scholarly journals Performance of a Robust Confidence Interval for the Process Capability Index Cp based on the Modified Trimmed Standard Deviation Under Non-Normal Distributions

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  

In this paper, a robust interval estimator for the classical process capability index (Cp) based on the modified trimmed standard deviation (MTSD = ST ∗ ) is considered under both normal and non-normal distributions. The performance of the newly proposed process capability index interval estimator over the existing method is compared using a simulation study. As a performance criterion, we consider both simulated coverage probability and average width. Simulation results evident that the proposed confidence interval based on the robust estimator performed well for most of cases. For illustration purposes, two real-life data from industry are analyzed which supported our simulation results to some extent. As a result, the proposed method can be recommend to be used by the practitioners in various fields of industry, engineering and physical sciences.

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 639
Author(s):  
Pablo José Moya Fernández ◽  
Juan Francisco Muñoz Rosas ◽  
Encarnación Álvarez Verdejo

The process capability index (PCI) evaluates the ability of a process to produce items with certain quality requirements. The PCI depends on the process standard deviation, which is usually unknown and estimated by using the sample standard deviation. The construction of confidence intervals for the PCI is also an important topic. The usual estimator of the PCI and its corresponding confidence interval are based on various assumptions, such as normality, the fact that the process is under control, or samples selected from infinite populations. The main aim of this paper is to investigate the empirical properties of estimators of the PCI, and analyze numerically the effect on confidence intervals when such assumptions are not satisfied, since these situations may arise in practice.


2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wararit Panichkitkosolkul

This paper proposes a confidence interval for the process capability index based on the bootstrap-t confidence interval for the standard deviation. A Monte Carlo simulation study was conducted to compare the performance of the proposed confidence interval with the existing confidence interval based on the confidence interval for the standard deviation. Simulation results show that the proposed confidence interval performs well in terms of coverage probability in case of more skewed distributions. On the other hand, the existing confidence interval has a coverage probability close to the nominal level for symmetrical or less skewed distributions. The code to estimate the confidence interval in R language is provided.


2013 ◽  
Vol 404 ◽  
pp. 520-525 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shu Fei Wu

The process capability index which is a generalization of is defined by the use of the idea of Chan et al. [ for asymmetric tolerance. In this paper, we proposed a Jackknife confidence interval for and compare its coverage probability with the other three Efron and Tibshiranis [ bootstrap interval estimate techniques. The simulation results show that the Jackknife method has higher chance of reaching the nominal confidence coefficient for all cases considered in this paper. Therefore this method is recommended for used. One numerical example to demonstrate the construction of confidence interval for the process capability index is also given in this paper.


Symmetry ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 484 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gadde Srinivasa Rao ◽  
Mohammed Albassam ◽  
Muhammad Aslam

This paper assesses the bootstrap confidence intervals of a newly proposed process capability index (PCI) for Weibull distribution, using the logarithm of the analyzed data. These methods can be applied when the quality of interest has non-symmetrical distribution. Bootstrap confidence intervals, which consist of standard bootstrap (SB), percentile bootstrap (PB), and bias-corrected percentile bootstrap (BCPB) confidence interval are constructed for the proposed method. A Monte Carlo simulation study is used to determine the efficiency of newly proposed index Cpkw over the existing method by addressing the coverage probabilities and average widths. The outcome shows that the BCPB confidence interval is recommended. The methodology of the proposed index has been explained by using the real data of breaking stress of carbon fibers.


Author(s):  
Mou-Yuan Liao ◽  
WL Pearn

The process capability index has become an efficient tool for measuring a supplier’s process performance. [Formula: see text] is one popularly used index for assessing non-normal process capability when the process violates the normality assumption. Unfortunately, this index cannot accurately reflect the process yield, so it may produce a serious result if the practitioner compares the calculated [Formula: see text] value with the capability requirement to determine whether the process meets that requirement. Hence, this study modifies [Formula: see text] to provide an adequate measure of lognormal process capability. In addition, an estimator of this modified index is also provided. Simulations show that the bias of this estimator is slight, and the coverage probability of capability testing is close to the nominal confidence. This means that our proposed method is adaptable for use.


2014 ◽  
Vol 1039 ◽  
pp. 622-626
Author(s):  
Zai Fang Zhang ◽  
Xiao Song Wu ◽  
Rui Miao ◽  
Bei Xin Xia

Process capability index (PCI) has been widely applied in manufacturing industry as an effective management tool for quality evaluation and improvement, whose calculation in most existing research work is premised on the assumption that there exists no bias. In this paper, the bias of gauge which exerts an effect on the calculation of PCI is indicated inevitable. The influence on PCI caused by the bias is analyzed by constructing a comparative ratio R between the empirical process capability index and the PCI. A confidence interval estimation method is proposed to solve the underestimation problem of PCI.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document