scholarly journals Use of the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors gefitinib, erlotinib, afatinib, dacomitinib, and icotinib in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review

2015 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 183 ◽  
Author(s):  
P.M. Ellis ◽  
N. Coakley ◽  
R. Feld ◽  
S. Kuruvilla ◽  
Y.C. Ung

Introduction This systematic review addresses the use of epidermal growth factor receptor (egfr) inhibitors in three populations of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (nsclc) patients—unselected, selected, and molecularly selected—in three treatment settings: first line, second line, and maintenance.Methods Ninety-six randomized controlled trials found using the medline and embase databases form the basis of this review.Results In the first-line setting, data about the efficacy of egfr tyrosine kinase inhibitors (tkis) compared with platinum-based chemotherapy are inconsistent. Results from studies that selected patients based on clinical characteristics are also mixed. There is high-quality evidence that an egfr tki is preferred over a platinum doublet as initial therapy for patients with an activating mutation of the EGFR gene. The egfr tkis are associated with a higher likelihood of response, longer progression-free survival, and improved quality of life. Multiple trials of second-line therapy have compared an egfr tki with chemotherapy. Meta-analysis of those data demonstrates similar progression-free and overall survival. There is consequently no preferred sequence for second-line egfr tki or second-line chemotherapy. The egfr tkis have also been evaluated as switch-maintenance therapy. No molecular marker could identify patients in whom a survival benefit was not observed; however, the magnitude of the benefit was modest.Conclusions Determination of EGFR mutation status is essential to making appropriate treatment decisions in patients with nsclc. Patients who are EGFR mutation–positive should be treated with an egfr tki as first-line therapy. An egfr tki is still appropriate therapy in patients who are EGFR wild-type, but the selected agent should be administered as second- or third-line therapy.

BMJ Open ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. e046451
Author(s):  
Kageaki Watanabe ◽  
Kiyotaka Yoh ◽  
Yukio Hosomi ◽  
Kazuhiro Usui ◽  
Go Naka ◽  
...  

IntroductionOsimertinib, a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), is widely used as the first-line treatment for EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Nevertheless, most cases ultimately acquire resistance to osimertinib, and no effective treatment has been currently established for cases having progressive disease (PD) with osimertinib. In clinical practice, EGFR-TKI therapy could be continued beyond response evaluation criteria in solid tumours (RECIST)-defined PD cases when they are clinically stable. Currently, the progression pattern of osimertinib and criteria for identifying patients who might benefit from osimertinib beyond PD are unknown. In addition, the efficacy and safety of osimertinib as the first-line treatment in real-world clinical practice remain unclear in Japan. This multicentre study was designed to evaluate the real-world data on first-line osimertinib and its post-treatment.Methods and analysisThe study enrols patients with EGFR mutation-positive, advanced or recurrent NSCLC who received EGFR-TKI as the first-line therapy after 1 September 2018, from October 2019 to August 2020, and those started on osimertinib will be followed up until August 2022. We will evaluate the efficacy and safety of the first-line osimertinib treatment, adherence to it, progression patterns on RECIST PD and subsequent treatment.Ethics and disseminationAll participating patients will provide written informed consent before entering the study. The protocol, amendments and patients’ informed consent forms will be approved before study commencement by the institutional review board or independent ethics committee at each participation site (Lead Ethics Committee; Japan Red Cross Medical Center (26 April 2019, order number 976)). Patients will be anonymised before registration into the study and their anonymised data will be collected from the case report form. The results of this study will be presented at the national and international conferences and submitted for publication.Trial registration numberUMIN000038683.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19005-e19005
Author(s):  
Yoshihito Kogure ◽  
Chiyoe Kitagawa ◽  
Masahide Oki ◽  
Hideo Saka

e19005 Background: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation show a survival benefit on treatment with EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI); however, few studies report on post-progression tumor behavior after treatment with EGFR-TKI. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed clinical data of stage IV or recurrent NSCLC patients harboring the EGFR mutation, who received EGFR-TKI as first-line treatment in our institute from 2009 to 2011. Results: Thirty-six patients received EGFR-TKI as first-line therapy. Thirty of these patients with recurrent NSCLC were enrolled in this study. The median age of the patients was76 years (range, 38–97), and the male/female ratio was 4/26. The median progression-free survival (PFS) after EGFR-TKI treatment was 8.2 months. Sites of relapse in patients with progressive disease (PD) were the brain, pleural effusion, bone, and lung (n=5, 13, 6, and 8, respectively). Twenty-one patients received sequential therapy: 11 patients received continued EGFR-TKI treatment beyond PD and 10 patients received second-line therapy. Second-line therapies were platinum-based doublet therapy, monotherapy, and another cycle of EGFR-TKI (n = 6, 2, and 2 patients, respectively). Post-progression survival (PPS) of all the patients after treatment with EGFR-TKI was 9.2 months, whereas that of patients who received EGFR-TKI as second-line chemotherapy was 14 months. Subgroup analysis according to the site of relapse showed that after first-line EGFR-TKI treatment, PFS tended to be higher for patients with a relapse in the brain (11.6 months) than for patients with sites of relapse other than the brain (8.2 months). Conclusions: PPS after EGFR-TKI therapy in patients treated with second-line chemotherapy was similar to the OS of NSCLC patients without an EGFR mutation. Subgroup analysis showed that patients with a relapse in the brain might survive longer.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Min Peng ◽  
Yi Ming Weng ◽  
Hua Li Liu ◽  
Gui Fang Yang ◽  
Yi Yao ◽  
...  

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated that epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 19 deletion (19Del) and exon 21 L858R mutation (L858R) are highly correlated with sensitivity to epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) treatment in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A mutation in exon 20 (T790M) is reportedly associated with resistance to EGFR-TKIs. However, few studies have focused on patients harboring double mutations in these 3 mutation sites. In this retrospective study, forty-five patients (45/2546, 1.7%) harbored double mutations of 19Del, L858R, and T790M. Twenty-four patients with EGFR double mutations received EGFR-TKI therapy. Clinical characteristics of these patients, including the response to EGFR-TKIs and progression-free survival outcome for EGFR-TKI treatment (PFS-TKI), were analyzed. Patients with EGFR double mutations were more likely to be nonsmokers, have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) of 0-1, have adenocarcinoma, and be at stage III-IV. The ORR, DCR, and median PFS-TKI in patients harboring EGFR double mutations were lower than in patients with a single EGFR-activating mutation. The differences in ORR and DCR were statistically insignificant between the 3 groups. Patients with double mutations of 19Del and T790M had longer PFS-TKIs than patients in the other 2 groups.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document