scholarly journals Review of Clustering Methods for Slow Coherency-Based Generator Grouping

2021 ◽  
pp. 5-20
Author(s):  
G. Chicco

Slow coherency is one of the most relevant concepts used in power systems dynamics to group generators that exhibit similar response to disturbances. Among the approaches developed for generator grouping based on slow coherency, clustering algorithms play a significant role. This paper reviews the clustering algorithms applied in model-based and data-driven approaches, highlighting the metrics used, the feature selection, the types of algorithms and the comparison among the results obtained considering simulated or measured data.

IEEE Access ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 97114-97128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jie Lian ◽  
Pingping Dong ◽  
Yuping Zhang ◽  
Jianguo Pan ◽  
Kehao Liu

Sensors ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 2085
Author(s):  
Xue-Bo Jin ◽  
Ruben Jonhson Robert RobertJeremiah ◽  
Ting-Li Su ◽  
Yu-Ting Bai ◽  
Jian-Lei Kong

State estimation is widely used in various automated systems, including IoT systems, unmanned systems, robots, etc. In traditional state estimation, measurement data are instantaneous and processed in real time. With modern systems’ development, sensors can obtain more and more signals and store them. Therefore, how to use these measurement big data to improve the performance of state estimation has become a hot research issue in this field. This paper reviews the development of state estimation and future development trends. First, we review the model-based state estimation methods, including the Kalman filter, such as the extended Kalman filter (EKF), unscented Kalman filter (UKF), cubature Kalman filter (CKF), etc. Particle filters and Gaussian mixture filters that can handle mixed Gaussian noise are discussed, too. These methods have high requirements for models, while it is not easy to obtain accurate system models in practice. The emergence of robust filters, the interacting multiple model (IMM), and adaptive filters are also mentioned here. Secondly, the current research status of data-driven state estimation methods is introduced based on network learning. Finally, the main research results for hybrid filters obtained in recent years are summarized and discussed, which combine model-based methods and data-driven methods. This paper is based on state estimation research results and provides a more detailed overview of model-driven, data-driven, and hybrid-driven approaches. The main algorithm of each method is provided so that beginners can have a clearer understanding. Additionally, it discusses the future development trends for researchers in state estimation.


Energies ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 887
Author(s):  
Xianliang Cheng ◽  
Suzhen Feng ◽  
Yanxuan Huang ◽  
Jinwen Wang

Peak-shaving is a very efficient and practical strategy for a day-ahead hydropower scheduling in power systems, usually aiming to appropriately schedule hourly (or in less time interval) power generations of individual plants so as to smooth the load curve while enforcing the energy production target of each plant. Nowadays, the power marketization and booming development of renewable energy resources are complicating the constraints and diversifying the objectives, bringing challenges for the peak-shaving method to be more flexible and efficient. Without a pre-set or fixed peak-shaving order of plants, this paper formulates a new peak-shaving model based on the mixed integer linear programming (MILP) to solve the scheduling problem in an optimization way. Compared with the traditional peak-shaving methods that need to determine the order of plants to peak-shave the load curve one by one, the present model has better flexibility as it can handle the plant-based operating zones and prioritize the constraints and objectives more easily. With application to six cascaded hydropower reservoirs on the Lancang River in China, the model is tested efficient and practical in engineering perspective.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregoire Preud’homme ◽  
Kevin Duarte ◽  
Kevin Dalleau ◽  
Claire Lacomblez ◽  
Emmanuel Bresso ◽  
...  

AbstractThe choice of the most appropriate unsupervised machine-learning method for “heterogeneous” or “mixed” data, i.e. with both continuous and categorical variables, can be challenging. Our aim was to examine the performance of various clustering strategies for mixed data using both simulated and real-life data. We conducted a benchmark analysis of “ready-to-use” tools in R comparing 4 model-based (Kamila algorithm, Latent Class Analysis, Latent Class Model [LCM] and Clustering by Mixture Modeling) and 5 distance/dissimilarity-based (Gower distance or Unsupervised Extra Trees dissimilarity followed by hierarchical clustering or Partitioning Around Medoids, K-prototypes) clustering methods. Clustering performances were assessed by Adjusted Rand Index (ARI) on 1000 generated virtual populations consisting of mixed variables using 7 scenarios with varying population sizes, number of clusters, number of continuous and categorical variables, proportions of relevant (non-noisy) variables and degree of variable relevance (low, mild, high). Clustering methods were then applied on the EPHESUS randomized clinical trial data (a heart failure trial evaluating the effect of eplerenone) allowing to illustrate the differences between different clustering techniques. The simulations revealed the dominance of K-prototypes, Kamila and LCM models over all other methods. Overall, methods using dissimilarity matrices in classical algorithms such as Partitioning Around Medoids and Hierarchical Clustering had a lower ARI compared to model-based methods in all scenarios. When applying clustering methods to a real-life clinical dataset, LCM showed promising results with regard to differences in (1) clinical profiles across clusters, (2) prognostic performance (highest C-index) and (3) identification of patient subgroups with substantial treatment benefit. The present findings suggest key differences in clustering performance between the tested algorithms (limited to tools readily available in R). In most of the tested scenarios, model-based methods (in particular the Kamila and LCM packages) and K-prototypes typically performed best in the setting of heterogeneous data.


2020 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
pp. 9784-9789
Author(s):  
Josué Gómez ◽  
Chidentree Treesatayapun ◽  
América Morales

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 1-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carmen Cheh ◽  
Uttam Thakore ◽  
Ahmed Fawaz ◽  
Binbin Chen ◽  
William G. Temple ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document