Awareness survey and improvement plan for the right to request a monthly rent ceiling and contract renewal - He's a citizen living in the metropolitan area -

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 205-229
Author(s):  
Yun Jo Huh ◽  
Choon Won Lee
2015 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 192
Author(s):  
Oscar F. Herrán ◽  
Gonzalo A. Patiño

 Resumen Objetivo: Se analizó el acceso a la alimentación en el marco del goce efectivo de derechos en población en situación de desplazamiento forzado en el Área Metropolitana de Bucaramanga, Colombia. Materiales y métodos: Durante el segundo semestre de 2010 y el primero de 2011, se entrevistaron 272 familias siguiendo los parámetros de las Encuestas Nacionales de Verificación (ENV2007-ENV2010). Resultados: La principal causa de desplazamiento fue la amenaza directa (71,8%), seguida de los asesinatos (11,3%). El 91,2% de las familias se encontraba en el Registro Único de Población Desplazada (RUDP). El 33,5% de las familias, afirmó consumir menos alimentos de los necesarios, porque la comida no alcanzó. En el 24,6%, dejó de consumir al menos una comida principal por falta de dinero. Estar inscrito en el RUDP no se traduce en ventajas relativas con respecto al derecho a la alimentación. Conclusión: La situación de la población del Área Metropolitana de Bucaramanga en materia del goce efectivo del derecho a la alimentación no se cumple y corrobora la existencia de un estado de cosas inconstitucional. La situación de inseguridad alimentaria que atraviesan las familias en situación de desplazamiento forzado es similar a la que se registra en el país a través de las Encuestas Nacionales de Verificación.Abstract Objective: The access to food in the framework of the full enjoyment of rights in population in a situation of forced displacement in the Metropolitan Area of Bucaramanga, Colombia was analyzed. Materials and methods: 272 families were interviewed during the second half of 2010 and the first half of 2011 taking into account the parameters of the National Surveys of Verification (ENV2007-ENV2010). Results: The main cause of displacement was the direct threat (71.8%), followed by murder (11.3%). 91.2% of the families was registered in the Single Register of Displaced Population (RUDP). 33.5% of the families claimed they were consuming less food than needed because the food was not enough. 24.6% of the families stopped eating at least one main meal due to lack of money. Being enrolled in RUDP does not mean they have relative advantages with respect to the right to food. Conclusion: The situation of the population of the Metropolitan Area of Bucaramanga in terms of the effective enjoyment of the right to food is not fulfilled and confirms the existence of an unconstitutional state of affairs. The situation of food insecurity that families in a situation of forced displacement deal with is similar to that registered around the country through the National Surveys of Verification.


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 159-180
Author(s):  
Joaquín Martín Cubas ◽  
Pilar Rochina Garzón ◽  
Francisco Clemente González

Voting behaviour in Valencia’s Metropolitan Area can be split into four periods: (1) During the early years of democracy (1979-1991) following the Franco dictatorship, the area was a stronghold of the Left; (2) In 1991, the City of Valencia switched and was governed by the Right; (3) In 2011, the Right extended its control to the whole of the Metropolitan Area; (4) In the May 2015 elections, the Left won not only in the ‘red’ metropolitan belt but also in the City of Valencia. This study looks at what happened in the last set of local elections in 2019. To this end, we begin with a brief review of the election results, voting trends, and the institutional performance of each party since the first post-dictatorship local elections in 1979. We then go on to analyse the electoral behaviour of each of the parties, breaking this down by geographical variables: town/village size, comarcas (‘counties’), and the so-called ‘red belt’ before drawing our conclusions.


2010 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 129-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
FATIMA HAMLAOUI

It is argued that in Francilian French, the dialect of French spoken in the Paris metropolitan area, in-situ and frontedwh-questions have the same answerhood conditions but vary with respect to their respective focus-set (Reinhart 2006). The difference between the two types of questions lies in the discourse status of their non-whportion. Whereas thewh-phrase is never discourse-given, the non-whportion may or may not be, depending on the discourse context. In Francilian French in-situwh-questions, the non-whportion must be discourse-given. As this language exhibits a strong requirement on sentence stress to be kept rightmost it cannot, in contrast with English, assign sentence stress to a frontedwh-phrase when the non-whportion is discourse-given and needs to be destressed. The only way to simultaneously destress discourse-given items and keep sentence stress rightmost is by aligning thewh-phrase with the right edge of the clause. Whereas in Hungarian prosody triggers movement (Szendrői 2003), in Francilian French, prosody prevents it from occurring. An Optimal Theoretic analysis in the spirit of much recent work on focus and givenness in declaratives (Samek-Lodovici 2005, Féry & Samek-Lodovici 2006) captures this phenomenon.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. 376-376
Author(s):  
J Finlay ◽  
H R McCarron ◽  
T L Statz ◽  
R Zmora

2009 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffery Taylor

University academic staff in Alberta operate under a collective bargaining regime in which compulsory arbitration replaces strike/lockout to resolve disputes over contract renewal. How did this come about? And what has the experience been under a regime of interest arbitration? This paper addresses these questions by investigating the origins of faculty association collective agreements in Alberta, tracing arbitral experience over the past thirty years, and looking more closely at a group of four arbitrations in 2001-2003. The paper concludes by asking whether it is time for academic staff associations to assert their fundamental right to strike, regardless of what is in their collective agreements or in the statute governing their collective bargaining.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document