Easy Ear Wax Removal

2002 ◽  
Vol 30 (9) ◽  
pp. 50-50
Author(s):  
James Daniels ◽  
James Lynch ◽  
Eldon Frazier
Keyword(s):  
Ear Wax ◽  
BMJ ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 301 (6763) ◽  
pp. 1251-1253 ◽  
Author(s):  
J F Sharp ◽  
J A Wilson ◽  
L Ross ◽  
R M Barr-Hamilton
Keyword(s):  
Ear Wax ◽  

2011 ◽  
Vol 61 (591) ◽  
pp. e680-e683 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emma Loveman ◽  
Elena Gospodarevskaya ◽  
Andy Clegg ◽  
Jackie Bryant ◽  
Petra Harris ◽  
...  

BMJ ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 302 (6769) ◽  
pp. 182-182
Author(s):  
A J Drysdale
Keyword(s):  
Ear Wax ◽  

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 45-48
Author(s):  
Anup Acharya ◽  
Bhuwan Raj Pandey ◽  
Madan Mohan Singh ◽  
Shiva Bhushan Pandit

Introduction: There are various methods of ear wax extraction and there are no specific guidelines on this subject. Many times we ask patients to instil some wax softening product for a few days and revisit for wax removal. This revisits result in increased cost, discomfort and loss of time. We conducted this study to determine the effectiveness of same-day ear wax removal as an office procedure with one or more techniques. Our secondary objective was to find the association between various factors and successful wax removal. Methods: During the study period, all patients with ear wax managed by a single ENT surgeon were included. History and examination were done and findings noted. One or more methods including probe, forceps, hooks, curette, suction, wax softening with wax softening agents, syringing were applied for wax removal. Complete wax removal was noted as success. Results: There were a total of 63 cases of ear wax among 34 participants. Wax was successfully removed in 52 (82.5%) cases in the same day. Presence of ear ache, narrow canal, complete obstruction and hard dry wax were adversely associated with successful wax removal. Presence of ear fullness, ear discharge, or use of ear drops in home was not significantly associated with successful ear wax removal. Conclusion: We were able to extract wax from a large proportion of patients on the same day of visit, thereby reducing their cost of revisit, however there were 17.5% of cases who could not be treated successfully on the same day.  


2017 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-51
Author(s):  
Rosângela R. dos Santos ◽  
Cristiane N. Coelho ◽  
Tiago A.P. Nunes ◽  
Lilian Cristina de S.O. Batista ◽  
Thaís R. Correia ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT: The present study evaluated the efficacy of a single oral dose of doramectin in the control of Psoroptes ovis and Leporacarus gibbus in naturally infested rabbits. Sixteen adult rabbits were selected and distributed in two experimental groups. The treated group received 200 μg/Kg of oral doramectin and the control group received the same volume of saline solution. The diagnosis of the mites was made with a stereoscopic microscope. Hairs from the dorsal part of the neck, lumbar right, lumbar left, ventral side of the tail and ventral abdomen were evaluated for L. gibbus, and ear wax evaluated for P. ovis. The evaluation of the efficiency and the clinical assessment of the lesions was made in days 0, +3, +7, +14, +21, +28, and +35 after treatment. An efficacy of 75% and 87,5% was observed for L. gibbus in days +3 and +7 after treatment, an efficacy of 100% was observed in days +14, + 21, +28 e +35. An efficacy of 100% for the control of P. ovis was observed following day +7. The clinical lesion score of the control group remained unaltered, except for one animal which conditions worsened during experimentation. In the treated group animals, regression of the lesions was observed following day +3, and on day +21 no signal of infestation by P. ovis was present. None of the animals from the treated group presented secondary collateral effects caused by the doramectin, which proved itself as an optimal alternative for mite control in naturally infested rabbits.


2021 ◽  
Vol 205 ◽  
pp. 108881
Author(s):  
Xuedong Gao ◽  
Qiyu Huang ◽  
Xun Zhang ◽  
Yu Zhang ◽  
Xiangrui Zhu ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document