scholarly journals THE FINANCIAL AND LEGAL ASPECTS OF REGULATION OF COMPULSORY SOCIAL MEDICAL INSURANCE IN UKRAINE

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (9) ◽  
pp. 89-91
Author(s):  
Zoria Zhuravlyova ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Insurance ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Social Health Insurance ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Legal Aspects ◽  
Social Health ◽  
Balanced Budget ◽  
Social Medical Insurance ◽  
Legal Mechanism

The article, by analyzing the legal acts and the results of research in the field of regulation of relations on compulsory social health insurance, considers some legal aspects of financial and legal regulation of health insurance in Ukraine. The author emphasizes the importance of introducing the institution of compulsory social health insurance, as its development and introduction of financial and legal mechanism for regulating relations in this area is a guarantee of balanced budget spending on medicine, proper implementation of citizens' rights to health care. It is determined that all these issues concerning the formation of financial funds formed in health insurance, their replenishment, distribution and use, have a public financial nature, and therefore require and are subject to financial and legal regulation. The conclusion on the content of financial and legal regulation of compulsory social health insurance as a system of legal means of government regulation of the organization and activities of subjects and objects of management in the field of health care.

scholarly journals Impacts of the type of social health insurance on health service utilisation and expenditures: implications for a unified system in China

2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 468-486 ◽  
Author(s):  
Si Ying Tan ◽  
Xun Wu ◽  
Wei Yang
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Insurance ◽  
Insurance Coverage ◽  
Social Health Insurance ◽  
Rapid Expansion ◽  
Social Health ◽  
Service Utilisation ◽  
Provider Payment ◽  
Out Of Pocket Payments ◽  
The Impact

AbstractWhile moving towards unified social health insurance (SHI) is often a politically popular policy reform in countries where rapid expansion in health insurance coverage has given rise to the segmentation of SHI systems as different SHI schemes were rolled out to serve different populations, the potential impacts of reform on service utilisation and health costs have not been systematically studied. Using data from the Chinese Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS), we compared the mean costs incurred for both inpatient and outpatient care under different health insurance schemes, and the impact of different SHI schemes on treatment utilisation and health care costs using a two-part model. Our results show that Urban Employee Medical Insurance, which offers the most generous benefits, incurs the highest total costs prior to reimbursement when compared to other SHI schemes. Our analysis also shows that utilisation of SHI did not show significant reduction in out-of-pocket payments for outpatients. We argue that, unless effective measures are introduced to deal with perverse provider payment incentives, the move towards a unified system with more generous benefits may usher in a new wave of cost escalation for health care systems in China.

scholarly journals Factors Affecting Enrollment in Government Health Insurance Program in Kailali District

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 388-393
Author(s):  
Deepak Raj Paudel
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Insurance ◽  
Chronic Illness ◽  
Social Health Insurance ◽  
Social Health ◽  
Factors Affecting ◽  
Government Health ◽  
Insurance Program ◽  
Health Insurance Program ◽  
Insurance Enrollment

Background: Health care financial burden on households is high in Nepal. High health care expenditure is a major obstacle in achieving universal health coverage. The health insurance is expected to reduce healthcare expenditure. However, only small segments of the population are covered by health insurance in Nepal.This study assessed the factors affecting enrollment in government health insurance program in the first piloted district, Kailali, Nepal.Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 1048 households located in 26 wards of Kailali district after 21 months of the implementation of social health insurance program, Nepal. The sample was selected in two stages, first stage being the selection of wards and second, being the households.Results: The higher level of household economic status was associated with increased odds of enrollment in health insurance program (ORs=4.99, 5.04, 5.13, 8.05, for second, third, fourth, and the highest quintile of households, respectively). A higher level of head’s education was associated with increased odds of health insurance enrollment (ORs = 1.58, 1.78, 2.36, for primary, secondary, tertiary education, respectively). Presence of chronic illness in the household was positively associated with increased odds of health insurance enrollment (OR= 1.29). Conclusions: The poor and low educated groups were less benefited by social health insurance program in Kailali district, Nepal. Hence, policymakers should focus to implement income-based premium scheme for ensuring equal access to healthcare.Since household with chronic illness leads to high odds of being enrolled, a compulsory health insurance scheme can make the program financially sustainable.Keywords: Enrollment; health expenditure; health insurance; inequality; Nepal.

scholarly journals Willingness to Pay for Social Health Insurance and Associated Factors among Health Care Providers in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Abel Mekonne ◽  
Benyam Seifu ◽  
Chernet Hailu ◽  
Alemayehu Atomsa
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Insurance ◽  
Willingness To Pay ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Health Professionals ◽  
Addis Ababa ◽  
Social Health Insurance ◽  
Social Health ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
The Government

Background. Cost sharing between beneficiaries and government is critical to attain universal health coverage. The government of Ethiopia introduced social health insurance to improve access to quality health services. Hence, HCP are the ultimate frontline service provider; their WTP for health insurance could influence the implementation of the scheme directly or indirectly. However, there is limited evidence on willingness to pay (WTP) for social health insurance (SHI) among health professionals. Methods. A cross-sectional study was conducted in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, from May 1st to August 15th, 2019. A total sample of 480 health care providers was selected using a multistage sampling method. The collected data were entered into Epi Info version 7.1 and analyzed with SPSS version 23. Binary and multiple logistic regression analysis was carried out to identify the associated factor outcome variable. The association was presented in odds ratio with 95% confidence interval and significance determined at a P value less than 0.05. Result. A total of 460 health care providers responded to the questionnaire, making a 95.8% response rate. Of the respondents, only 132 (28.7%) were WTP for SHI. Higher educational status [AOR=2.9, 95% CI (1.2-7.3)], higher monthly income [AOR=2.2, 95% CI (1.2-4.3)], recent family illness [AOR=2.4, 95% CI (1.4-4.4)], and a good awareness about SHI [AOR=4.4, 95% CI (2.4-7.8)] showed significant association with WTP for SHI. The main reasons for not WTP were thinking the government should cover the cost, preferring out-pocket payment and the provided SHI scheme does not cover all the health care costs health care providers lost interest in pay for SHI. Conclusion and Recommendation. The majority of health care providers were not willing to pay for the introduced SHI scheme. The provided SHI scheme should be clear and provide special consideration for health care providers as the majority of them receives free health care service from their employer health care institution. Also, the government, health professional associations, and other concerned stakeholders should provide awareness creation programs by targeting low and middle-level health professionals in order to increase WTP for SHI among health care providers.

Social Health Insurance in Europe: Basic Concepts and New Principles

2019 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 665-677
Author(s):  
Claus Wendt
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Insurance ◽  
Social Insurance ◽  
Health Care Systems ◽  
Social Health Insurance ◽  
Social Health ◽  
Traditional Values ◽  
The Public ◽  
Recent Developments ◽  
Care Systems

Abstract This article discusses recent developments in and new principles of European social health insurance (SHI). It analyses how privatization policies and competition have altered social insurance and whether financial difficulties are caused by social insurance features not evident in other types of health care systems. There is little if any evidence that SHI causes higher cost increases than other types of systems. The comparison of five European SHI systems demonstrates that despite cost containment policies these countries do not experience a trust crisis in health care or loss in support among the public. The author shows that SHI has moved toward universal health care and that the traditional values of solidarity and social security have even been strengthened over the past decades.

Umverteilungseffekte in der Finanzierung von Gesundheitsleistungen / Redistribution Effects of Health Care Financing

2007 ◽  
Vol 227 (5-6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Florian Buchner ◽  
Rebecca Deppisch ◽  
Jürgen Wasem
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Insurance ◽  
Health Care Systems ◽  
Health Care Financing ◽  
Social Health Insurance ◽  
Health Care Expenditures ◽  
Social Health ◽  
Financing System ◽  
Out Of Pocket Payments ◽  
Care Systems

SummaryHealth care systems are financed through a mixture of different components: taxes, contributions to social health insurance, premiums to private health insurance, out of pocket payments by patients. These components can be combined differently leading to specific effects of interpersonal redistribution. This can be compared between different countries. In such a comparison the redistributional impact of the German health care systems is rather regressive - which is basically caused by the opportunity for people with high income to leave social health insurance. In comparison to a health insurance system with risk rated premiums, financing of the German social health insurance leads to interpersonal redistribution from higher to lower income, from the young to the elderly, from healthy to sick and from singles to families with children. The pay-as-you-go character of the system leads especially in combination with an aging population and technological change to burden for future generations. In comparison to a system in which each region finances its own health care expenditures, there are also considerable interregional redistributions. The financing system in Germany is not conceptually consistent. Reform proposals (unified health insurance for all; flat rate premiums) tackle these inconsistencies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document