scholarly journals Alertness and cognitive control: Interactions in the spatial Stroop task

2020 ◽  
Vol 82 (5) ◽  
pp. 2257-2270 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darryl W. Schneider
2019 ◽  
Vol 133 ◽  
pp. 107190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandra Tafuro ◽  
Ettore Ambrosini ◽  
Olga Puccioni ◽  
Antonino Vallesi

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Albert Lehr ◽  
Niklas Henneberg ◽  
Tarana Nigam ◽  
Walter Paulus ◽  
Andrea Antal

Behavioral response conflict arises in the color-word Stroop task and triggers the cognitive control network. Midfrontal theta-band oscillations correlate with adaptive control mechanisms during and after conflict resolution. In order to prove causality, in two experiments, we applied transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) at 6 Hz to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) during Stroop task performance. Sham stimulation served as a control in both experiments; 9.7 Hz tACS served as a nonharmonic alpha band control in the second experiment. We employed generalized linear mixed models for analysis of behavioral data. Accuracy remained unchanged by any type of active stimulation. Over both experiments, the Stroop effect (response time difference between congruent and incongruent trials) was reduced by 6 Hz stimulation as compared to sham, mainly in trials without prior conflict adaptation. Alpha tACS did not modify the Stroop effect. Theta tACS can both reduce the Stroop effect and modulate adaptive mechanisms of the cognitive control network, suggesting midfrontal theta oscillations as causally involved in cognitive control.


2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sensen Song ◽  
Anna Zilverstand ◽  
Hongwen Song ◽  
Federico d’Oleire Uquillas ◽  
Yongming Wang ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 227 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlotte Laurenson ◽  
Philip Gorwood ◽  
Manuel Orsat ◽  
Jean-Paul Lhuillier ◽  
Didier Le Gall ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 610-629 ◽  
Author(s):  
HENRIKE K. BLUMENFELD ◽  
VIORICA MARIAN

Bilinguals have been shown to outperform monolinguals at suppressing task-irrelevant information and on overall speed during cognitive control tasks. Here, monolinguals’ and bilinguals’ performance was compared on two nonlinguistic tasks: a Stroop task (with perceptualStimulus–Stimulus conflictamong stimulus features) and a Simon task (withStimulus–Response conflict). Across two experiments testing bilinguals with different language profiles, bilinguals showed more efficient Stroop than Simon performance, relative to monolinguals, who showed fewer differences across the two tasks. Findings suggest that bilingualism may engage Stroop-type cognitive control mechanisms more than Simon-type mechanisms, likely due to increased Stimulus–Stimulus conflict during bilingual language processing. Findings are discussed in light of previous research on bilingual Stroop and Simon performance.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (10) ◽  
pp. e0187254 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Sachs ◽  
Jonas Kaplan ◽  
Alissa Der Sarkissian ◽  
Assal Habibi

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document