scholarly journals En torno al alcance de las prestaciones de salud que brindan las obras sociales a personas con discapacidad dentro del marco de la legislación nacional e internacional / On the scope of health benefits provided by social works to people with disabilities

2019 ◽  
pp. 214-224
Author(s):  
Valentina Ruiz de los Llanos
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Health Benefits ◽  
People With Disabilities ◽  
Court Of Justice ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Comprehensive Coverage

El presente trabajo, tiene por finalidad el análisis de un nuevo fallo de la Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nación, referido a los alcances de las prestaciones en materia de salud que las Obras Sociales deben brindar a las personas con discapacidad y qué debe entenderse por cobertura integral.   The purpose of this work is to analyze a new ruling of the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation, referring to the scope of health benefits that Social Works must provide to people with disabilities and to analyze what should be understood by comprehensive coverage.

scholarly journals El principio de razonabilidad en la cobertura de las prestaciones de salud / The principle of reasonability in the coverage of health benefits

2018 ◽  
pp. 144-154
Author(s):  
María Yanina Gázquez
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Health Benefits ◽  
Public And Private ◽  
Court Of Justice ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Comprehensive Coverage

El siguiente artículo tiene por objeto analizar, a partir de un fallo reciente de la Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nación, cual es el alcance de la frase “cobertura integral de las prestaciones de salud en caso de discapacidad” y que parámetro deben utilizar los prestatarios públicos y privados al momento de otorgar las mismas.   The following article is intended to analyze, from a recent ruling of the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation, what is the scope of the phrase "comprehensive coverage of health benefits in case of disability" and what parameter should be used by public and private borrowers at the time of granting them.

scholarly journals Derecho a la salud vs. derecho de defensa / Right to health vs. right of defense

2018 ◽  
pp. 164-170
Author(s):  
Nadia Virginia Copello
Keyword(s):  
Social Work ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Due Process ◽  
People With Disabilities ◽  
Right To Health ◽  
Court Of Justice ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Medical Benefits ◽  
The Right

La Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nación Argentina revocó una sentencia que condenaba a una Obra Social al cumplimiento de prestaciones médicas. En el novedoso caso están en juego el derecho a la salud, a la cobertura médica integral de personas con discapacidad y el derecho de defensa, más precisamente, el respeto por el debido proceso, siendo esto último la base para así decidir en favor de la demandada.   The Supreme Court of Justice of the Argentine Nation revoked a sentence that condemned a Social Work to the fulfillment of medical benefits. In the new case, the right to health, the comprehensive medical coverage of people with disabilities and the right to defense are at stake, more precisely, respect for due process, the latter being the basis for deciding in favor of the defendant.

scholarly journals Fortaleza ante la vulnerabilidad de personas con discapacidad / Strength in the face of vulnerability of people with disabilities

2018 ◽  
pp. 179-197
Author(s):  
María Milena Belanti
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
People With Disabilities ◽  
Economic Deprivation ◽  
Court Of Justice ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Face ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Child With A Disability

vEn el caso “Tejera, Valeria Fernanda C/ ANSES y otro s/ varios” la Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nación resuelve a favor de que una mujer pueda percibir una Asignación Universal por Hijo y una pensión provincial para su hijo menor discapacitado, entendiendo que gozar de ambas no es incompatible. A través del presente comentario se intentará hacer una aproximación del razonamiento de la Corte en una ejemplar decisión que recayó sobre una persona de extrema vulnerabilidad: un niño, con discapacidad y en condiciones de carencias económicas.   In the case "Tejera, Valeria Fernanda C / ANSES and other s / several" the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation resolves in favor of a woman being able to receive a Universal Assignment for Child and a provincial pension for her disabled minor child, understanding that to enjoy both is not incompatible. Through this commentary we will try to approximate the reasoning of the Court in an exemplary decision that fell on a person of extreme vulnerability: a child, with a disability and in conditions of economic deprivation.

scholarly journals La cobertura integral de prestaciones a las personas con discapacidad / The comprehensive coverage of benefits for people with disabilities

2018 ◽  
pp. 155-163
Author(s):  
Ángeles María Báez
Keyword(s):  
Social Work ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
People With Disabilities ◽  
Right To Health ◽  
Persons With Disabilities ◽  
Court Of Justice ◽  
The Social ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Right ◽  
Court Of First Instance

El presente trabajo versará sobre el análisis de una polémica sentencia de la Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nación en la que se decide a favor de la Obra Social del Poder Judicial de la Nación, la cual había impugnado la resolución que la condenaba a prestar cobertura íntegra a una persona con discapacidad. El fundamento de la Corte: la omisión por parte del Tribunal de Primera Instancia de la aplicación de la resolución OSPJ 822/13 que establece las condiciones de cobertura de la prestación de asistencia domiciliaria de las personas con discapacidad, que es compatible con la Ley 24.901. Sin duda alguna, un caso controvertido en el que se encuentra en juego el derecho a la salud, la protección de las personas con discapacidad y el alcance de la cobertura de las obras sociales.   The present work will deal with the analysis of a controversial sentence of the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation in which it is decided in favor of the Social Work of the Judicial Power of the Nation, which had challenged the resolution that condemned it to provide coverage integrates a person with a disability. The basis of the Court: the omission by the Court of First Instance of the application of the resolution OSPJ 822/13 that establishes the conditions of coverage of the provision of domiciliary assistance for persons with disabilities, which is compatible with Law 24,901. Undoubtedly, a controversial case in which the right to health is at stake, the protection of people with disabilities and the scope of coverage of social works.

scholarly journals El derecho a la salud de personas con discapacidad y su cobertura por parte del Estado / The right to health of people with disabilities and their coverage by the State

2018 ◽  
pp. 171-178
Author(s):  
María Florencia Blanco Pighi
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
People With Disabilities ◽  
Right To Health ◽  
The State ◽  
Court Of Justice ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Right ◽  
Formal Requirements

El derecho a la salud es reconocido por la Constitución Argentina, pero, como todo derecho, no es absoluto. La Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nación, mediante el fallo en análisis, establece ciertos requisitos para asegurar la cobertura por parte del Estado, de prestaciones que garanticen el acceso a este derecho para personas con discapacidad. El voto en disidencia establece que, muchas veces, apegarse a requisitos formales puede implicar cercenar el goce efectivo del derecho a la salud, que es de carácter constitucional.   The right to health is recognized by the Argentine Constitution, but, as every right, is not absolute. The Supreme Court of Justice, through the sentence to analyze, establishes certain requirements to ensure coverage by the State of benefits that guarantee access to this right for people with disabilities. The dissident vote establishes that, often, adhering to formal requirements may imply clogging the effective enjoyment of the right to health, which is constitutional in nature.

Public Committee Against Torture in Israel v. Government of Israel. Case No. HCJ 769/02

2007 ◽  
Vol 101 (2) ◽  
pp. 459-465 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Bodansky ◽  
Orna Ben-Naftali ◽  
Keren Michaeli
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
International Law ◽  
Armed Conflicts ◽  
Direct Part ◽  
Customary International Law ◽  
High Court ◽  
Additional Protocol ◽  
Court Of Justice ◽  
The Supreme Court

Public Committee Against Torture in Israel v. Government of Israel. Case No. HCJ 769/02. At <http://elyonl.court.gov.il/files_eng/02/690/007/a34/02007690.a34.pdf>.Supreme Court of Israel, sitting as the High Court of Justice, December 13, 2006.In Public Committee Against Torture in Israel v. Government of Israel1 Targeted Killings) the Supreme Court of Israel, sitting as the High Court of Justice, examined the legality of Israel's “preventative targeted killings” of members of militant Palestinian organizations. The Court's unanimous conclusion reads:The result of the examination is not that such strikes are always permissible or that they are always forbidden. The approach of customary international law applying to armed conflicts of an international nature is that civilians are protected from attacks by the army. However, that protection does not exist regarding those civilians “for such time as they take a direct part in hostilities” (§51(3) of [Additional Protocol I]). Harming such civilians, even if the result is death, is permitted, on the condition that there is no less harmful means, and on the condition that innocent civilians are not harmed. Harm to the latter must be proportional. (Para. 60)

scholarly journals Las sentencias exhortativas de la Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nación a la luz del derecho de ejecución de sentencias. /

2021 ◽  
pp. 105-119
Author(s):  
Cynthia Belén Contreras
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Fundamental Rights ◽  
Court Of Justice ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Complex Cases ◽  
Sobre Todo ◽  
The Way

Las sentencias exhortativas de la Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nación son un instituto jurídico de reciente y novedosa aparición en nuestro sistema argentino de derecho. Entre los años 2005 a 2012, la Corte Argentina, llegó el punto más álgido en lo que respecta a la producción y dictado de este tipo de sentencias atípicas, sobre todo en casos complejos y de transcendencia pública e institucional que involucraban a su vez derechos fundamentales. Nuestro país, está dando los primeros pasos en lo que respecta al dictado de sentencias exhortativas y en el camino se ha topado con algunos obstáculos al momento de la ejecución de sentencia. Este trabajo propone la identiicación y descripción de dichas dificultades con las que deben lidiar los operadores jurídicos, víctimas y actores a los fines de hacer realidad los derechos declarados en las sentencias exhortativas de la Corte.Abstract The exhortative sentences of the Supreme Court of Justice are a legal institute of recent and novel appearance in our Argentine system of law. From 2005 to 2012, the Argentine Supreme Court reached to the highest point with regard to the production and delivery of this type of atypical sentences, especially in complex cases of public and institutional transcendence which involved fundamental rights. Our country is taking the irst steps regarding the issuance of exhortative sentences and along the way it appears some obstacles at the time of the execution of the sentences. his work proposes the identiication and description of the diiculties with which legal operators, victims and actors must deal with in order to make the rights declared in the Court's exhortative judgments a reality.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document