, stiffness and peak load to failure for headless compression screws were means 209 N/mm and 758.4 N, for plates 258.7 N/mm and 518.5 N, and for lag screws 172.18 N/mm and 234.11 N. There was significance in peak load to failure for headless compression screws vs plates (p = 0.023), headless compression screws vs lag screws (p < 0.001), and plates vs lag screws (p = 0.009). There was no significant difference in stiffness between groups. Conclusion Intramedullary fixation of diaphyseal metacarpal fractures with a headless compression screw provides excellent biomechanical stability. Coupled with lower risks for adverse effects, headless compression screws may be a preferable option for those requiring rapid return to sport or work. Level of evidence Basic Science Study, Biomechanics.

Minimally Invasive Reduction of Intraarticular Calcaneal Fractures With Percutaneous Fixation Using Cannulated Screws Versus Kirschner Wires: A Retrospective Comparative Study

2021 ◽  
pp. 193864002098775
Author(s):  
Ahmed Shams ◽  
Osama Gamal ◽  
Mohamed Kamal Mesregah
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Cannulated Screws ◽  
Kirschner Wires ◽  
Calcaneal Fractures ◽  
K Wires ◽  
Retrospective Comparative Study ◽  
Minimally Invasive Reduction

Background Several minimally invasive techniques were developed for management of intraarticular calcaneal fractures. This study aimed to compare the functional and radiological outcomes of 2 minimally invasive reduction and fixation techniques using cannulated screws or Kirschner wires (K-wires) for fixation. Methods This study was a retrospective comparative review of patients with displaced intraarticular calcaneal fractures, who were treated with cannulated screws or K-wires techniques. Clinical and radiological data were collected and compared between both groups. Functional outcomes and patient satisfaction using the Maryland Foot Score (MFS) and the visual analogue scale (VAS) of pain, in addition to the complications, were compared between both groups. Results In total, 70 patients were included in the study: 34 in the cannulated screws group, with a mean age of 35.2 ± 4 years, and 36 in the K-wires groups, with a mean age of 33.4 ± 3 years. The operative time was shorter in the K-wires group (40.5 ± 5.6 minutes) compared to the cannulated screw group (49.5 ± 4.5 minutes), P < .001. There were no statistically significant differences between both groups regarding the radiological parameters, including Bohler’s angle, angle of Gissane, calcaneal width, height, or length. The mean MFS, mean VAS, and complications were not different between the 2 groups. Conclusion Treatment of displaced intraarticular calcaneal fractures with minimally invasive reduction and fixation using either cannulated screws or K-wires can achieve similar excellent functional and radiological outcomes, with high patient satisfaction. The use of K-wires has the advantage of reduced operative time than cannulated screws. Levels of Evidence: Level III: Retrospective comparative study

A comparison of intramedullary cannulated screws versus miniplates for fixation of unstable metacarpal diaphyseal fractures

2021 ◽  
pp. 175319342110215
Author(s):  
Birkan Kibar ◽  
Ali Cavit ◽  
Abdullah Örs
Keyword(s):  
Plate Fixation ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Good Alternative ◽  
Active Movement ◽  
Cannulated Screws ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Visual Analogue Pain ◽  
Plate Group ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Diaphyseal Fractures

We carried out a prospective randomized study to compare the clinical and radiological results of metacarpal diaphyseal fractures treated with retrograde intramedullary headless cannulated screws (IHCS) and plates. Fractures were fixed with IHCS in 34 patients (37 metacarpals) and locked miniplates in 35 patients (40 metacarpals). The mean age was 33 years (range 18–61) in the IHCS group and 32 years (range 17–68) in plate group. All patients were followed up for 1 year. All fractures in the IHCS group united but there was one nonunion in the plate group. At final follow-up, there was no significant difference between the groups in total active movement, visual analogue pain score, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score and grip strength, although the study was not sufficiently powered to exclude differences with certainty. IHCS is a safe and fast technique that is a good alternative to plate fixation in metacarpal diaphyseal fractures. Level of evidence: I

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document