scholarly journals Mekanisme Corporate Governance Dan Nilai Perusahaan

2014 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 83-97
Author(s):  
Nia Yuniarsih

The objective of this study is to examine the influence of corporate governance mechanism, namely managerial ownership, institutional ownership, to firm value. This study takes sample from 32 companies in the manufacturing sector at the  Indonesia Stock Exchange, which were published in financial report from 2012-2013. The method of analysis of this research used multi regression and single regression. The results of this study show that (1) managerial ownership had positive significant influence to firm value, (2) institutional ownership had not significant influence to firm value, (3) simultaneously of managerial ownership, institutional ownership, had significant influence to firm value.

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 83
Author(s):  
Rina Hartanti ◽  
Fahri Yulandani ◽  
M Rizky Riandi

The purpose of this study is to explain the effect of Profitability, Capital Structure, and the application of Good Corporate Governance to Firm Value. The population of the study includes companies registered in the LQ-45 which are listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the period 2015-2017. The technique of determining the sample used is purposive sampling. This study uses a multiple linear regression approach. Based on the results of testing, this study proves that profitability, capital structure, and the application of the GCG mechanism together affect firm value. This study also proves that partially profitability proxied by ROA and Managerial Ownership has a positive effect on Firm Value. The results showed that capital, which is proxied by DER and GCG, which is proxied by Institutional Ownership, does not have a positive effect on Corporate Value


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 155
Author(s):  
Karmila Febrianti ◽  
Nurul Hasanah Uswati Dewi

This research aims to examine the effect of corporate governance on company value of LQ 45 companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX). The corporate governance mechanism consists of institutional ownership, proportion of independent commissioner, managerial ownership, independent audit committee, remuneration and nomination committee, board of directors, and board of commissioners, while firm value is proxied by Tobin’s Q. This research used 106 companies as a sample taken from a population of 135 companies in LQ 45 listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) period 2015-2017. The data were analyzed using a multiple linier regression analysis with SPSS program. The result shows that corporate governance mechanisms which are proxied by institutional ownership, proportion of independent commissioners, board of directors, and board of commissioners have an effect on firm value, while the corporate governance which are proxied by managerial ownership, independent audit committee, and remuneration and nomination committee have no effect on firm value.


2011 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-65
Author(s):  
Brenda Prasasti ◽  
Jimmy Ardianto

   The objective of the empirical study is to examines whether corporate governance mechanism which consists of institutional ownership, managerial ownership, size of director to earnings management, and presence of independent of director had an influence on earnings management. Earnings management is proxied by discretionary accruals that are estimated using Jones model.   This study takes sample from 47 companies listed in Indeks Kompas 100 has been reviewed during the year of 2008-2009. Double linier regression analysis is used to analyze the effect of corporate governance mechanism on earnings management.   The result on this study shows that (1) Simultaneously of corporate governance mechanism which consists of institutional ownership, managerial ownership, size of director to earnings management, and presence of independent of director had significant influence on earnings management, (2) Institutional ownership had not significant inffluence on earnings management, (3) Manajerial ownership had positive significant influence onearnings management, (4) Size of director had not significant inffulence on earnings management, (5) Presence of independent of director had not significant influence on earnings management. Keywords : Corporate Governance Mechanism, Earnings Management


2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Raras Mahiswari ◽  
Paskah Ika Nugroho

<em>The purpose of this study is to examine the influence of corporate governance mechanism, namely institutional ownership, managerial ownership,size of commissioner, presence of independent of commissioner, and size of audit committee, also firms size and leverage on earnings management. This research also examines the influence of earnings management on financial performance. The samples of 31 companies listed on Indonesian Stock Exchange (IDX), for a period of three years from 2007-2009 was selected. Data were analyzed by using multiple regression and simple regression. The results of this research showed that institutional ownership and leverage have a significant impact on earnings management. Managerial ownership, size of commissioner, presence of independent of commissioner, size of audit committee, also firms size have no significant relationships with earnings management. Next, earnings management has a significant impact on financial performance.</em>


Author(s):  
Wiwik Pratiwi ◽  

This research aims to provide empirical evidence on the influence of corporate governance mechanism (audit committee, independence board of commissioner, institutional ownership, managerial ownership), accounting conservatism, and company size on earnings quality. Sample used in this research are manufacturing company listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) in 2016-2018 using purposive sampling and obtained 29 companies. This research used secondary data of annual report or financial statement obtained from Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) or company website in 2016-2018 period. Data were analyzed using multiple regression method. The finding of this research are institutional ownership and managerial ownership partially has positive significant effect to earnings quality. The accounting conservatism and company size partially has negative significant effect to earnings quality. Whether the audit committee and independence board of commissioner has no significant effect to earnings quality. In addition, corporate governance mechanism, accounting conservatism and company size simultaneously has a significant effect to earnings quality.


2009 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Maria Gorethi Berek ◽  
Elok Pakaryaningsih

The objective of this research is to examine the effect of corporate governance mechanism on investment decision. Using two ways of measurement, namely, board size and institutional ownership, corporate governance is hypothesized to have an effect oninvestment decision in which measured by asset growth, equity growth and debt growth.Using real estate industry listed at Jakarta Stock Exchange as the sample, the result shows that both institutional ownership and board size do not affect investment decision.Keywords: Corporate governance, investment decision, institutional ownership, board size


2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 717-744 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mian Du ◽  
Siyan Chen ◽  
Huan Shao

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate the relationship between corporate governance mechanism and firm value of the listed companies in China. Does the better corporate governance lead to the higher firm value? Or does the higher firm value make it easy to choose a better governance mechanism? Or they affect each other? In other words, this paper tries to answer whether the corporate governance mechanism is only decided by institutional arrangement, or by market choice according to firm value or performance or by the interaction of institutional arrangement and market choice? It tries to answer whether institutional arrangement maximizes the firm value, or an invisible hand pushes them to arrive at its maximum. Design/methodology/approach – This paper establishes an analytic framework of simultaneous equations based on causality, which includes five endogenous variables: ownership of larger shareholders, managerial ownership, director compensation, debt financing and firm value. It adopts 1,644 data samples from 274 Chinese listed companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchange during 2007- 2012 after the non-tradable shares reform. Ordinary least squares (OLS) estimation of single equation, 2SLS and 3SLS estimation of simultaneous equations are respectively done to show the differences of these three kinds of estimations. Findings – The empirical results show that differences exist among OLS, 2SLS and 3SLS estimation. Finally, 3SLS estimation should be adopted because the OLS and 2SLS estimation are biased. There are endogenous relationships between corporate governance mechanism and firm value. Through the 3SLS estimation, it is found that first, ownership concentration and firm value affect each other positively. Second, managerial ownership and firm value affect each other positively; third, director compensation and firm value affect each other negatively, while director compensation and firm performance affect each other positively. Finally, debt financing level and firm value are negatively related to each other. Practical implications – It means that ownership of large shareholders, managerial ownership, director compensation and debt financing in the Chinese listed companies are found to have a root in the interaction between institutional arrangement and market choice. It is also found that adverse selection occurs when creditors loan to the listed companies. Managerial compensation is positively related to accounting profit, but it is negatively related to firm value because managers increase profit due by earning management. This could only increase the accounting profits and obtain huge cash compensation, but not increase firm value and even harm the interests of shareholders. Originality/value – This paper not only shows the difference between OLS and 2SLS estimation but also compares the estimation of 2SLS and 3SLS in terms of empirical methods. It gives answers to the following questions: whether the relationship is one-way causality or bilateral causality between ownership concentration, managerial ownership, director compensation and firm value; whether governance mechanism affects firm value by institutional arrangement, or market drives both of them to strike a balance by an invisible hand. In other words, does it make them arrive at equilibrium through the competitive selection process when shareholders, directors, managers and creditors attempt to maximize themselves of their interests?


2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Muhammad Rivandi ◽  
Maria Magdalena Gea

This study aims to examine the effect of corporate governance mechanism on the timeliness of financial reporting. The sample of this study are four central banking companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) selected based on purposive sampling method. The method of data analysis used in this study is multiple regression models. Based on the hypotheses testing result, that the managerial ownership and audit committee have a positive and significant effect on the timeliness of financial reporting, while independent commissioner has no effect on the timeliness of financial reporting


2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 67
Author(s):  
Habiba Habiba

Accounting conservatism is a condition where a company acknowledges the debts and costs more quickly, but on the other hand, the company acknowledges the income and assets more slowly. Some factors that can affect the accounting conservatism are stan-dards changes, corporate governance, and so forth. The purpose of this study is to analyze the effect occurring on the variable of accounting conservatism when using comprehensive income and income for the current year in manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange in 2012 and 2013. The variables studied are institutional ownership, managerial ownership, the existence of audit committee, the number of audit committee meetings, and leverage. The statistical method used in this study is multiple regression analysis. The results of this study indicate that institu-tional ownership, managerial ownership, and the number of audit committee meetings do not have significant effect on accounting conservatism when using comprehensive income and income for the current year, but the variables of the existence of audit committee and leverage have significant effect on accounting conservatism when using comprehensive income and income for current the year.


2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 158-173
Author(s):  
Rama Andi Wiguna ◽  
Muhammad Yusuf

This research aimed to get empirical evidence about the effect of profitability and good corporate governance as proxied by the proportion of independent board commissioners, number of board commissioners meetings, proportion of audit committee, number of audit committee meetings, managerial ownersip and institutional ownership. The population of this research was companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2016-2017. The sample of this research was fixed by purposive sampling method so that was found 88 samples. Technique of data analysis was multiple linear regression. The result of research showed that profibility, the proportion of independent board commissioners, proporsion of audit committee, managerial ownership and institutional ownership had significant positive effect on firm value, while commissioners meetings and audit committee meetings had no effect on firm value


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document