scholarly journals Dominating Sets of Random 2-in 2-out Directed Graphs

10.37236/753 ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Howe

We analyse an algorithm for finding small dominating sets of $2$-in $2$-out directed graphs using a deprioritised algorithm and differential equations. This deprioritised approach determines an a.a.s. upper bound of $0.39856n$ on the size of the smallest dominating set of a random $2$-in $2$-out digraph on $n$ vertices. Direct expectation arguments determine a corresponding lower bound of $0.3495n$.

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (06) ◽  
pp. 1950065
Author(s):  
Xianliang Liu ◽  
Zishen Yang ◽  
Wei Wang

As a variant of minimum connected dominating set problem, two disjoint connected dominating sets (DCDS) problem is to ask whether there are two DCDS [Formula: see text] in a connected graph [Formula: see text] with [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text], and if not, how to add an edge subset with minimum cardinality such that the new graph has a pair of DCDS. The two DCDS problem is so hard that it is NP-hard on trees. In this paper, if the vertex set [Formula: see text] of a connected graph [Formula: see text] can be partitioned into two DCDS of [Formula: see text], then it is called a DCDS graph. First, a necessary but not sufficient condition is proposed for cubic (3-regular) graph to be a DCDS graph. To be exact, if a cubic graph is a DCDS graph, there are at most four disjoint triangles in it. Next, if a connected graph [Formula: see text] is a DCDS graph, a simple but nontrivial upper bound [Formula: see text] of the girth [Formula: see text] is presented.


2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-64
Author(s):  
José Cáceres ◽  
Carmen Hernando ◽  
Mercè Mora ◽  
Ignacio Pelayo ◽  
María Puertas

A k??quasiperfect dominating set of a connected graph G is a vertex subset S such that every vertex not in S is adjacent to at least one and at most k vertices in S. The cardinality of a minimum k-quasiperfect dominating set in G is denoted by ?1k(G). These graph parameters were first introduced by Chellali et al. (2013) as a generalization of both the perfect domination number ?11(G) and the domination number ?(G). The study of the so-called quasiperfect domination chain ?11(G) ? ?12(G)?... ? ?1?(G) = ?(G) enable us to analyze how far minimum dominating sets are from being perfect. In this paper, we provide, for any tree T and any positive integer k, a tight upper bound of ?1k(T). We also prove that there are trees satisfying all possible equalities and inequalities in this chain. Finally a linear algorithm for computing ?1k(T) in any tree T is presented.


1999 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 547-553 ◽  
Author(s):  
JOCHEN HARANT ◽  
ANJA PRUCHNEWSKI ◽  
MARGIT VOIGT

For a graph G on vertex set V = {1, …, n} let k = (k1, …, kn) be an integral vector such that 1 [les ] ki [les ] di for i ∈ V, where di is the degree of the vertex i in G. A k-dominating set is a set Dk ⊆ V such that every vertex i ∈ V[setmn ]Dk has at least ki neighbours in Dk. The k-domination number γk(G) of G is the cardinality of a smallest k-dominating set of G.For k1 = · · · = kn = 1, k-domination corresponds to the usual concept of domination. Our approach yields an improvement of an upper bound for the domination number found by N. Alon and J. H. Spencer.If ki = di for i = 1, …, n, then the notion of k-dominating set corresponds to the complement of an independent set. A function fk(p) is defined, and it will be proved that γk(G) = min fk(p), where the minimum is taken over the n-dimensional cube Cn = {p = (p1, …, pn) [mid ] pi ∈ ℝ, 0 [les ] pi [les ] 1, i = 1, …, n}. An [Oscr ](Δ22Δn-algorithm is presented, where Δ is the maximum degree of G, with INPUT: p ∈ Cn and OUTPUT: a k-dominating set Dk of G with [mid ]Dk[mid ][les ]fk(p).


2011 ◽  
Vol 61 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lutz Volkmann

AbstractLet k be a positive integer, and let G be a simple graph with vertex set V (G). A vertex of a graph G dominates itself and all vertices adjacent to it. A subset S ⊆ V (G) is a k-tuple dominating set of G if each vertex of V (G) is dominated by at least k vertices in S. The k-tuple domatic number of G is the largest number of sets in a partition of V (G) into k-tuple dominating sets.In this paper, we present a lower bound on the k-tuple domatic number, and we establish Nordhaus-Gaddum inequalities. Some of our results extends those for the classical domatic number.


Filomat ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 699-710 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li-Dan Pei ◽  
Xiang-Feng Pan ◽  
Jing Tian ◽  
Gui-Qin Peng

The eccentricity of a vertex is the maximal distance from it to another vertex and the average eccentricity ecc(G) of a graph G is the mean value of eccentricities of all vertices of G. A set S ? V(G) is a dominating set of a graph G if NG(v) ? S ? 0 for any vertex v ? V(G)\S. The domination number (G) of G is the minimum cardinality of all dominating sets of G. In this paper, we correct an AutoGraphiX conjecture regarding the domination number and average eccentricity, and present a proof of the revised conjecture. In addition, we establish an upper bound on ?(T)-ecc(T) for an n-vertex tree T.


10.37236/6026 ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sándor Bozóki ◽  
Péter Gál ◽  
István Marosi ◽  
William D. Weakley

The queens graph $Q_{m \times n}$ has the squares of the $m \times n$ chessboard as its vertices; two squares are adjacent if they are in the same row, column, or diagonal of the board. A set $D$ of squares of $Q_{m \times n}$ is a dominating set for $Q_{m \times n}$ if every square of $Q_{m \times n}$ is either in $D$ or adjacent to a square in $D$. The minimum size of a dominating set of $Q_{m \times n}$ is the domination number, denoted by $\gamma(Q_{m \times n})$. Values of $\gamma(Q_{m \times n}), \, 4 \leq m \leq n \leq 18,\,$ are given here, in each case with a file of minimum dominating sets (often all of them, up to symmetry) in an online appendix. In these ranges for $m$ and $n$, monotonicity fails once: $\gamma(Q_{8\times 11}) = 6 > 5 = \gamma(Q_{9 \times 11}) = \gamma(Q_{10 \times 11}) = \gamma(Q_{11 \times 11})$. Let $g(m)$ [respectively $g^{*}(m)$] be the largest integer such that $m$ queens suffice to dominate the $(m+1) \times g(m)$ board [respectively, to dominate the $(m+1) \times g^{*}(m)$ board with no two queens in a row]. Starting from the elementary bound $g(m) \leq 3m$, domination when the board is far from square is investigated. It is shown (Theorem 2) that $g(m) = 3m$ can only occur when $m \equiv 0, 1, 2, 3, \mbox{or } 4 \mbox{ (mod 9)}$, with an online appendix showing that this does occur for $m \leq 40, m \neq 3$. Also (Theorem 4), if $m \equiv 5, 6, \mbox{or } 7 \mbox{ (mod 9)}$ then $g^{*}(m) \leq 3m-2$, and if $m \equiv 8 \mbox{ (mod 9)}$ then $g^{*}(m) \leq 3m-4$. It is shown that equality holds in these bounds for $m \leq 40 $. Lower bounds on $\gamma(Q_{m \times n})$ are given. In particular, if $m \leq n$ then $\gamma(Q_{m \times n}) \geq \min \{ m,\lceil (m+n-2)/4 \rceil \}$. Two types of dominating sets (orthodox covers and centrally strong sets) are developed; each type is shown to give good upper bounds of $\gamma(Q_{m \times n})$ in several cases. Three questions are posed: whether monotonicity of $\gamma(Q_{m \times n})$ holds (other than from $(m, n) = (8, 11)$ to $(9, 11)$), whether $\gamma(Q_{m \times n}) = (m+n-2)/4$ occurs with $m \leq n < 3m+2$ (other than for $(m, n) = (3, 3)$ and $(11, 11)$), and whether the lower bound given above can be improved. A set of squares is independent if no two of its squares are adjacent. The minimum size of an independent dominating set of $Q_{m \times n}$ is the independent domination number, denoted by $i(Q_{m \times n})$. Values of $i(Q_{m \times n}), \, 4 \leq m \leq n \leq 18, \,$ are given here, in each case with some minimum dominating sets. In these ranges for $m$ and $n$, monotonicity fails twice: $i(Q_{8\times 11}) = 6 > 5 = i(Q_{9 \times 11}) = i(Q_{10 \times 11}) = i(Q_{11 \times 11})$, and $i(Q_{11 \times 18}) = 9 > 8 = i(Q_{12\times 18})$.


10.37236/1624 ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Duckworth

We present a simple heuristic for finding a small connected dominating set of cubic graphs. The average-case performance of this heuristic, which is a randomised greedy algorithm, is analysed on random $n$-vertex cubic graphs using differential equations. In this way, we prove that the expected size of the connected dominating set returned by the algorithm is asymptotically almost surely less than $0.5854n$.


10.37236/5180 ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dieter Mitsche ◽  
Xavier Pérez-Giménez ◽  
Paweł Prałat

A dominating set of a graph is a subset $D$ of its vertices such that every vertex not in $D$ is adjacent to at least one member of $D$. The domination number of a graph $G$ is the number of vertices in a smallest dominating set of $G$. The bondage number of a nonempty graph $G$ is the size of a smallest set of edges whose removal from $G$ results in a graph with domination number greater than the domination number of $G$. In this note, we study the bondage number of the binomial random graph $G(n,p)$. We obtain a lower bound that matches the order of the trivial upper bound. As a side product, we give a one-point concentration result for the domination number of $G(n,p)$ under certain restrictions.


2019 ◽  
Vol 485 (2) ◽  
pp. 142-144
Author(s):  
A. A. Zevin

Solutions x(t) of the Lipschitz equation x = f(x) with an arbitrary vector norm are considered. It is proved that the sharp lower bound for the distances between successive extremums of xk(t) equals π/L where L is the Lipschitz constant. For non-constant periodic solutions, the lower bound for the periods is 2π/L. These estimates are achieved for norms that are invariant with respect to permutation of the indices.


1998 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shiqing Zhang

Using the equivariant Ljusternik-Schnirelmann theory and the estimate of the upper bound of the critical value and lower bound for the collision solutions, we obtain some new results in the large concerning multiple geometrically distinct periodic solutions of fixed energy for a class of planar N-body type problems.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document