scholarly journals Palliative Care for the Late-Stage Cancer Patient During the COVID-19 Era: A Report of the Challenges

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Diana Evelyn Villa-Guillen
2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e24146-e24146
Author(s):  
Susan Miesfeldt ◽  
Twalib Athumani Ngoma ◽  
Beatrice Mushi ◽  
Mamsau Ngoma ◽  
Habiba Mahuna ◽  
...  

e24146 Background: Lack of effective end-of-life symptom control among late-stage cancer patients is a Tanzanian public health priority, calling for innovative community-based solutions. Mobile health technology holds promise; however, existing resources are limited and access to palliative care specialists is poor. This work aimed to develop a secure mobile-/web-based symptom assessment/control communication system (m-Palliative Care Link; mPCL) that extends access to a limited number of palliative care specialists (hereafter, specialists). mPCL is based on the existing patient-focused African Palliative care Outcome Scale (POS), adapted for mobile symptom assessment, and is designed to support end-of-life care coordination among specialists, patients/caregivers, and local health workers (LHWs) (i.e., user groups). Methods: In partnership with Tanzanian specialists, mPCL was developed following a user-centered design process. mPCL prototype usability testing was conducted with 5-7 participants per user group and included a combination of hands-on observations as well as collection of feedback on ease-of-use and recommendations for modifications. User input was incorporated into the mPCL prototype iteration, tested via field study with 45 late-stage cancer patients discharged from Ocean Road Cancer Institute in Dar es Salaam. A brief mPCL usability/utility survey, including closed- and open-ended survey items, was conducted with field study participants from user groups at six weeks. Results: Prototype usability test participants successfully used the application and indicated that it would be very helpful. Recommendations from usability testing included redesign data collection tools, simplify patient/caregiver application, and broaden clinical data access. Six-week field study survey data showed that a significant majority (range: 68-100%) of specialists and patients “definitely agreed” that mPCL improved patient-provider communication, symptom-based care, care access, both quality of life and care, and reduced need for travel. Nearly all specialists and patients (93% and 98%, respectively) reported that mPCL was easy to use. Conclusions: mPCL promises to assess and address the symptom-control needs of late-stage cancer patients. Due to its reliance on existing technology/personnel, mPCL should be sustainable and scalable among cancer patients and those with other chronic diseases in low resource settings.


2009 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 131-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
B.J.A. Laird ◽  
M.T. Fallon

1968 ◽  
Vol 115 (5) ◽  
pp. 743
Author(s):  
R.Robinson Baker

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (Supplement_5) ◽  
Author(s):  
E Faggian ◽  
S Favero ◽  
D Gregori ◽  
M Martinato

Abstract Background caregivers of home-cared cancer patient during palliative phase are often under psychological and physical pressure. This can lead to a low level quality of life (QoL). This study assesses the QoL of this type of caregiver, more specifically it aims to outline which factors (age, type of palliative care, amount of time spent daily with the patient) affect positively or negatively the QoL score. Methods The AC-QoL questionnaire has been completed by 25 caregivers of oncological patients in home care in north-eastern Italy. The questionnaire is made of 40 items divided into 8 subjects: support in care, choice of care, stress, economic issues, personal growth, sense of value, care skills and personal satisfaction. It has been administered during a home visit or during a follow-up phone call. Results The average score obtained is 71/120, which means a medium level of QoL. The factors which worsen the QoL are the psychological and physical stress (average score 5/15) and restrictions on caregivers' private life (average score 6/15). No significant differences in the QoL of the caregivers are related to social and personal variables (such as age, working condition, relationship with the patient, type of palliative care, amount of time spent daily with the patient). Conclusions These caregivers play a fundamental role in the management of an appropriate continuity of care and their health and QoL are important. Stress and restrictions on private life are the factors which worsen QoL, that's why nurses should evaluate the caregivers' wellbeing during home-visits. Caregivers usually feel able to offer adequate assistance if they have been adequately trained to by healthcare professionals: nurses should provide every useful tool to aloud the caregiver to feel able of and comfortable providing assistance to his/her relative trough an “empowerment process”. Key messages Caregiver of cancer patient in charge of home palliative care is fundamental for an appropriate continuity of care and his health and quality of life (QoL) are important to provide good assistance. Psycho-physical stress and restrictions on private life worsen QoL. Caregiver’s wellbeing should be assessed and useful tools should be provided by home care nurses to ease caregivers’ job.


2002 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 243-246 ◽  
Author(s):  
C Griffiths ◽  
L Norton ◽  
G Wagstaff ◽  
J Brunas-Wagstaff

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document