scholarly journals Surgical Outcome of Microvascular Decompression for Trigerminal Neuralgia in Terms of Pain Control Using Visual Analogue Scale

2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
RIAZ-UR- REHMAN ◽  
MUHAMMAD NAWAZ KHAN ◽  
ATTIYA NASIR SIDDIQUE ◽  
AKBAR JAMAL
Keyword(s):  
Pain Relief ◽  
Visual Analogue Scale ◽  
Trigeminal Neuralgia ◽  
Pain Control ◽  
Analogue Scale ◽  
Visual Analogue Score ◽  
Definitive Treatment ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Good Pain Relief ◽  
Vascular Decompression

Objective:  The aim of conducting this study was to evaluate the outcome of a Micro vascular Decompression procedure for the definitive treatment of Trigeminal Neuralgia in our setup. Material and Methods:  This observational prospective study was carried out in Neurosurgery unit Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar. A total of 50 patients operated for micro vascular decompression surgeries were enrolled in the study, both genders and any age were in inclusion criteria. Patients previously operated for trigeminal neuralgia were excluded from the study. Post operatively all patients were followed for 1year to calculate the outcome in terms of pain control using visual analogue score (VAS). Immediate pain relief during the first post-operative week and trigeminal neuralgia pain at 1 year post op were recorded and  graded into three categories based on Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) such as Excellent: 0-2 , Good: 3-6, Fail/Poor: 7 – 10. Results:  50 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. 22 were male & 28 were female with an age range from 42-78 years. Average duration of disease was 5 years. In 30 patients, clinically v2-v3 were predominantly involved, in remaining 14 patient v1-v2 were involved & only in 6 patients all three branches were involved. Among all operated 50 patients 18(36%) had excellent pain relief, 26 (52%) had good pain relief & 6 (12%) had fail/poor pain relief. Conclusion:  From this data it was concluded that micro vascular decompression is an effective surgical procedure in relieving pain of trigeminal neuralgia in patients who are refractive to medical treatment.

Pentazocine Suppositories versus Pethidine Injections in 500 Patients with Post-Operative Pain

1979 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 592-600 ◽  
Author(s):  
E N Copsidas ◽  
J N Ward-McQuaid
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
Visual Analogue Scale ◽  
Severe Pain ◽  
Analogue Scale ◽  
Moderate Pain ◽  
Gynaecological Surgery ◽  
Good Relationship ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
Good Pain Relief

Pentazocine (Fortral) suppositories (50 mg) were compared with pethidine (100 mg) by injection in 500 patients after general and gynaecological surgery. Pain was assessed by patients using a pain thermometer, (a modification of a visual analogue scale), and by observers using an adjectival scale. There was a good relationship between these methods. Good pain relief was obtained with both drugs and there was little difference between the treatments in moderate pain. Pethidine was faster and more effective, particularly in severe pain. There were fewer side-effects with pentazocine suppositories. They are a useful alternative to injections, especially in moderate pain.

Outcome Predictors After Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Recurrent Trigeminal Neuralgia

Neurosurgery ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 67 (6) ◽  
pp. 1637-1645 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hideyuki Kano ◽  
Douglas Kondziolka ◽  
Huai-Che Yang ◽  
Oscar Zorro ◽  
Javier Lobato-Polo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pain Relief ◽  
Trigeminal Neuralgia ◽  
Gamma Knife ◽  
Pain Control ◽  
Surgical Procedure ◽  
Gamma Knife Radiosurgery ◽  
Sensory Loss ◽  
Failed Surgery ◽  
Gamma Knife Stereotactic Radiosurgery

Abstract BACKGROUND: Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) that recurs after surgery can be difficult to manage. OBJECTIVE: To define management outcomes in patients who underwent gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery (GKSR) after failing 1 or more previous surgical procedures. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed outcomes after GKSR in 193 patients with TN after failed surgery. The median patient age was 70 years (range, 26-93 years). Seventy-five patients had a single operation (microvascular decompression, n = 40; glycerol rhizotomy, n = 24; radiofrequency rhizotomy, n = 11). One hundred eighteen patients underwent multiple operations before GKSR. Patients were evaluated up to 14 years after GKSR. RESULTS: After GKSR, 85% of patients achieved pain relief or improvement (Barrow Neurological Institute grade I-IIIb). Pain recurrence was observed in 73 of 168 patients 6 to 144 months after GKSR (median, 6 years). Factors associated with better long-term pain relief included no relief from the surgical procedure preceding GKSR, pain in a single branch, typical TN, and a single previous failed surgical procedure. Eighteen patients (9.3%) developed new or increased trigeminal sensory dysfunction, and 1 developed deafferentation pain. Patients who developed sensory loss after GKSR had better long-term pain control (Barrow Neurological Institute grade I-IIIb: 86% at 5 years). CONCLUSION: GKSR proved to be safe and moderately effective in the management of TN that recurs after surgery. Development of sensory loss may predict better long-term pain control. The best candidates for GKSR were patients with recurrence after a single failed previous operation and those with typical TN in a single trigeminal nerve distribution.

scholarly journals Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Primary and Secondary Trigeminal Neuralgia

Neurosurgery ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 66 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sunil K Gupta
Keyword(s):  
Pain Relief ◽  
Trigeminal Neuralgia ◽  
Microvascular Decompression ◽  
Treatment Modality ◽  
Pain Control ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Gamma Knife Radiosurgery ◽  
Clinical Criteria ◽  
Grade Iii

Abstract INTRODUCTION Trigeminal neuralgia has always been a disease of conflict from pathological and management perspectives. Despite advances in the radiological imaging, evidence from autopsy studies, and intraoperative findings, concrete answers are not in sight. GKRS has been a strong contender among available treatment options for the management of trigeminal neuralgia. METHODS All patients were evaluated on clinical criteria, BNI scale for intensity of pain, and facial hypoesthesia (if any) in a protocol-based manner. Only patients with BNI III to V were offered GKRS as a treatment modality. The Marseille point was targeted with a 70 to 90 Gy dose at 50% isodose. Patients were informed about all available treatment options with long-term prognosis and pain control rates. Patients in need of an immediate pain relief, in failed GKRS, and in a severe pain jeopardizing routine life and eating habits were not offered GKRS and were managed with microvascular decompression. RESULTS A total of 108 (65 males, 43 females) patients received GKRS with the Perfexion model since 2009. Eighty-two percent of the patients received GKRS for primary trigeminal neuralgia, while the rest received GKRS for secondary trigeminal neuralgia due to skull base lesions (meningioma, schwannoma, cerebellar AVM, etc). A total of 78% of the patients had preoperative BNI scale IV, while 19% and 3% of the patients had grade III and V scale pain, respectively. Ninety-four percent patients gained BNI scale III intensity pain within 3 mo of GKRS. The 3-yr pain control rate (BNI I-II) could be attained in 81% of the patients. Twelve percent of the patients remained in BNI grade III. Two patients needed redo GKRS for their pain recurrence. CONCLUSION It remains uncontested that MVD provides the best long-term pain-free control in patients of trigeminal neuralgia; however, GKRS remains a valuable feasible option for a selected group of patients. GKRS should be offered as an alternative treatment modality in patients not in urgent need of pain relief. In failed GKRS, authors did not encounter any difficulty in microvascular decompression.

scholarly journals Efficacy of primary microvascular decompression versus subsequent microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia

2017 ◽  
Vol 126 (5) ◽  
pp. 1691-1697 ◽  
Author(s):  
Debebe Theodros ◽  
C. Rory Goodwin ◽  
Matthew T. Bender ◽  
Xin Zhou ◽  
Tomas Garzon-Muvdi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pain Relief ◽  
Trigeminal Neuralgia ◽  
Trigeminal Nerve ◽  
Microvascular Decompression ◽  
Pain Control ◽  
Surgical Intervention ◽  
Patient Records ◽  
Duration Of Symptoms ◽  
Facial Numbness ◽  
Lancinating Pain

OBJECTIVETrigeminal neuralgia (TN) is characterized by intermittent, paroxysmal, and lancinating pain along the distribution of the trigeminal nerve. Microvascular decompression (MVD) directly addresses compression of the trigeminal nerve. The purpose of this study was to determine whether patients undergoing MVD as their first surgical intervention experience greater pain control than patients who undergo subsequent MVD.METHODSA retrospective review of patient records from 1998 to 2015 identified a total of 942 patients with TN and 500 patients who underwent MVD. After excluding several cases, 306 patients underwent MVD as their first surgical intervention and 175 patients underwent subsequent MVD. Demographics and clinicopathological data and outcomes were obtained for analysis.RESULTSIn patients who underwent subsequent MVD, surgical intervention was performed at an older age (55.22 vs 49.98 years old, p < 0.0001) and the duration of symptoms was greater (7.22 vs 4.45 years, p < 0.0001) than for patients in whom MVD was their first surgical intervention. Patients who underwent initial MVD had improved pain relief and no improvement in pain rates compared with those who had subsequent MVD (95.8% and 4.2% vs 90.3% and 9.7%, respectively, p = 0.0041). Patients who underwent initial MVD had significantly lower rates of facial numbness in the pre- and postoperative periods compared with patients who underwent subsequent MVD (p < 0.0001). The number of complications in both groups was similar (p = 0.4572).CONCLUSIONSThe results demonstrate that patients who underwent other procedures prior to MVD had less pain relief and a higher incidence of facial numbness despite rates of complications similar to patients who underwent MVD as their first surgical intervention.

scholarly journals Recurrent or refractory trigeminal neuralgia after microvascular decompression, radiofrequency ablation, or radiosurgery

2005 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rene O. Sanchez-Mejia ◽  
Mary Limbo ◽  
Jason S. Cheng ◽  
Joaquin Camara ◽  
Mariann M. Ward ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
Trigeminal Neuralgia ◽  
Microvascular Decompression ◽  
Initial Treatment ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Good Pain Relief ◽  
Facial Numbness ◽  
Neurosurgical Treatment ◽  
Lancinating Pain

Object Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is characterized by paroxysmal lancinating pain in the trigeminal nerve distribution. When TN is refractory to medical management, patients are referred for microvascular decompression (MVD), radiofrequency ablation, or radiosurgery. After the initial treatment, patients may have refractory or recurrent symptoms requiring retreatment. The purpose of this study was to determine what factors are associated with the need for retreatment and which modality is most effective. Methods To define this population further, the authors evaluated a cohort of patients who required retreatment for TN. The mean follow-up periods were 51 months from the first treatment and 23 months from the last one, and these were comparable among treatment groups. Conclusions Trigeminal neuralgia can recur after neurosurgical treatment. In this study the authors demonstrate that the number of patients requiring retreatment is not negligible. Lower retreatment rates were seen in patients who initially underwent radiosurgery, compared with those in whom MVD or radiofrequency ablation were performed. Radiosurgery was more likely to be the final treatment for recurrent TN regardless of the initial treatment. After retreatment, the majority of patients attained complete or very good pain relief. Pain relief after retreatment correlates with postoperative facial numbness.

scholarly journals Assessment of pain control, quality of life, and predictors of success after gamma knife surgery for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia

2005 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ajay Jawahar ◽  
Rishi Wadhwa ◽  
Caglar Berk ◽  
Gloria Caldito ◽  
Allyson Delaune ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
Trigeminal Neuralgia ◽  
Gamma Knife ◽  
Pain Control ◽  
Gamma Knife Surgery ◽  
Patient Satisfaction Score

Object There are various surgical treatment alternatives for trigeminal neuralgia (TN), but there is no single scale that can be used uniformly to assess and compare one type of intervention with the others. In this study the objectives were to determine factors associated with pain control, pain-free survival, residual pain, and recurrence after gamma knife surgery (GKS) treatment for TN, and to correlate the patients' self-reported quality of life (QOL) and satisfaction with the aforementioned factors. Methods Between the years 2000 and 2004, the authors treated 81 patients with medically refractory TN by using GKS. Fifty-two patients responded to a questionnaire regarding pain control, activities of daily living, QOL, and patient satisfaction. The median follow-up duration was 16.5 months. Twenty-two patients (42.3%) had complete pain relief, 14 (26.9%) had partial but satisfactory pain relief, and in 16 patients (30.8%) the treatment failed. Seven patients (13.5%) reported a recurrence during the follow-up period, and 25 (48.1%) reported a significant (> 50%) decrease in their pain within the 1st month posttreatment. The mean decrease in the total dose of pain medication was 75%. Patients' self-reported QOL scores improved 90% and the overall patient satisfaction score was 80%. Conclusions The authors found that GKS is a minimally invasive and effective procedure that yields a favorable outcome for patients with recurrent or refractory TN. It may also be offered as a first-line surgical modality for any patients with TN who are unsuited or unwilling to undergo microvascular decompression.

scholarly journals (A178) Evaluating the Feasibility of Verbal Analogue Scale among Emergency Care Providers in Assessment and Management of Acute Pain in Trauma Victims

2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (S1) ◽  
pp. s50-s50
Author(s):  
G. Adhikari ◽  
S. Bhoi ◽  
S. Chauhan ◽  
T.P. Sinha ◽  
P. Gautam
Keyword(s):  
Visual Analogue Scale ◽  
Scale Score ◽  
Acute Pain ◽  
Emergency Care ◽  
Analogue Scale ◽  
Visual Analogue Score ◽  
Likert Scale ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Pain Scales ◽  
Trauma Victims

BackgroundAcute pain assessment and management in trauma victims is often overlooked in emergency department (ED). Visual analogue scale is the preferred scale for assessment and management of pain however, its role in a busy ED is limited. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of verbal and visual analogue scale among emergency care providers.MethodsEmergency caregivers were instructed to use both pain scales wherever feasible for assessment, management, and monitoring of pain in 100 non-consecutive alert patients. A separate, pre-tested survey questionnaire addressing the feasibility of each pain scales was surveyed among emergency care providers (emergency physicians, nursing staff). A Likert scale (1 to 5) was assessed for cooperativeness, availability of time for assessment, the format, the peak period feasibility, the monitoring ease and the amount of work load. Binary scale (yes and no) was used to measure the overall utility in assessment and management of pain.ResultsOut of 100 patients enrolled, the verbal analogue score was used in all patients and visual analogue score was used in 30 patients. The average Likert scale score for verbal analogue score questionnaire was 1.7 and the average Likert scale score for visual analogue score questionnaire was 3.9. On the overall utility both scales were found to be useful in all patients.ConclusionsBoth the scales were found to be useful in overall assessment and management of pain. However, there was a favorable trend towards using verbal analogue scale among emergency care providers.

Comparison of the PainMatcher and the Visual Analogue Scale for assessment of labour pain following administered pain relief treatment

Midwifery ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. e134-e139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingrid H.E. Bergh ◽  
Elisabet Stener-Victorin ◽  
Gunnar Wallin ◽  
Lena Mårtensson
Keyword(s):  
Pain Relief ◽  
Visual Analogue Scale ◽  
Analogue Scale ◽  
Labour Pain

Gag Reflex Control through Acupuncture: A Case Series

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppa Bilello ◽  
Antonella Fregapane
Keyword(s):  
Chinese Medicine ◽  
Traditional Chinese Medicine ◽  
Visual Analogue Scale ◽  
Analogue Scale ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
History Of ◽  
Gag Reflex ◽  
Reflex Control ◽  
Dental Appointments

Background Many patients avoid dental appointments because of severe gagging when they have work performed, such as taking impressions. There are several methods known to alleviate gagging, and some studies have suggested that acupuncture may be effective in reducing gag reflex. The aim of the present study therefore was to evaluate whether acupuncture can produce a reduction of the gag reflex. Methods A total of 20 patients, aged between 19 and 80 years, with history of gag reflex on taking dental impressions, were recruited. All patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria had an upper and lower dental alginate impression taken without acupuncture, and a second upper and lower alginate impression taken immediately after acupuncture based on traditional Chinese medicine. After each impression, the patients recorded their emetic sensation using a visual analogue scale (VAS). Results The results showed a significant (p<0.05) reduction in the gag reflex scores after acupuncture. For upper impressions, they fell from 6.8 (1.1) to 1.1 (1.1); and for lower impressions, from 5.45 (1.0) to 0.4 (0.7) (mean (SD)). Conclusions The findings from our study suggest that acupuncture may be useful for preventing and treating gag reflex, and justifies further study.

scholarly journals The Effectiveness of the Amount of Polymethylmethacrylate In The Treatment of Osteoporotic Compression Fracture of The Lumbar Vertebrae

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehmet Onur Yüksel ◽  
Serdar Çevik ◽  
Barış Erdoğan ◽  
Salim Katar ◽  
Tamer Tunçkale ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Analogue Scale ◽  
Pain Control ◽  
Analogue Scale ◽  
Percutaneous Vertebroplasty ◽  
Lumbar Vertebrae ◽  
Compression Fracture ◽  
Lumbar Vertebra ◽  
Vertebral Height ◽  
Osteoporotic Compression Fracture ◽  
The Mean

Objective: We aimed to investigate the effectiveness of the amount of polymethylmethacrylate used in pain control and maintenance of long-term vertebra corpus height in patients undergoing percutaneous vertebroplasty due to osteoporotic compression fracture of the lumbar vertebra. Method: A total of 60 patients who underwent unilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty between 2014 and 2019 due to osteoporotic compression fracture of the lumbar vertebrae were included in the study. Patients who received 5 ml and 3 ml cement injection were retrospectively analyzed. Of patients, postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score and anterior vertebral height of the patients at 1st-year control were evaluated. Results: In the postoperative period, the mean visual analogue scale score was 2.3±0.46 in the 5 ml injected group and 2.2±0.4 in the 3 ml injected group (p5 ml=0.001, p3 ml= 0.001). There was a statistically significant decline in pain control in both groups. The mean anterior vertebral height loss (AVHL) in the 5 ml injected group was 31.5±0.40%, and 32.6±0.47% in the 3 ml injected group (p5 ml=0.820, p3ml= 0.870). There was no statistically significant alteration in both groups. Conclusion: Our results indicate that the 3 ml polymethylmethacrylate injection during the percutaneous vertebroplasty procedure provides adequate pain control and stabilization in patients with lumbar vertebral osteoporotic fracture. Therefore we think that small amount of polymethylmethacrylate (3 ml) is sufficient to avoid undesirable complications in this patient group.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document