Health information technology for ambulatory care in health systems

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-38
2008 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 372-378 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael G. Leu ◽  
Ming Cheung ◽  
Tashonna R. Webster ◽  
Leslie Curry ◽  
Elizabeth H. Bradley ◽  
...  

10.19082/6319 ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 6319-6326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ghasem Deimazar ◽  
Mehdi Kahouei ◽  
Afsane Zamani ◽  
Zahra Ganji

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (01) ◽  
pp. 103-103

Wang J, Liang H, Kang H, Gong Y. Understanding health information technology induced medication safety events by two conceptual frameworks. Appl Clin Inform 2019;10:158–67 https://www.thieme-connect.com/products/ejournals/abstract/10.1055/s-0039-1678693 Lee JY, van Karnebeek CDM, Wasserman WW. Development and user evaluation of a rare disease gene prioritization workflow based on cognitive ergonomics. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2019;26(2):124–33 https://academic.oup.com/jamia/article/26/2/124/5235389 Patterson ES, Su G, Sarkar U. Reducing delays to diagnosis in ambulatory care settings: A macrocognition perspective. Appl Ergon 2020 Jan;82:102965 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003687019301826?via%3Dihub


Medical Care ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 50 ◽  
pp. S11-S19 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Keith McInnes ◽  
Julie A. Brown ◽  
Ron D. Hays ◽  
Patricia Gallagher ◽  
James D. Ralston ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph Featherall ◽  
Brittany Lapin ◽  
Alexander Chaitoff ◽  
Sonia A Havele ◽  
Nicolas Thompson ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND Consumer health information technology can improve patient engagement in their health care and assist in navigating the complexities of health care delivery. However, the consumer health information technology offerings of health systems are often driven by provider rather than patient perspectives and inadequately address patient needs, thus limiting their adoption by patients. Consideration given to patients as stakeholders in the development of such technologies may improve adoption, efficacy, and consumer health information technology resource allocation. OBJECTIVE The aims of this paper were to measure patient interest in different health system consumer health information technology apps and determine the influence of patient characteristics on consumer health information technology interest. METHODS Patients seen at the Cleveland Clinic Neurological Institute were electronically surveyed on their interest in using different consumer health information technology apps. A self-efficacy scale, Patient Health Questionnaire-9 depression screen, and EuroQol 5 dimensions health-related quality of life scale were also completed by patients. Logistic regression was used to determine the influence of patient characteristics on interest in consumer health information technology in the categories of self-management, education, and communication. RESULTS The majority of 3852 patient respondents had an interest in all technology categories assessed in the survey. The highest interest was in apps that allow patients to ask questions of providers (3476/3852, 90.24%) and to schedule appointments (3211/3839, 83.64%). Patient interest in consumer health information technology was significantly associated with greater depression symptoms, worse quality of life, greater health self-efficacy, and smartphone ownership (P<.001 for all listed). CONCLUSIONS Patients should be viewed as active stakeholders in consumer health information technology development and their perspectives should consistently guide development efforts. Health systems should consider focusing on consumer health information technologies that assist patients in scheduling appointments and asking questions of providers. Patients with depression should also be considered for targeted consumer health information technology implementation. Health self-efficacy is a valid predictor of consumer health information technology interest and may play a role in the utilization of consumer health information technologies. Health systems, broadly, should put forth greater effort to understand the needs and interests of patients in the consumer health information technology development process. Consumer health information technology design and implementation may be improved by understanding which technologies patients want.


2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 408-412 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer L Wolff ◽  
Victoria S Kim ◽  
Suzanne Mintz ◽  
Rebecca Stametz ◽  
Joan M Griffin

Abstract We sought to understand the comprehensiveness of consumer-oriented information describing the availability of shared access to adult patient portals from publicly reported information on institutional websites of 20 large and geographically diverse health systems. All 20 health systems reported that they offer patients the ability to share access to their patient portal account with a family member or friend; however, the comprehensiveness of information regarding registration procedures, features, and terminology varied widely. Half of the systems (n = 10) reported having shared access available on their patient portal registration webpage. Few systems (n = 2) reported affording patients the ability to differentiate specific role-based privileges. No systems reported uptake of shared access among adult patients, which was variably described as “proxy,” “caregiver,” “parental,” or “delegate” access. Findings suggest that engaging families through health information technology will require greater efforts to promote awareness and differentiate privileges that respect patients’ choice and control in information-sharing preferences.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document