scholarly journals Analysis of Fraud Pentagon Theory to Detecting Fraudulent Financial Reporting using F-Score Model in State-Owned Companies Indonesia

2022 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
pp. 124-133
Author(s):  
Tarmizi Achmad ◽  
Dian Indriana Hapsari ◽  
Imang Dapit Pamungkas
Keyword(s):  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
External Pressure ◽  
Annual Reports ◽  
Fraudulent Financial Reporting ◽  
Analysis Technique ◽  
Considerable Impact ◽  
Score Model

This study aims to analyze the effect of the fraud pentagon theory consisting of external pressure, effective monitoring, rationalization, capability, and arrogance on fraudulent financial reporting. This study uses the F-score model to see the potential for fraudulent financial reporting. The data used in this study are secondary data from the company's annual reports. The population of this research is state-owned companies listed on the IDX (Indonesia Stock Exchange) during 2015-2019. The sampling technique used purposive sampling so that the sample obtained is 180 samples. The analysis technique used is logistic regression analysis with S.P.S.S. versions 20.0. The findings show that external pressure and rationalization have a significant effect on fraudulent financial reporting. Meanwhile, effective monitoring, capability, and arrogance have no considerable impact on fraudulent financial reporting. The results of this study indicate the occurrence of fraudulent financial reporting in state-owned companies listed on the IDX if the related state-owned companies experience external pressure and have rationalizations to commit fraud.

scholarly journals ANALISIS PENGARUH FRAUD PENTAGON DALAM MENDETEKSI FRAUDULENT FINANCIAL REPORTING PADA PERUSAHAAN JASA NONKEUANGAN

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 104-124
Author(s):  
Yuliamos Tirta Wijaya Pasaribu ◽  
Synthia Madya Kusumawati ◽  
L. Jade Faliany
Keyword(s):  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Financial Stability ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Financial Statements ◽  
External Pressure ◽  
Annual Reports ◽  
Fraudulent Financial Reporting ◽  
Service Companies ◽  
Positive Effect

Abstract– This research aimed at analyzing the effect of fraud pentagon proxied by nine variables, namely financial stability, personal financial needs, external pressure, financial targets, ineffective monitoring, industry characteristics, auditor changes, director changes, and frequent number of CEO’s picture towards fraudulent financial reporting proxied by Beneish M-Score at non-financial service companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) period 2015-2017. The data used were secondary data obtained from annual reports and financial statements of nonfinancial service companies period 2015-2017 with a total of 285 eligible samples. The data analysis methods used were descriptive statistical analysis and logistic regression analysis. The results showed that the variables of financial stability and the nature of the industry generated a significant and positive effect on fraudulent financial reporting. Meanwhile, the variables of personal financial needs, external pressure, financial targets, ineffective monitoring, auditor changes, director changes, and often the CEO's image were not significant to fraudulent financial reporting. Keywords: Fraud Pentagon, Fradulent Financial Reporting, Beneish M-Score

scholarly journals FAKTOR - FAKTOR YANG BERPENGARUH TERHADAP FRAUDULENT FINANCIAL REPORTING DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN ANALISIS FRAUD PENTAGON

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 105
Author(s):  
Hanifah Agusputri ◽  
Sofie Sofie
Keyword(s):  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Financial Stability ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
External Pressure ◽  
Fraudulent Financial Reporting ◽  
Processing Application ◽  
Industrial Manufacture ◽  
Score Model ◽  
Using Data

<p><em>This research aimed to analysis the effect of fraud pentagon, the variable are pressure (financial targets, financial stability and external pressure), opportunity (ineffective monitoring and nature of industry), rationalization (change in auditor and rationalization), competence (change of directors) and arrogance (frequent number of CEO’s picture) to fraudulent financial reporting which measured using F-Score Model. This research used secondary data and purposive sampling method, there were 201 industrial manufacture industries that were registered in Indonesia Stock Exchange in period of 2015-2017 as research sample. This research used logistic regression analysis by using data processing application of SPSS. The result showed that financial target and ineffective monitoring have a positive affect on the  fraudulent financial reporting. Furthermore, external pressure, nature of industry, change in auditor and rationalization have a negative affect on  fraudulent financial reporting. While, financial stability, change in directors and frequent number of CEO’s picture have not affected on  fraudulent financial reporting. </em></p>

scholarly journals Pengaruh Karakteristik Komite Audit, Perusahaan dan Struktur Kepemilikan Terhadap Kecurangan Pelaporan Keuangan

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 50
Author(s):  
Andrian Budi Prasetyo
Keyword(s):  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Audit Committee ◽  
Quantitative Methods ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Annual Reports ◽  
Fraudulent Financial Reporting ◽  
Financial Expertise ◽  
Firm Characteristic

This study examines the effect of audit committee characteristics, firm characteristic and ownership structure on the likelihood of fraudulent financial reporting. Audit committee characteristics is examined by audit committee financial expertise, meetings of the audit committee and the audit committee tenure. Firm characteristic is examined by the leverage, firm size, firm’s growth rate and external auditor. Ownership structure is examined by managerial ownership and institutional ownership. This research is using a quantitative methods research. This research is using secondary data that comes from the cases list of Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK) and annual reports of the listed companies on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX). Using a sample of 15 fraud and 15 non-fraud firms, we did not find a significant relation between the independent variabels and fraudulent financial reporting.

scholarly journals Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Fraudulent Financial Reporting

Akuntabilitas ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 139-152
Author(s):  
Wulanda Maya Sari ◽  
Anik Irawati
Keyword(s):  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Data Analysis ◽  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Financial Stability ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
External Pressure ◽  
Analysis Method ◽  
Fraudulent Financial Reporting ◽  
Spss Software ◽  
Score Model

This study aims to empirically prove the influence of financial stability, external pressure, and ineffective monitoring on fraudulent financial reporting. Financial stability was measured using a comparison of total assets. External pressure was measured using leverage. Meanwhile, ineffective monitoring was measured using the ratio of independent commissioners’ number. The dependent variable in this study was fraudulent financial reporting. It was measured using the F-Score Model. The sample in this study were 21 State Owned Enterprises (BUMN) listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange in period of 2017-2019. The data analysis method used in this study was Logistic Regression using SPSS software version 20. The results of this study indicate that financial stability has no influence on fraudulent financial reporting. Meanwhile, external pressure and ineffective monitoring influence fraudulent financial reporting.How to cite:Sari, W. M., & Irawati, A. (2021). Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Fraudulent Financial Reporting. Akuntabilitas: Jurnal Ilmu Akuntansi, 14(2), 139-152.

scholarly journals FRAUDULENT FINANCIAL REPORTING: A PENTAGON FRAUD ANALYSIS

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 122-134
Author(s):  
Satria tri Nanda ◽  
Neneng Salmiah ◽  
Dina Mulyana
Keyword(s):  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Financial Stability ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Financial Statements ◽  
Annual Reports ◽  
Manufacturing Companies ◽  
Fraudulent Financial Reporting ◽  
Financial Reports ◽  
Fraudulent Financial Statements

Financial statements describe the company's financial condition. There are many gaps in the financial reports that enable management to commit fraudulent financial reporting. This study purpose to analyze the pentagon fraud, namely the pressure that is proxied by the financial target, the opportunity that is proxied by the effectiveness of monitoring (ineffective monitoring); Rationalization which is proxied by change in auditor; Competence which is proxied by the change of company directors; and Arrogance which is proxied by the number of CEO images that appear (number of CEO's picture), detects fraudulent financial statements measured using the Altman Z Score. The sample used in this study were 24 pharmaceutical sub-sector manufacturing companies registered on the Indonesia Stock Exchange during the period 2015 until 2017. The type of data used is secondary data obtained from annual reports and company financial statements for the 2015-2017 period. The analysis of the data used is multiple regression using the SPSS version 16. This study found that financial stability and ineffective monitoring influence fraudulent financial statements. Whereas auditor turnover, change of directors and the number of CEO photos that appear do not affect fraudulent financial statements.

scholarly journals The Analysis of Fraudulent Financial Reporting Determinant through Fraud Pentagon Approach

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 154-165
Author(s):  
Siska Apriliana ◽  
Linda Agustina
Keyword(s):  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Financial Stability ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Annual Reports ◽  
Fraud Triangle ◽  
Manufacturing Companies ◽  
Fraudulent Financial Reporting ◽  
Fraud Theory

The purpose of this study was to analyze the prediction of fraudulent financial reporting with the perspective of pentagon fraud. Pentagon fraud theory is the development of the theories of fraud triangle and fraud diamond. The Pentagon fraud theory adds an element of arrogance in addition to the other four existing elements namely pressure, opportunity, rationalization, and competence or capacity. The population in this study were 157 manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) period 2013-2015. The samples of 46 companies were obtained by using purposive sampling technique, so the analysis unit was 138. Data was analyzed by using descriptive statistical analysis and logistic regression analysis. The test result showed that financial stability, the quality of external auditor, and the number of CEOs photos in the annual reports of the companies had a positive effect on the prediction of fraudulent financial reporting, while financial targets, liquidity, institutional ownership, monitoring effectiveness, replacement of external auditors, and changes of corporate directors had no significant effect on the prediction of fraudulent financial reporting. The conclusion of this study indicates that unstable financial condition, the quality of corporate audit and the level of CEO's arrogance can influence the occurrence of fraudulent financial reporting.

scholarly journals ANALISIS FAKTOR-FAKTOR DALAM PERSPEKTIF FRAUD TRIANGLE SEBAGAI PREDIKTOR FRAUDULENT FINANCIAL REPORTING

2018 ◽  
pp. 251
Author(s):  
I Gusti Putu Oka Surya Utama ◽  
I Wayan Ramantha ◽  
I Dewa Nyoman Badera
Keyword(s):  
Organizational Structure ◽  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Financial Stability ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
External Pressure ◽  
Fraud Triangle ◽  
Fraudulent Financial Reporting ◽  
Financial Need ◽  
Positive Effect

The reduction of financial reporting information’s quality is caused by management fraud behavior by manipulate the financial reporting in order to looks good. This research aims to obtain empirical evidence the effect of fraud triangle factors are financial stability, external pressure, personal financial need, financial targets, nature of industry, ineffective monitoring, organizational structure, and auditor switching to fraudulent financial reporting in nonfinancial companies which listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange period 2012-2014. The sample determined by utilizing purposive sampling technique, therefore as many as 156 of observation sample was obtained. The data observed by logistic regression analysis method. The results show that pressure element these are financial stability, external pressure, and personal financial need has a positive effect to fraudulent financial reporting. Opportunity element these are organizational structure has a negative effect to fraudulent financial reporting. Rationalization element, auditors switching has a positive effect to fraudulent financial reporting. Meanwhile financial targets, nature of industry, and ineffective monitoring have no effect.

Fraudulent financial reporting: an application of fraud diamond to Toshiba’s accounting scandal

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Polydoros Demetriades ◽  
Samuel Owusu-Agyei
Keyword(s):  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Strong Relationship ◽  
Annual Reports ◽  
Fraudulent Financial Reporting ◽  
Financial Statement Fraud ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Four Dimensions ◽  
Score Model ◽  
High Level

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine Toshiba’s fraudulent financial reporting in relation to the fraud diamond (pressure, opportunity, rationalisation and capability). Design/methodology/approach A quantitative empirical research, analysing secondary data from Toshiba’s published annual reports before restatement, from 2008–2014 has been used. A simultaneous equations approach was used to test the hypothesis. Excel software was used to analyse secondary data and to carry out correlation analysis and descriptive statistics analysis. Findings This study uncovers evidence that pressure proxied by return on assets (ROA), the opportunity proxied by ineffective monitoring (BDOUT), rationalisation proxied by audit opinion (AO) and capability proxied by board member changes (BCHANGE) had moderate to strong relationship to financial statement fraud (FSF) (proxied by Beneish M-score model). However, ROA has a negative and significant effect on Toshiba’s FSF. BDOUT, AO and BCHANGE have positive and significant effect on Toshiba’s FSF. Furthermore, there is no multicollinearity problem within the four variables. Overall, this study has statistically proven that all dimensions of fraud diamond are required for the explanation of Toshiba’s accounting scandal. Originality/value Although a few studies discuss the four dimensions (fraud diamond), none, to our surprise, exists which explain the circumstances led Toshiba’s high-level executives to commit fraud. This study is the first thorough investigation of Toshiba’s accounting scandal that uses all four dimensions to explain Toshiba’s FSF.

scholarly journals Pengaruh Karakteristik Komite Audit, Perusahaan dan Struktur Kepemilikan Terhadap Kecurangan Pelaporan Keuangan

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 50
Author(s):  
Andrian Budi Prasetyo
Keyword(s):  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Audit Committee ◽  
Quantitative Methods ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Annual Reports ◽  
Fraudulent Financial Reporting ◽  
Financial Expertise ◽  
Firm Characteristic

This study examines the effect of audit committee characteristics, firm characteristic and ownership structure on the likelihood of fraudulent financial reporting. Audit committee characteristics is examined by audit committee financial expertise, meetings of the audit committee and the audit committee tenure. Firm characteristic is examined by the leverage, firm size, firm’s growth rate and external auditor. Ownership structure is examined by managerial ownership and institutional ownership. This research is using a quantitative methods research. This research is using secondary data that comes from the cases list of Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK) and annual reports of the listed companies on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX). Using a sample of 15 fraud and 15 non-fraud firms, we did not find a significant relation between the independent variabels and fraudulent financial reporting.

scholarly journals Pentagon Fraud Analysis in Detecting Fraudulent Financial Reporting Using the Fraud Score Model

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 158-170
Author(s):  
Roza Mulyadi ◽  
Fita Rani Aulia ◽  
Mega Arum
Keyword(s):  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Quantitative Research ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Fraudulent Financial Reporting ◽  
Test Analysis ◽  
Quantitative Research Methods ◽  
Testing Method ◽  
Score Model

This study was conducted to determine the effect of pentagon fraud (pressure, opportunity, rationalization, capability and arrogance) in detecting fraudulent financial reporting using F-Score in financial companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2017-2019. Using associative quantitative research methods. The population of this study are 100 companies with 49 sample of companies for 3 periods, so the sample total is 147 samples was obtained which was taken by purposive sampling technique. The testing method of this research is through multiple regression analysis with the SPSS 22 program. The results of the partial test analysis show that pressure and opportunity has significant effect in detecting fraudulent financial reporting. Whereas rationalization, capability and the arrogance variable has insignificant effect in detecting fraudulent financial reporting. The test results simultaneously are pressure, opportunity, rationalization, capability and arrogance has significant effect in detecting fraudulent financial reporting.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document