scholarly journals Evaluation of community health status using data obtained by longitudinal observation of physical status of school children.

1986 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 146-153
Author(s):  
Hirofumi HIGASHI ◽  
Shinichirou SAKAMOTO ◽  
Tohru SAGARA ◽  
Shin DOUYA
2006 ◽  
Vol 163 (suppl_11) ◽  
pp. S142-S142
Author(s):  
C.J Benally ◽  
M Everett ◽  
J Moses ◽  
E Yazzie

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. 97-102
Author(s):  
Anil D Gotmare ◽  
P.G. Khot ◽  
Shraddha R. Gotmare

Gadchiroli district is a part of Vidarbha, Traibal district away from 200 KM from sub capital of Maharashtra, Nagpur, Gadchiroli is well known tribal district of vidarbha. Total forest cover of the district is around 78% of total geographic area. District has 12 blocks with 6 revenue division. It is a notified tribal district having 8.61%–81.50% tribal population in different blocks and block-wise urbanization varies from 0.00% to 37.10%. Objective: Objective of present research paper is to device tool to rank the blocks of the district according to community health status exist in blocks and accordingly assess community health status at block level in Gadchiroli district.


Author(s):  
Syed Abid Asghar ◽  
Pratibha Gupta ◽  
Mrinal R. Srivastava ◽  
J. P. Srivastava ◽  
Zeashan H. Zaidi

Background: School health is an important branch of community health. School health services is an economical and powerful means of raising community health. In school child is vulnerable to stress, tension and endangerment of group life because all children are not the same and comes from different socioeconomic and cultural background and with different immunity status. Child is quite vulnerable at this growing age and hence become easy victims of many non-communicable diseases such as dental caries, anaemia, visual and hearing defects. The objective of the study was to assess health status of primary school children in rural areas of Lucknow.Methods: The present school-based descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in the rural area of Lucknow from February to July 2015. Purposive sampling technique was adopted to select primary schools from 1st to 5th standard. All students who were present at the time of survey were included in the study. A pre-structured performa for each student was used to record information regarding anthropometric measurements, physical examination/ personal hygiene, clinical findings.Results: A total of 170 children were examined, among these 82 (48.23%) were boys and 88 (51.77%) were girls. Dental caries was the most common infirmity observed in 63 (37.05%) children with 95% CI (33.35- 40.75) and was statistically significant (p<0.05) with boys 29.27% and girls 44.31%. Anaemia were found in 65 (38.23%), boys were 32.92% and girls 43.18%. Ear discharge was seen in 17 (10%) children, boys were 6.10% and girls 13.63%.Conclusions: The common infirmity found were dental caries, anaemia and ear discharge. Effective strategy with good monitoring and evaluation is imperative in ensuring adequate and optimal implementation of school health services in primary schools in rural Lucknow.


2021 ◽  
Vol 111 (10) ◽  
pp. 1865-1873
Author(s):  
Robert L. Phillips ◽  
Norma F. Kanarek ◽  
Vickie L. Boothe

For nearly 2 decades, the Community Health Status Indicators tool reliably supplied communities with standardized, local health data and the capacity for peer-community comparisons. At the same time, it created a large community of users who shared learning in addressing local health needs. The tool survived a transition from the Health Resources and Services Administration to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention before being shuttered in 2017. While new community data tools have come online, nothing has replaced Community Health Status Indicators, and many stakeholders continue to clamor for something new that will enable local health needs assessments, peer comparisons, and creation of a community of solutions. The National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics heard from many stakeholders that they still need a replacement data source. (Am J Public Health. 2021;111(10):1865–1873. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2021.306437 )


2008 ◽  
Vol 98 (2) ◽  
pp. 209-212 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul E. Peppard ◽  
David A. Kindig ◽  
Elizabeth Dranger ◽  
Amanda Jovaag ◽  
Patrick L. Remington

1982 ◽  
Vol 72 (9) ◽  
pp. 1017-1021 ◽  
Author(s):  
C S Aneshensel ◽  
R R Frerichs ◽  
V A Clark ◽  
P A Yokopenic

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document