scholarly journals Evaluation of the Subjective Effect of Middle Ear Implantation in Hearing-Impaired Patients with Severe External Otitis

2007 ◽  
Vol 18 (06) ◽  
pp. 496-503 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ad F.M. Snik ◽  
Noortje T.L. van Duijnhoven ◽  
Jef J.S. Mulder ◽  
Cor W.R.J. Cremers
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Middle Ear ◽  
Hearing Aids ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Reference Value ◽  
Hearing Impaired ◽  
External Otitis ◽  
Calidad De Vida ◽  
Glasgow Benefit Inventory

The subjective benefit of middle ear implantation was studied in a group of 23 hearing-impaired patients who could not use conventional hearing aids owing to severe chronic external otitis. Changes in hearing disability (Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit [APHAB]) and changes in quality of life (Glasgow Benefit Inventory [GBI]) were determined. Mean benefit value on the APHAB for the subscale Ease of Communication was close to the mean reference value for conventional hearing aids. For the subscales Reverberation and Background Noise, a poorer result was found. Individual analysis of the APHAB scores showed significant benefit in 12 out of the 23 patients. According to the GBI, 16 out of 17 patients reported that middle ear implantation had made a positive impact on their quality of life. It is concluded that middle ear implantation has a positive effect on hearing difficulties and quality of life in hearing-impaired subjects who cannot use conventional devices. The APHAB outcomes were not better than those reported for conventional devices. Se estudió el beneficio subjetivo de la implantación del oído medio en un grupo de 23 pacientes hipoacúsicos que no podían utilizar auxiliares auditivos convencionales debido a una otitis externa crónica severa. Se determinaron los cambios en discapacidad auditiva (Perfil Abreviado del Beneficio del Auxiliar Auditivo [APHAB]) y los cambios en la calidad de vida (Inventario Glasgow de Beneficio [GBI]). El valor medio de beneficio en el APHAB para la sub-escala Facilidad de Comunicación fue cercano al valor medio de referencia para los auxiliares auditivos convencionales. Para las sub-escalas de Reverberación y Ruido de Fondo, se encontró un resultado más pobre. El análisis individual de los puntajes APHAB mostró un beneficio significativo en 12 de los 23 pacientes. De acuerdo con el GBI, 16 de los 17 pacientes reportaron que la implantación del oído medio había tenido un impacto positivo en la calidad de sus vidas. Se concluye que la implantación del oído medio tiene un efecto positivo sobre las dificultades de comunicación y sobre la calidad de vida en sujetos hipoacúsicos que no pueden utilizar dispositivos convencionales. Los resultados del APHAB no fueron mejores que aquellos reportados con dispositivos convencionales.

AGE-RELATED ISSUES OF THE QUALITY OF LIFE IN HEARING IMPAIRED PATIENTS

2021 ◽  
pp. 885-892
Author(s):  
Л. Е. Голованова ◽  
Е. А. Огородникова ◽  
Е. С. Лаптева ◽  
М. Ю. Бобошко
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Hearing Aids ◽  
Pure Tone Audiometry ◽  
Hearing Impaired ◽  
Hearing Disorders ◽  
Age Related ◽  
Sf 36 ◽  
Significant Difference

Целью исследования было изучение качества жизни лиц с нарушениями слуха в разных возрастных группах. Обследованы 100 пациентов, обратившихся в городской сурдологический центр для взрослых в связи с нарушением слуха: 50 человек - 34-59 лет, 50 - 60 лет и старше, из которых 32 человека были пожилого возраста (60-74 года)и 18 - старческого (75-86 лет). Степень тугоухости оценивали на основании результатов тональной пороговой аудиометрии. Для исследования качества жизни все пациенты заполняли общий опросник MOS SF-36, отражающий физический и психологический компоненты здоровья, а также специальный опросник HHIА(E)-S для лиц с нарушениями слуха. Установлено, что шкала HHIА(E)-S демонстрирует высокую корреляцию со степенью тугоухости у пациентов моложе 60 лет ( R =0,98; достоверность различий на уровне p <0,05), которая снижается у пациентов 60 лет и старше ( R =0,94; различия в оценках при разной степени тугоухости недостоверны). Значительные трудности в старшей возрастной группе могут быть связаны с тем, что людям пожилого и, особенно, старческого возраста сложно пользоваться слуховыми аппаратами (или они для них неэффективны) и оценивать свои затруднения по шкалам опросника. Целесообразно использовать шкалу HHIА(Е)-S в качестве скринингового инструмента для раннего выявления тугоухости, направления пациентов к сурдологу и своевременного слухопротезирования. The aim of the research was to study the quality of life in hearing impaired patients of different age. 100 patients referred to the city audiology centre because of their hearing disorders were examined: 50 patients from 34 to 59 years old and 50 patients from 60 years and older, from which 32 patients were of older age (60 to 74 years old) and 18 of oldest age (75 to 86 years old). A degree of hearing loss was assessed according to results of pure tone audiometry. To study the quality of life all patients filled in the questionnaire MOS SF-36, which evaluates physical and psychological components of health, and the questionnaire HHIA(E)-S, designed specifically for patients with hearing disorders. The HHIA(E)-S scale was found to show high correlation with hearing loss degree in patients younger than 60 years old ( R =0,98 with statistically significant difference, p <0,05), with decreasing correlation in patients from 60 years and older ( R =0,98; no significant difference while assessing various hearing loss degrees). Considerable difficulties in this age group may be explained by the fact, that older and especially oldest patients have a challenge with hearing aids usage (or they are of low efficiency for them) and with assessing theirs difficulties on the questionnaire scales. The HHIA(E)-S scale is useful as a screening tool for early detection of hearing loss, referral of patients to an audiologist and prompt hearing aid fitting.

Bone-anchored hearing aids in children and young adults: the Freeman Hospital experience

2010 ◽  
Vol 125 (2) ◽  
pp. 153-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y Ramakrishnan ◽  
S Marley ◽  
D Leese ◽  
T Davison ◽  
I J M Johnson
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Young Adults ◽  
Hearing Aids ◽  
Hearing Aid ◽  
Adult Population ◽  
Significant Proportion ◽  
Glasgow Benefit Inventory ◽  
Bone Anchored Hearing Aid ◽  
Children And Young Adults

AbstractObjective:To investigate the utilisation of bone-anchored hearing aids and Softband, as well as the effects on quality of life, amongst the paediatric and young adult population of Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.Method:Retrospective, anonymised, cross-sectional survey using the Glasgow Benefit Inventory and Listening Situation Questionnaire (parent version), administered at least three months following the start of bone-anchored hearing aid or Softband use.Results:One hundred and nine patients were included, of whom syndromic children made up a significant proportion (22 of 109). Patients using bone-anchored hearing aids obtained significant educational and social benefit from their aids. The mean Listening Situation Questionnaire difficulty score was 17 (15 patients), which is below the trigger score of 22+ at which further reassessment and rehabilitation is required. 87% (of 15 patients) did not require further intervention. The overall mean GBI score for the 22 patients (syndromic and non-syndromic) was +29.Conclusion:The use of bone-anchored hearing aids and Softband results in significant improvements in quality of life for children and young adults with hearing impairment. There is significant under-utilisation of bone-anchored hearing aids in children with skull and congenital abnormalities, and we would advocate bone-anchored hearing aid implantation for these patients.

The Impact of Hearing Aids on Quality of Life of Hearing Impaired Individuals

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fatima Zafar ◽  
Hafiz Muhammad Usama Basheer ◽  
Amber Hassan ◽  
Wajeeha Zaib ◽  
Tehmeena Waheed
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Hearing Aids ◽  
Hearing Aid ◽  
Residual Activity ◽  
Hearing Impaired ◽  
P Value ◽  
Daily Routine ◽  
The Impact

The regular use of hearing aids (more than 8 hours a day) benefits people in hearing for bettercommunication than those who are less-likely to use hearing aids Objective: The objective of thestudy was to assess the impact of hearing aids on the quality of life of hearing impaired individualsMethods: In this cross-sectional study total 50 participants were recruited by convenient samplingtechnique from Lahore, Pakistan. 50 patients who were diagnosed with hearing loss and wererecommended with hearing aids of both genders were included in the study. The International OutcomeInventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA), questionnaire was used for data collection. Data were analyzedthrough Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 23.0 Results: In this research 50hearing impaired individuals who were hearing aid users, participated. The mean age of participants was64.10+15.88 years. Among which 25 (50%) were males and 25(50%) were females. The average time ofhearing aid use was 3.88 hours, majority of patients responded that hearing aid helped quite a lot in thedaily routine (mean score of IOI-HA, 3.62), have moderate difficulty in residual activity (mean score of IOIHA,3.26), moderately satisfied with their hearing aid (mean score of IOI-HA, 3.28), moderately affect theparticipation restriction (mean score of IOI-HA, 3.20), impact of their hearing loss bothered moderately(mean score of IOI-HA, 3.14) and quality of life (QOL) was very much better (3.90). There was insignificantassociation between the QOL of males and females (p-value>0.05) Conclusions: It was concluded fromthe study that the hearing aids have a greater impact on the quality of life and socio-economic aspectsof hearing impaired individuals. Hearing loss is such a problem, which separates certain community ofhearing impaired individuals from the normal population. Individuals with hearing impairment not onlyhave to face personal communication problems but also it affects their health, independency and qualityof life in their daily routine.

scholarly journals Self-reported outcomes of aural rehabilitation for adult hearing aid users in a developing South African context

2010 ◽  
Vol 57 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elaine Pienaar ◽  
Natalie Stearn ◽  
De Wet Swanepoel
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
South African ◽  
Hearing Aids ◽  
Hearing Impaired ◽  
Healthcare Sector ◽  
Public Healthcare ◽  
South African Context ◽  
Aural Rehabilitation ◽  
African Context

Hearing impairment has far reaching consequences for affected individuals, in terms of quality of life indicators. In a developing South African context the hearing impaired population is faced with limited aural rehabilitation services. This study evaluated self-reported outcomes of aural rehabilitation in a group of adults in the public healthcare sector with a standardized outcomes measurement tool (IOI-HA). Sixty-one respondents participated (44% males; 56% females), with a mean age of 69.7 years. Results revealed that the majority of respondents experienced favourable outcomes in all domains of the inventory comprising of: daily use of hearing aids, benefits provided by hearing aids, residual activity limitation, satisfaction with hearing aids, residual participation restriction, impact of hearing difficulties on others, and changes in quality of life. Statistically significant relationships were obtained between the daily use of hearing aids, the degree of hearing loss, and the type of hearing aids fitted, as well as the benefits received from hearing aids in difficult listening environments (p < 0.05). Despite challenges of developing contexts, the mean scores distribution compared positively to similar reports from developed countries. Outcomes of improved quality of life emphasize the importance of providing affordable hearing aids and services to all hearing impaired individuals in South Africa.

scholarly journals Bienestar y calidad de vida en estudiantes con implante coclear Well-being and quality of life in students with a cochlear implant

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 329
Author(s):  
Olga María Alegre de la Rosa ◽  
Luis Miguel Villar Angulo
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Hearing Aids ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Kappa Index ◽  
Calidad De Vida ◽  
Para Determinar ◽  
Los Grupos ◽  
Hearing Difficulties

Con el objeto de conocer el bienestar y calidad de vida de estudiantes con implante coclear, se administró el cuestionario KINDLR,[1] que estima el bienestar y calidad de vida en actividades cotidianas a una muestra de 187 estudiantes con implante coclear y a otra muestra de 113 con audífonos. También se aplicó la versión correspondiente a 156 padres para comparar las opiniones de los niños con la de sus padres. Se aplicó un análisis multivariante de la varianza de una vía para determinar si había diferencias entre los grupos de estudiantes y sus padres en más de una variable dependiente continua (dimensiones del cuestionario KINDLR) y el índice Kappa y coeficiente de correlación intraclase para ver en qué medida existía concordancia entre los sujetos de las muestras evaluando la variabilidad de sus diferencias. Los estudiantes con implante coclear percibieron el bienestar y la calidad de vida de forma distinta a los que usaban audífonos. Existió acuerdo entre las opiniones de ambos grupos de estudiantes y las opiniones de sus padres en el bienestar y calidad de vida total. Se pueden utilizar los resultados de este estudio para crear estrategias de asesoramiento personal, familiar y escolar cara a la mejora en la calidad de vida y el bienestar personal y social de los niños con dificultades auditivas.ABSTRACTIn order to know the well-being and quality of life (WQoL) of students with cochlear implants (CI) and hearing aids (HA), the KINDLR questionnaire was administered to a sample of 187 CI students and to another sample of 113 students with HA. A modified KINDLR questionnaire was also applied to 156 parents to compare their opinions with those of their children. A one-way multivariate analysis of variance was applied to determine if there were differences between the independent groups (students and their parents) in more than one continuous dependent variable (KINDLR dimensions). In addition, a Kappa index and an intraclass correlation coefficient examined whether there was agreement between the students and their parents by means of assessing variability for WQoL improvement. Students with CI perceived WQoL differently compared to students using HA. There was an agreement between the opinions of both groups of students and the opinions of their parents on the total WQoL. The results of this study can be used to create personal, family and school counseling strategies to improve WQoL of students with hearing difficulties.[1] Se denomina cuestionario KINDLR a la herramienta evaluativa alemana creada por Ravens-Sieber y Bullinger (1998) empleada en español para medir el bienestar y calidad de vida de estudiantes (Kiddy-KINDLR para niños de 4 a 7 años, Kid-KINDLR para niños de 8-11 años,  Kiddo-KINDLR para niños de 12-16 años) y la versión adaptada del cuestionario Kid- & Kiddo-KINDLRpara padres.  

scholarly journals Aural rehabilitation programme for hearing impaired: a psychosocial intervention

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (12) ◽  
pp. 4952
Author(s):  
Manisha K. Juneja ◽  
Mamta Sharma ◽  
Surinder Singhal
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Social Isolation ◽  
Hearing Aids ◽  
Learned Helplessness ◽  
Rehabilitation Program ◽  
Hearing Impaired ◽  
Aural Rehabilitation ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Perceived Social Isolation

Background: Hearing impairment i.e., reduced hearing acuity, has adverse effects on the physical, cognitive, emotional, behavioral, and social functions of an individual, resulting in passivity, social withdrawal, and negative impact on the quality of life (QOL). The present study aimed to determine whether participation in a counseling-based aural rehabilitation program and hearing aids would enhance the QOL of severely hearing-impaired by reducing their learned helplessness and social isolation.Methods: The study included 52 participants (35 males and 17 females) in the age range of 45-65 years having severe hearing loss with high perceived social isolation and learned helplessness and low quality of life. Scales used are Friendship scale for social isolation, LH scale for learned helplessness, and WHOQOL-Bref for quality of life. A paired t-test was applied to see the significant difference between pre and post scores.Results: Pre- and post-intervention analysis showed that learned helplessness and perceived social isolation was significantly reduced as a function of intervention with a substantially better quality of life.Conclusions: Aural rehabilitation program combined with hearing aids resulted in a better quality of life by reducing isolation and helplessness.

Quality of Life in Hearing-Impaired Adults: The Role of Cochlear Implants and Hearing Aids

2004 ◽  
Vol 131 (4) ◽  
pp. 413-422 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seth M. Cohen ◽  
Robert F. Labadie ◽  
Mary S. Dietrich ◽  
David S. Haynes
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Cochlear Implants ◽  
Hearing Aids ◽  
Hearing Impaired
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document