Transition Energies and Absorption Oscillator Strengths for ${{c}_{4}}^{\prime 1}{{{\rm{\Sigma }}}_{u}}^{+}-{{\rm{X}}}^{1}{{{\rm{\Sigma }}}_{g}}^{+}$, ${b}^{\prime 1}{{{\rm{\Sigma }}}_{u}}^{+}-{{\rm{X}}}^{1}{{{\rm{\Sigma }}}_{g}}^{+}$, and ${{c}_{5}}^{\prime 1}{{{\rm{\Sigma }}}_{u}}^{+}-{{\rm{X}}}^{1}{{{\rm{\Sigma }}}_{g}}^{+}$ Band Systems in N 2

2017 ◽  
Vol 229 (2) ◽  
pp. 19
Author(s):  
C. Lavín ◽  
A. M. Velasco
1976 ◽  
Vol 204 ◽  
pp. 940 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Roux ◽  
D. Cerny ◽  
J. D'Incan

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (05) ◽  
pp. 1850052 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. O. Alaydin ◽  
E. Ozturk ◽  
S. Elagoz

In this paper, the optical and electronic properties of asymmetric triple quantum well (ATQW) structures are studied depending on the indium concentrations while quantum well (QW) thicknesses and barrier widths are kept constant. Calculation of electronic properties are done within the framework of the effective mass approximation. The indium concentrations in left quantum well (LQW) and right quantum well (RQW) are varied in order to see the change of energy levels. Then, interband transition energies, wavelengths, oscillator strengths and radiative decay times are determined depending on barrier height. The scope of this study, for the first time in the literature, covers converged interband transition energies for the asymmetric quantum well structures.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre-Francois Loos ◽  
Filippo Lipparini ◽  
Martial Boggio-Pasqua ◽  
Anthony Scemama ◽  
Denis Jacquemin

<div><div><div><p>Following our previous work focussing on compounds containing up to 3 non-hydrogen atoms [J. Chem. Theory Comput. 14 (2018) 4360–4379], we present here highly-accurate vertical transition energies obtained for 27 molecules encompassing 4, 5, and 6 non-hydrogen atoms: acetone, acrolein, benzene, butadiene, cyanoacetylene, cyanoformaldehyde, cyanogen, cyclopentadiene, cyclopropenone, cyclopropenethione, diacetylene, furan, glyoxal, imidazole, isobutene, methylenecyclopropene, propynal, pyrazine, pyridazine, pyridine, pyrimidine, pyrrole, tetrazine, thioacetone, thiophene, thiopropynal, and triazine. To obtain these energies, we use equation-of-motion coupled cluster theory up to the highest technically possible excitation order for these systems (CC3, EOM-CCSDT, and EOM-CCSDTQ), selected configuration interaction (SCI) calculations (with tens of millions of determinants in the reference space), as well as the multiconfigurational 𝑛-electron valence state perturbation theory (NEVPT2) method. All these approaches are applied in combination with diffuse-containing atomic basis sets. For all transitions, we report at least CC3/aug-cc-pVQZ vertical excitation energies as well as CC3/aug-cc-pVTZ oscillator strengths for each dipole-allowed transition. We show that CC3 almost systematically delivers transition energies in agreement with higher-level methods with a typical deviation of ±0.04 eV, except for transitions with a dominant double excitation character where the error is much larger. The present contribution gathers a large, diverse and accurate set of more than 200 highly-accurate transition energies for states of various natures (valence, Rydberg, singlet, triplet, 𝑛 → 𝜋★, 𝜋 → 𝜋★, . . . ). We use this series of theoretical best estimates to benchmark a series of popular methods for excited state calculations: CIS(D), ADC(2), CC2, STEOM-CCSD, EOM-CCSD, CCSDR(3), CCSDT-3, CC3, as well as NEVPT2. The results of these benchmarks are compared to the available literature data.</p></div></div></div>


1996 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 279-282 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. V. Glushkov ◽  
T. N. Antonenko ◽  
N. G. Serbov ◽  
S. V. Ambrosov ◽  
V. É. Orlova ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document