scholarly journals Negative induction in instrumental behavior reinforced by central stimulation

1965 ◽  
Vol 2 (1-12) ◽  
pp. 341-342 ◽  
Author(s):  
David R. Williams
Perception ◽  
1973 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 307-314 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iize V Kalnins ◽  
J S Bruner

Infants aged 5–12 weeks were shown a silent colour film whose clarity/focus was contingent on their sucking on a dummy nipple. In the ‘suck-for-clear’ condition the mean rate of sucking increased significantly over baseline level, and decreased when the contingency shifted to ‘suck-for-blur’. When the initial condition was suck-for-blur, sucking rate remained close to baseline level (even after the shift to suck-for-clear). Time spent looking at the clear film increased in both conditions, but there was little change in looking at the blurred pictures. With the introduction of the contingency conditions patterns of looking at the clearing and cleared pictures changed, and looking at the cleared picture increased in the suck-for-clear but not the suck-for-blur condition. Asymmetry of the results indicates that infants are better able to use an active response for instrumental means than to inhibit a response to achieve instrumental control. Implications for the development of voluntary control of action are explored.


2007 ◽  
Vol 92 (5) ◽  
pp. 1002-1009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam Derenne ◽  
Matthew L. Arsenault ◽  
David P. Austin ◽  
Jeffrey N. Weatherly

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dirk Geurts ◽  
Hanneke den Ouden ◽  
Lotte Janssens ◽  
Jennifer Swart ◽  
Monja Isabel Froböse ◽  
...  

Background: Control over the tendency to make or withhold responses based on contextual Pavlovian information, might play a key role in understanding impulsivity/hyperactivity in ADHD. Here we set out to assess (1) the understudied relation between Pavlovian inhibitory control and hyperactivity/impulsivity in adults with ADHD and (2) whether this inhibition can be enhanced by mindfulness based cognitive therapy (MBCT).Methods: 50 Adult ADHD patients were assessed before and after 8 weeks of treatment as usual (TAU) with (n=24) or without (n=26) MBCT. We employed a sophisticated, well-established Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer task that quantifies Pavlovian control over instrumental behavior. Results: Task results revealed (1) less aversive Pavlovian inhibition in patients with clinical hyperactivity/impulsivity; and (2) enhanced inhibition after TAU+MBCT compared with TAU. Conclusions: Aversive Pavlovian inhibition plays a role in clinically relevant hyperactivity/impulsivity in adult ADHD and MBCT can be used to enhance this form of inhibition.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document