scholarly journals Accurate Assessment of Participation Rate of Breast Cancer Screening in Hiroshima Prefecture as an Effect of Prefectural Network for Breast Cancer Care

Author(s):  
Kazuya Miyoshi ◽  
Tsuyoshi Kataoka ◽  
Kenji Higaki ◽  
Kouki Inai ◽  
Shigeru Murakami ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
pp. 000313482096628
Author(s):  
Erica Choe ◽  
Hayoung Park ◽  
Ma’at Hembrick ◽  
Christine Dauphine ◽  
Junko Ozao-Choy

Background While prior studies have shown the apparent health disparities in breast cancer diagnosis and treatment, there is a gap in knowledge with respect to access to breast cancer care among minority women. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer from 2014 to 2016 to evaluate how patients presented and accessed cancer care services in our urban safety net hospital. Patient demographics, cancer stage, history of breast cancer screening, and process of referral to cancer care were collected and analyzed. Results Of the 202 patients identified, 61 (30%) patients were younger than the age of 50 and 75 (63%) were of racial minority background. Only 39% of patients with a new breast cancer were diagnosed on screening mammogram. Women younger than the age of 50 ( P < .001) and minority women ( P < .001) were significantly less likely to have had any prior screening mammograms. Furthermore, in patients who met the screening guideline age, more than half did not have prior screening mammograms. Discussion Future research should explore how to improve breast cancer screening rates within our county patient population and the potential need for revision of screening guidelines for minority patients.


2011 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 925-929 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. M. Timmers ◽  
G. J. den Heeten ◽  
E. M. Adang ◽  
J. D. Otten ◽  
A. L. Verbeek ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement 3) ◽  
pp. 48s-48s
Author(s):  
Andres Wiernik ◽  
Loretta Fernandez ◽  
Leonardo Lami ◽  
Greivin Vindas ◽  
Marissa Durman ◽  
...  

Purpose Founded in 2010, Hospital Metropolitano is the fastest growing health care system in Costa Rica with a network of two hospitals, 27 clinics, and more than 90,000 patients enrolled in its health plan, Medismart. Given the challenges faced by the national public health care system in providing cancer care, the Oncosmart program was launched in November 2016 with the goal of providing population-based cancer screening, diagnostics, cancer treatment, and survivorship care. The program has no restrictions on preexisting conditions and has a monthly membership cost of $14 USD per patient. Here, we summarize our breast cancer program results during the first 16 months of implementation. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis that evaluated data from our radiology department, cancer center, and survivorship program. We determined the number of patients with breast cancer who were diagnosed and/or received care in our health care system from November 2016 to March 2018. Results During this period analyzed, 5,687 mammograms were performed at our health care system and 215 patients were reported to have a Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System 4 to 5 requiring a breast biopsy. Of these, 24% were diagnosed with breast cancer, 36% had a nonmalignant breast condition, and 41% were false positives. Among patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer, 11% had noninvasive breast cancer and 89% had invasive disease. Twenty-seven percent of all breast cancer diagnosis occurred in women younger than age 50 years and two patients were diagnosed with a BRCA1/2 mutation. All biopsies performed at our program were reported within 30 days from abnormal imaging. During this period, we performed 53 breast cancer surgeries and provided chemotherapy and/or endocrine therapy to 32 patients, and among all patients who followed-up in the survivorship clinic, 22 followed-up for breast cancer survivorship. Conclusion Oncosmart is a low-cost and effective private initiative that improves access to breast cancer screening and breast cancer care in the middle-income country of Costa Rica. On the basis of national statistics, after 16 months of implementation, approximately 4% to 5% of all patients with breast cancer in the country are diagnosed within our program. AUTHORS' DISCLOSURES OF POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST The following represents disclosure information provided by authors of this manuscript. All relationships are considered compensated. Relationships are self-held unless noted. I = Immediate Family Member, Inst = My Institution. Relationships may not relate to the subject matter of this manuscript. For more information about ASCO's conflict of interest policy, please refer to www.asco.org/rwc or ascopubs.org/jco/site/ifc . Andres Wiernik Consulting or Advisory Role: Grupo Montecristo Leonardo Lami Employment: Roche, Genetech (I) Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche/Genetech (I) Marissa Durman Consulting or Advisory Role: Grupo Montecristo


2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (Supplement_4) ◽  
Author(s):  
C Padilla ◽  
P Soler Michel ◽  
V Vieira

Abstract Introduction Mammography screening can reduce breast cancer mortality among women aged 50 years and older. Small geographic areas with lower breast cancer screening uptake may reflect gaps in screening efforts. Our objective was to identify the geographic variations of breast cancer screening uptake among women aged 50-74 years in the Lyon Metropole area, France. Methods We used spatial regression models within a generalized additive framework to determine the clusters of census blocks with significantly lower risk of breast cancer screening uptake. Census block-level data on breast cancer screening participation rates were calculated for women aged 50-74 years who did a mammography between 2015-2016 after being invited with a letter by the cancer screening organization. Using smoothed risk maps adjusting for covariates, we estimated the impact of the spatial distribution of deprivation index, part of opportunistic screening on breast cancer screening participation. Results Between 2015 and 2016, the participation rate of organized breast cancer screening was 49.9%. As hypothesized, women living in highly deprived census blocks had lower participation rates compared to less deprived. However, women living in rural areas with fewer certified mammography services than in urban areas had the highest participation rate. Spatial analyses identified four clusters, one located in an urban area and three in suburban areas. Conclusions Our analysis indicates that depending on the location of the cluster, the influence came from different variables. Knowing the impact of site-specific risk factors is important for implementing an appropriate prevention intervention. Key messages Spatial analysis for cancer screening can help to improve health initiatives. This study contributes to a better understanding of the cluster-specific factors that explain geographic disparities.


2020 ◽  
pp. 096914132093074
Author(s):  
O Mandrik ◽  
E Tolma ◽  
N Zielonke ◽  
F Meheus ◽  
C Ordóñez-Reyes ◽  
...  

Objective To assess the determinants of the participation rate in breast cancer screening programs by conducting a systematic review of reviews. Methods We conducted a systematic search in PubMed via Medline, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane identifying the literature up to April 2019. Out of 2258 revealed unique abstracts, we included 31 reviews, from which 25 were considered as systematic. We applied the Walsh & McPhee Systems Model of Clinical Preventive Care to systematize the determinants of screening participation. Results The reviews, mainly in high-income settings, reported a wide range for breast cancer screening participation rate: 16–90%. The determinants of breast cancer screening participation were simple low-cost interventions such as invitation letters, basic information on screening, multiple reminders, fixed appointments, prompts from healthcare professionals, and healthcare organizational factors (e.g. close proximity to screening facility). More complex interventions (such as face-to-face counselling or home visits), mass media or improved access to transport should not be encouraged by policy makers unless other information appears. The repeated participation in mammography screening was consistently high, above 62%. Previous positive experience with screening influenced the repeated participation in screening programs. The reviews were inconsistent in the use of terminology related to breast cancer screening participation, which may have contributed to the heterogeneity in the reported outcomes. Conclusions This study shows that consistent findings of systematic reviews bring more certainty into the conclusions on the effects of simple invitation techniques, fixed appointments and prompts, as well as healthcare organizational factors on promoting participation rate in screening mammography.


1996 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 146-150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pedro Plans ◽  
Laura Casademont ◽  
Luis Salleras

AbstractIn the last several years, the development of an effective breast cancer screening procedure has increased the possibility of the early detection of this cancer. We investigated the cost-effectiveness of a breast cancer screening program to screen 100,000 women 50–64 years of age in Catalonia (Spain). The cost-effectiveness ratio was measured in terms of the cost per cancer detected comparing program costs to the estimated number of cancers detected. We assumed a participation rate, sensitivity, and specificity of 70%, 92%, and 94%, respectively, and that 0.36 breast cancers could be detected per 100 women screened. We estimated a total cost of $2.1 million with $1.4 million for the mammographic stage and $0.7 million for the detection of the true positive mammographic results. The cost per woman screened was $30. We estimated that 252 cases of breast cancer could be detected with the program. The cost-effectiveness ratio obtained in this study was $8,424 per cancer detected. Sensitivity analysis has shown that cost-effectiveness results are sensitive to the variations in the following variables: specificity, cancer detection rate, and screening costs. In planning preventive programs, breast cancer screening should be considered one of the priorities.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zahra Omidi ◽  
Maryam Koosha ◽  
Najmeh Nazeri ◽  
Nasim Khosravi ◽  
Shahpar Haghighat

Abstract BackgroundA lot of individual health behaviors and multi-faceted approached have been introduced for breast cancer early diagnosis and prevention. This systematic review aimed to investigate the status of Breast cancer preventive behaviors and screening indicators among Iranian women.MethodsIn this study, two reviewers included English and Persian articles about breast cancer screening modalities and its indicators in Iran from January 2005 to 2020. English electronic databases of Web of Science, PubMed and Scopus and Persian databases of SID and IranMedex were used. The critical information of articles was extracted and classified to different categories according to the studied outcomes. ResultsA total of 246 articles were assessed which 129 of them were excluded and 114 studies were processed for further evaluation. Performing BSE, CBE, and Mammo in Iranian women had been reported 0- 79.4%, 4.1%-41.1%, and 1.3%-45%, respectively. All of the educational interventions had increased the knowledge, attitude and practice of participants in performing the screening behaviors. The most important screening indicators included participation rate (3.8% to 16.8%), detection rate (0.23 to 8.5 per 1000), abnormal call rate (28.77% to 33%), and recall rate (24.7%).ConclusionThis systematic review demonstrated a lot of heterogeneity in population and design of researches about breast cancer early detection in Iran. The necessity of a cost-effective screening program, presenting a proper educational method for increasing women's awareness and estimating screening indices can be the priorities of future researches. Establishing big studies at the national level in a standard framework are advised


2011 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 152-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
GP Doyle ◽  
D Major ◽  
C Chu ◽  
A Stankiewicz ◽  
ML Harrison ◽  
...  

Introduction Participation rate is an important indicator for a screening program’s effectiveness; however, the current approach to measuring participation rate in Canada is not comparable with other countries. The objective of this study is to review the measurement of screening mammography participation in Canada, make international comparisons, and to propose alternative methods. Methods Canadian breast cancer screening program data for women aged 50 to 69 years screened between 2004 and 2006 were extracted from the Canadian Breast Cancer Screening Database (CBCSD). The fee-for-services (FSS) mammography data (opportunistic screening mammography) were obtained from the provincial ministries of health. Both screening mammography program participation and utilization were examined over 24 and 30 months. Results Canada’s screening participation rate increases from 39.4% for a 24-month cut-off to 43.6% for a 30-month cut-off. The 24-month mammography utilization rate is 63.1% in Canada, and the 30-month utilization rate is 70.4%. Conclusion Due to the differences in health service delivery among Canadian provinces, both programmatic participation and overall utilization of mammography at 24 months and 30 months should be monitored.


2021 ◽  
pp. 146-152
Author(s):  
Godfrey S. Philipo ◽  
Edda Vuhahula ◽  
Asteria Kimambo ◽  
Elia J. Mmbaga ◽  
Katherine Van Loon ◽  
...  

PURPOSE Clinical breast examination (CBE) is one of the most common methods used for early detection of breast cancer in low- and middle-income countries. CBE alone is limited by lack of specificity and may result in unnecessary diagnostic procedures. We evaluated the feasibility of integrating CBE, fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB), and rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) in triaging palpable breast masses for specialized cancer care. MATERIALS AND METHODS An intensive breast cancer screening event was conducted at a national trade fair by a multidisciplinary team of care providers targeting a healthy population in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. All adults age ≥ 18 years were invited to participate. CBE was performed by oncologists and/or pathologists. FNAB was performed by a pathologist on palpable masses that were then categorized as benign, indeterminate, or suspicious for malignancy or definitively malignant based on ROSE. RESULTS A total of 208 individuals (207 females, one male; median age, 36 years; range, 18-68 years) were screened. Most (90.8%, 189 of 208) had normal findings, whereas 7.2% (15 of 208), 1% (2 of 208), and 1% (2 of 208) had a palpable mass, breast pain, and nipple discharge, respectively. Two participants had lesions too small for palpation-guided biopsy and clinically consistent with fibroadenomas; the participants were counseled, and observation was recommended. FNAB was performed on 13 breast masses, with 9 of 13 (69%) categorized as benign and 4 of 13 (31%) suspicious for malignancy. Final cytopathologic review of referred patients confirmed one case to be breast adenocarcinoma, one was suggestive of fibroadenoma, and two showed inflammations. CONCLUSION Integration of CBE with ROSE and FNAB was feasible in a breast cancer screening program in Tanzania. In settings with constrained resources for cancer care, this may be an effective method for triaging patients with breast masses.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document