scholarly journals Fergana Valley Architectural School Decoration Methods

2020 ◽  
Vol 02 (12) ◽  
pp. 21-25
Author(s):  
Arifjan Salimov Muslimovich ◽  
◽  
Abdurakhmanov Ulugbek Arabdjon ogli ◽  
Tursunova Dilnoza Raufjonovna ◽  
◽  
...  

Thanks to independence, attention is paid to restoring historical memory, perpetuating the memory of those who fought for independence, revealing historical justice associated with the fate of our country, revealing the recent black pages of our people and nation, drawing conclusions from this history.It is a duty and duty to perpetuate the memory of the innocent victims.

Author(s):  
Natal'ya P. Kalashnikova ◽  

The article presents a system analysis on the activities for the Assembly of People of Kazakhstan over the past twenty-five years of operation of that institution. The materials of the article reflect a generalised scientific and expert opinion on the processes of political discourse formation related to the understanding and perception of such contexts as “signs of the nation”, “national identity”, “intercultural dialogue”, “memory”, etc. The author pays special attention to the implementation of the Assembly’s projects aimed at strengthening the common historical memory, historical justice, as well as at the consolidation of Kazakhstan’s multi-ethnic society. The key focus of the article is the implementation of the international project “Memory for the Future’s Sake”, initiated by the Republic of Kazakhstan in 2009. The author analyses the project’s geography, goals and objectives, and examines the participation in its implementation of national and foreign scientists and experts, descendants of repressed and deported peoples. In addition, the article analyses the possibilities of the project “Memory for the Future’s Sake” to positively influence the formation and maintenance of historical memory, which unites the Kazakh society and at the same time contributes to its positive interaction with the surrounding world in general and with neighbours in the post-Soviet space, in particular.


Author(s):  
Olga Katola

The article seeks to analyze a little-known publicism of I. Franko. It was prohibited in the period of the Soviet totalitarianism, and was made available for research only during the modern era of history of Ukraine. Publicistic articles of I. Franko covering problems of emergence, molding and development of the Ukrainian state, contain deep reflections on ultimate need of its existence as a fundamental basis for progress and prosperity of the Ukrainian people. A necessity of studying the indicated publicistic works is determined not only by restoration of historical justice, but also awareness of their resonance with many contemporary Ukrainian problems rooted in the very old times and yet awaiting their solutions. Furthermore, Ukraine faces new challenges ― a need to make up the lost time to preserve and strengthen its positions in complex world geopolitical situation; overcoming tough economic dependence on other countries; war with the Russian Federation, a problem of not nominal, but real unity of the country, as well as spiritual one. Ivan Franko is regarded as one of the first critics of the essential flaws of scholarly socialism, communist concept of state, social and democratic doctrines. He considers in his publicistic articles, a vulnerability of the Marxism theory, as well as raises issues with academic integrity of its creators (specifically, attribution of other scholars’ copyright). Keywords: Ivan Franko, publicism, national ideal, state independence, Malorussianism, Moscowphilism, social-democratic ideology, historical memory, challenges of modernity.


2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily Rosser ◽  
Paula Godoy-Paiz ◽  
Tal Nitsan

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 142-156
Author(s):  
A. Yu. Timofeev

The article considers the perception of World War II in modern Serbian society. Despite the stability of Serbian-Russian shared historical memory, the attitudes of both countries towards World wars differ. There is a huge contrast in the perception of the First and Second World War in Russian and Serbian societies. For the Serbs the events of World War II are obscured by the memories of the Civil War, which broke out in the country immediately after the occupation in 1941 and continued several years after 1945. Over 70% of Yugoslavs killed during the Second World War were slaughtered by the citizens of former Kingdom of Yugoslavia. The terror unleashed by Tito in the first postwar decade in 1944-1954 was proportionally bloodier than Stalin repressions in the postwar USSR. The number of emigrants from Yugoslavia after the establishment of the Tito's dictatorship was proportionally equal to the number of refugees from Russia after the Civil War (1,5-2% of prewar population). In the post-war years, open manipulations with the obvious facts of World War II took place in Tito's Yugoslavia. In the 1990s the memories repressed during the communist years were set free and publicly debated. After the fall of the one-party system the memory of World War II was devalued. The memory of the Russian-Serbian military fraternity forged during the World War II began to revive in Serbia due to the foreign policy changes in 2008. In October 2008 the President of Russia paid a visit to Serbia which began the process of (re) construction of World War II in Serbian historical memory. According to the public opinion surveys, a positive attitude towards Russia and Russians in Serbia strengthens the memories on general resistance to Nazism with memories of fratricide during the civil conflict events of 1941-1945 still dominating in Serbian society.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document