scholarly journals Local Resilience for Squares of Almost Spanning Cycles in Sparse Random Graphs

10.37236/6281 ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Noever ◽  
Angelika Steger
Keyword(s):  
Random Graph ◽  
Random Graphs ◽  
Hamiltonian Cycle ◽  
Blow Up ◽  
Minimum Degree ◽  
Single Vertex ◽  
Long Cycle ◽  
Local Resilience ◽  
Delta G ◽  
Spanning Cycles

In 1962, Pósa conjectured that a graph $G=(V, E)$ contains a square of a Hamiltonian cycle if $\delta(G)\ge 2n/3$. Only more than thirty years later Komlós, Sárkőzy, and Szemerédi proved this conjecture using the so-called Blow-Up Lemma. Here we extend their result to a random graph setting. We show that for every $\epsilon > 0$ and $p=n^{-1/2+\epsilon}$ a.a.s. every subgraph of $G_{n,p}$ with minimum degree at least $(2/3+\epsilon)np$ contains the square of a cycle on $(1-o(1))n$ vertices. This is almost best possible in three ways: (1) for $p\ll n^{-1/2}$ the random graph will not contain any square of a long cycle (2) one cannot hope for a resilience version for the square of a spanning cycle (as deleting all edges in the neighborhood of single vertex destroys this property) and (3) for $c<2/3$ a.a.s. $G_{n,p}$ contains a subgraph with minimum degree at least $cnp$ which does not contain the square of a path on $(1/3+c)n$ vertices.

scholarly journals On Komlós’ tiling theorem in random graphs

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 113-127
Author(s):  
Rajko Nenadov ◽  
Nemanja Škorić
Keyword(s):  
Chromatic Number ◽  
Random Graph ◽  
Random Graphs ◽  
Upper Bound ◽  
Minimum Degree ◽  
Arbitrary Graph ◽  
Spanning Subgraph ◽  
Delta G ◽  
Image Position ◽  
Vertex Disjoint

AbstractGiven graphs G and H, a family of vertex-disjoint copies of H in G is called an H-tiling. Conlon, Gowers, Samotij and Schacht showed that for a given graph H and a constant γ>0, there exists C>0 such that if $p \ge C{n^{ - 1/{m_2}(H)}}$ , then asymptotically almost surely every spanning subgraph G of the random graph 𝒢(n, p) with minimum degree at least $\delta (G) \ge (1 - \frac{1}{{{\chi _{{\rm{cr}}}}(H)}} + \gamma )np$ contains an H-tiling that covers all but at most γn vertices. Here, χcr(H) denotes the critical chromatic number, a parameter introduced by Komlós, and m2(H) is the 2-density of H. We show that this theorem can be bootstrapped to obtain an H-tiling covering all but at most $\gamma {(C/p)^{{m_2}(H)}}$ vertices, which is strictly smaller when $p \ge C{n^{ - 1/{m_2}(H)}}$ . In the case where H = K3, this answers the question of Balogh, Lee and Samotij. Furthermore, for an arbitrary graph H we give an upper bound on p for which some leftover is unavoidable and a bound on the size of a largest H -tiling for p below this value.

scholarly journals The Bandwidth Theorem in sparse graphs

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Allen ◽  
Julia Böttcher ◽  
Julia Ehrenmüller ◽  
Anusch Taraz
Keyword(s):  
Hamiltonian Cycle ◽  
Blow Up ◽  
Minimum Degree ◽  
Main Tool ◽  
Sparse Graphs ◽  
Spanning Subgraphs ◽  
Dense Graphs ◽  
Vertex Graph ◽  
First Results ◽  
Delta G

One of the first results in graph theory was Dirac's theorem which claims that if the minimum degree in a graph is at least half of the number of vertices, then it contains a Hamiltonian cycle. This result has inspired countless other results all stating that in dense graphs we can find sparse spanning subgraphs. Along these lines, one of the most far-reaching results is the celebrated _Bandwidth Theorem_, proved around 10 years ago by Böttcher, Schacht, and Taraz. It states, rougly speaking, that every $n$-vertex graph with minimum degree at least $\left( \frac{r-1}{r} + o(1)\right) n$ contains a copy of all $n$-vertex graphs $H$ such that $\chi(H) \leq r$, $\Delta (H) = O(1)$, and the bandwidth of $H$ is $o(n)$. This was conjectured earlier by Bollobás and Komlós. The proof is using the Regularity method based on the Regularity Lemma and the Blow-up Lemma. Ever since the Bandwith Theorem came out, it has been open whether one could prove a similar statement for sparse random graphs. In this remarkable, deep paper the authors do just that, they establish sparse random analogues of the Bandwidth Theorem. In particular, the authors show that, for every positive integer $\Delta$, if $p \gg \left(\frac{\log{n}}{n}\right)^{1/\Delta}$, then asymptotically almost surely, every subgraph $G\subseteq G(n, p)$ with $\delta(G) \geq \left( \frac{r-1}{r} + o(1)\right) np$ contains a copy of every $r$-colourable spanning (i.e., $n$-vertex) graph $H$ with maximum degree at most $\Delta$ and bandwidth $o(n)$, provided that $H$ contains at least $C p^{-2}$ vertices that do not lie on a triangle (of $H$). (The requirement about vertices not lying on triangles is necessary, as pointed out by Huang, Lee, and Sudakov.) The main tool used in the proof is the recent monumental sparse Blow-up Lemma due to Allen, Böttcher, Hàn, Kohayakawa, and Person.

scholarly journals A spanning bandwidth theorem in random graphs

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-31
Author(s):  
Peter Allen ◽  
Julia Böttcher ◽  
Julia Ehrenmüller ◽  
Jakob Schnitzer ◽  
Anusch Taraz
Keyword(s):  
Random Graph ◽  
Random Graphs ◽  
Maximum Degree ◽  
Minimum Degree ◽  
Spanning Subgraph ◽  
Vertex Graph ◽  
Special Case

Abstract The bandwidth theorem of Böttcher, Schacht and Taraz states that any n-vertex graph G with minimum degree $\big(\tfrac{k-1}{k}+o(1)\big)n$ contains all n-vertex k-colourable graphs H with bounded maximum degree and bandwidth o(n). Recently, a subset of the authors proved a random graph analogue of this statement: for $p\gg \big(\tfrac{\log n}{n}\big)^{1/\Delta}$ a.a.s. each spanning subgraph G of G(n,p) with minimum degree $\big(\tfrac{k-1}{k}+o(1)\big)pn$ contains all n-vertex k-colourable graphs H with maximum degree $\Delta$ , bandwidth o(n), and at least $C p^{-2}$ vertices not contained in any triangle. This restriction on vertices in triangles is necessary, but limiting. In this paper, we consider how it can be avoided. A special case of our main result is that, under the same conditions, if additionally all vertex neighbourhoods in G contain many copies of $K_\Delta$ then we can drop the restriction on H that $Cp^{-2}$ vertices should not be in triangles.

scholarly journals Triangle-Free Subgraphs of Random Graphs

2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 141-161
Author(s):  
PETER ALLEN ◽  
JULIA BÖTTCHER ◽  
YOSHIHARU KOHAYAKAWA ◽  
BARNABY ROBERTS
Keyword(s):  
Graph Theory ◽  
Random Graph ◽  
Random Graphs ◽  
Minimum Degree ◽  
Discrete Math ◽  
Constant Factor ◽  
Extremal Graph ◽  
Extremal Graph Theory ◽  
Spanning Subgraph

Recently there has been much interest in studying random graph analogues of well-known classical results in extremal graph theory. Here we follow this trend and investigate the structure of triangle-free subgraphs of G(n, p) with high minimum degree. We prove that asymptotically almost surely each triangle-free spanning subgraph of G(n, p) with minimum degree at least (2/5 + o(1))pn is (p−1n)-close to bipartite, and each spanning triangle-free subgraph of G(n, p) with minimum degree at least (1/3 + ϵ)pn is O(p−1n)-close to r-partite for some r = r(ϵ). These are random graph analogues of a result by Andrásfai, Erdős and Sós (Discrete Math.8 (1974), 205–218), and a result by Thomassen (Combinatorica22 (2002), 591–596). We also show that our results are best possible up to a constant factor.

scholarly journals The bandwidth theorem for locally dense graphs

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine Staden ◽  
Andrew Treglown
Keyword(s):  
Maximum Degree ◽  
Blow Up ◽  
Minimum Degree ◽  
Bounded Degree ◽  
Dense Graphs ◽  
Vertex Graph ◽  
Delta G

Abstract The bandwidth theorem of Böttcher, Schacht, and Taraz [Proof of the bandwidth conjecture of Bollobás andKomlós, Mathematische Annalen, 2009] gives a condition on the minimum degree of an n-vertex graph G that ensures G contains every r-chromatic graph H on n vertices of bounded degree and of bandwidth $o(n)$ , thereby proving a conjecture of Bollobás and Komlós [The Blow-up Lemma, Combinatorics, Probability, and Computing, 1999]. In this paper, we prove a version of the bandwidth theorem for locally dense graphs. Indeed, we prove that every locally dense n-vertex graph G with $\delta (G)> (1/2+o(1))n$ contains as a subgraph any given (spanning) H with bounded maximum degree and sublinear bandwidth.

scholarly journals Random Graph's Hamiltonicity is Strongly Tied to its Minimum Degree

10.37236/8339 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yahav Alon ◽  
Michael Krivelevich
Keyword(s):  
Random Graph ◽  
Analogous Result ◽  
Minimum Degree ◽  
Hamilton Cycle ◽  
Perfect Matchings ◽  
Delta G

We show that the probability that a random graph $G\sim G(n,p)$ contains no Hamilton cycle is $(1+o(1))Pr(\delta (G) < 2)$ for all values of $p = p(n)$. We also prove an analogous result for perfect matchings.

scholarly journals Ore-degree threshold for the square of a Hamiltonian cycle

2015 ◽  
Vol Vol. 17 no. 1 (Graph Theory) ◽  
Author(s):  
Louis DeBiasio ◽  
Safi Faizullah ◽  
Imdadullah Khan
Keyword(s):  
Graph Theory ◽  
Hamiltonian Cycle ◽  
Blow Up ◽  
Minimum Degree ◽  
Independent Interest ◽  
Regularity Lemma ◽  
Degree Condition ◽  
International Audience ◽  
Classic Theorem

Graph Theory International audience A classic theorem of Dirac from 1952 states that every graph with minimum degree at least n=2 contains a Hamiltonian cycle. In 1963, P´osa conjectured that every graph with minimum degree at least 2n=3 contains the square of a Hamiltonian cycle. In 1960, Ore relaxed the degree condition in the Dirac’s theorem by proving that every graph with deg(u) + deg(v) ≥ n for every uv =2 E(G) contains a Hamiltonian cycle. Recently, Chˆau proved an Ore-type version of P´osa’s conjecture for graphs on n ≥ n0 vertices using the regularity–blow-up method; consequently the n0 is very large (involving a tower function). Here we present another proof that avoids the use of the regularity lemma. Aside from the fact that our proof holds for much smaller n0, we believe that our method of proof will be of independent interest.

scholarly journals Partitioning Random Graphs into Monochromatic Components

10.37236/6089 ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Deepak Bal ◽  
Louis DeBiasio
Keyword(s):  
Random Graph ◽  
Random Graphs ◽  
Complete Graph ◽  
Minimum Degree ◽  
Partial Result ◽  
Complete Graphs ◽  
Number Of Components ◽  
Classic Result ◽  
Bounded Number

Erdős, Gyárfás, and Pyber (1991) conjectured that every $r$-colored complete graph can be partitioned into at most $r-1$ monochromatic components; this is a strengthening of a conjecture of Lovász (1975) and Ryser (1970) in which the components are only required to form a cover. An important partial result of Haxell and Kohayakawa (1995) shows that a partition into $r$ monochromatic components is possible for sufficiently large $r$-colored complete graphs.We start by extending Haxell and Kohayakawa's result to graphs with large minimum degree, then we provide some partial analogs of their result for random graphs. In particular, we show that if $p\ge \left(\frac{27\log n}{n}\right)^{1/3}$, then a.a.s. in every $2$-coloring of $G(n,p)$ there exists a partition into two monochromatic components, and for $r\geq 2$ if $p\ll \left(\frac{r\log n}{n}\right)^{1/r}$, then a.a.s. there exists an $r$-coloring of $G(n,p)$ such that there does not exist a cover with a bounded number of components. Finally, we consider a random graph version of a classic result of Gyárfás (1977) about large monochromatic components in $r$-colored complete graphs. We show that if $p=\frac{\omega(1)}{n}$, then a.a.s. in every $r$-coloring of $G(n,p)$ there exists a monochromatic component of order at least $(1-o(1))\frac{n}{r-1}$.

Random graphs

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Newman
Keyword(s):  
Random Graph ◽  
Random Graphs ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Random Network ◽  
Graph Model ◽  
Clustering Coefficient ◽  
Giant Component ◽  
Random Graph Model ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Average Size

An introduction to the mathematics of the Poisson random graph, the simplest model of a random network. The chapter starts with a definition of the model, followed by derivations of basic properties like the mean degree, degree distribution, and clustering coefficient. This is followed with a detailed derivation of the large-scale structural properties of random graphs, including the position of the phase transition at which a giant component appears, the size of the giant component, the average size of the small components, and the expected diameter of the network. The chapter ends with a discussion of some of the shortcomings of the random graph model.

scholarly journals A New Bound on the Domination Number of Graphs with Minimum Degree Two

10.37236/499 ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael A. Henning ◽  
Ingo Schiermeyer ◽  
Anders Yeo
Keyword(s):  
Connected Graph ◽  
Minimum Degree ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Degree Condition ◽  
Cut Vertex ◽  
Delta G ◽  
Vertex Disjoint ◽  
Special Cycle

For a graph $G$, let $\gamma(G)$ denote the domination number of $G$ and let $\delta(G)$ denote the minimum degree among the vertices of $G$. A vertex $x$ is called a bad-cut-vertex of $G$ if $G-x$ contains a component, $C_x$, which is an induced $4$-cycle and $x$ is adjacent to at least one but at most three vertices on $C_x$. A cycle $C$ is called a special-cycle if $C$ is a $5$-cycle in $G$ such that if $u$ and $v$ are consecutive vertices on $C$, then at least one of $u$ and $v$ has degree $2$ in $G$. We let ${\rm bc}(G)$ denote the number of bad-cut-vertices in $G$, and ${\rm sc}(G)$ the maximum number of vertex disjoint special-cycles in $G$ that contain no bad-cut-vertices. We say that a graph is $(C_4,C_5)$-free if it has no induced $4$-cycle or $5$-cycle. Bruce Reed [Paths, stars and the number three. Combin. Probab. Comput. 5 (1996), 277–295] showed that if $G$ is a graph of order $n$ with $\delta(G) \ge 3$, then $\gamma(G) \le 3n/8$. In this paper, we relax the minimum degree condition from three to two. Let $G$ be a connected graph of order $n \ge 14$ with $\delta(G) \ge 2$. As an application of Reed's result, we show that $\gamma(G) \le \frac{1}{8} ( 3n + {\rm sc}(G) + {\rm bc}(G))$. As a consequence of this result, we have that (i) $\gamma(G) \le 2n/5$; (ii) if $G$ contains no special-cycle and no bad-cut-vertex, then $\gamma(G) \le 3n/8$; (iii) if $G$ is $(C_4,C_5)$-free, then $\gamma(G) \le 3n/8$; (iv) if $G$ is $2$-connected and $d_G(u) + d_G(v) \ge 5$ for every two adjacent vertices $u$ and $v$, then $\gamma(G) \le 3n/8$. All bounds are sharp.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document