GAS HYDRATE SATURATION ESTIMATED FROM ACOUSTIC IMPEDANCE IN THE ANDAMAN SEA, INDIA

2014 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 163-168
Author(s):  
Xiujuan WANG ◽  
Jiliang WANG ◽  
Wei LI ◽  
Nittala Satyavani ◽  
Kalachand Sain
2011 ◽  
Vol 28 (9) ◽  
pp. 1625-1633 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiujuan Wang ◽  
Shiguo Wu ◽  
Myung Lee ◽  
Yiqun Guo ◽  
Shengxiong Yang ◽  
...  

Energies ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 804
Author(s):  
Lin Liu ◽  
Xiumei Zhang ◽  
Xiuming Wang

Natural gas hydrate is a new clean energy source in the 21st century, which has become a research point of the exploration and development technology. Acoustic well logs are one of the most important assets in gas hydrate studies. In this paper, an improved Carcione–Leclaire model is proposed by introducing the expressions of frame bulk modulus, shear modulus and friction coefficient between solid phases. On this basis, the sensitivities of the velocities and attenuations of the first kind of compressional (P1) and shear (S1) waves to relevant physical parameters are explored. In particular, we perform numerical modeling to investigate the effects of frequency, gas hydrate saturation and clay on the phase velocities and attenuations of the above five waves. The analyses demonstrate that, the velocities and attenuations of P1 and S1 are more sensitive to gas hydrate saturation than other parameters. The larger the gas hydrate saturation, the more reliable P1 velocity. Besides, the attenuations of P1 and S1 are more sensitive than velocity to gas hydrate saturation. Further, P1 and S1 are almost nondispersive while their phase velocities increase with the increase of gas hydrate saturation. The second compressional (P2) and shear (S2) waves and the third kind of compressional wave (P3) are dispersive in the seismic band, and the attenuations of them are significant. Moreover, in the case of clay in the solid grain frame, gas hydrate-bearing sediments exhibit lower P1 and S1 velocities. Clay decreases the attenuation of P1, and the attenuations of S1, P2, S2 and P3 exhibit little effect on clay content. We compared the velocity of P1 predicted by the model with the well log data from the Ocean Drilling Program (ODP) Leg 164 Site 995B to verify the applicability of the model. The results of the model agree well with the well log data. Finally, we estimate the hydrate layer at ODP Leg 204 Site 1247B is about 100–130 m below the seafloor, the saturation is between 0–27%, and the average saturation is 7.2%.


Author(s):  
Xiujuan Wang ◽  
Deborah R. Hutchinson ◽  
Shiguo Wu ◽  
Shengxiong Yang ◽  
Yiqun Guo

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-42
Author(s):  
Maheswar Ojha ◽  
Ranjana Ghosh

The Indian National Gas Hydrate Program Expedition-01 in 2006 has discovered gas hydrate in Mahanadi offshore basin along the eastern Indian margin. However, well log analysis, pressure core measurements and Infra-Red (IR) anomalies reveal that gas hydrates are distributed as disseminated within the fine-grained sediment, unlike massive gas hydrate deposits in the Krishna-Godavari basin. 2D multi-channel seismic section, which crosses the Holes NGHP-01-9A and 19B located at about 24 km apart shows a continuous bottom-simulating reflector (BSR) along it. We aim to investigate the prospect of gas hydrate accumulation in this area by integrating well log analysis and seismic methods with rock physics modeling. First, we estimate gas hydrate saturation at these two Holes from the observed impedance using the three-phase Biot-type equation (TPBE). Then we establish a linear relationship between gas hydrate saturation and impedance contrast with respect to the water-saturated sediment. Using this established relation and impedance obtained from pre-stack inversion of seismic data, we produce a 2D gas hydrate-distribution image over the entire seismic section. Gas hydrate saturation estimated from resistivity and sonic data at well locations varies within 0-15%, which agrees well with the available pressure core measurements at Hole 19. However, the 2D map of gas hydrate distribution obtained from our method shows maximum gas hydrate saturation is about 40% just above the BSR between the CDP (common depth point) 1450 and 2850. The presence of gas-charged sediments below the BSR is one of the reasons for the strong BSR observed in the seismic section, which is depicted as low impedance in the inverted impedance section. Closed sedimentary structures above the BSR are probably obstructing the movements of free-gas upslope, for which we do not see the presence of gas hydrate throughout the seismic section above the BSR.


2020 ◽  
Vol 113 ◽  
pp. 104166
Author(s):  
Haojie Pan ◽  
Hongbing Li ◽  
Jingyi Chen ◽  
Michael Riedel ◽  
Melanie Holland ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document