scholarly journals Residual disease burden in axial Spondyloarthritis and Psoriatic Arthritis patients despite low disease activity states in a multi-ethnic Asian population

2020 ◽  
pp. jrheum.200934
Author(s):  
Venice Liu ◽  
Warren Fong ◽  
Yu Heng Kwan ◽  
Ying-Ying Leung
Keyword(s):  
Psoriatic Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Axial Spondyloarthritis ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Functional Health ◽  
Mental Wellbeing ◽  
Low Disease Activity ◽  
Pain Scores

Objective To evaluate the burden of residual disease in patients with axial SpondyloArthritis (axSpA) or Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) who achieved low disease activity status. Methods We used baseline data from a clinic registry of SpA in a tertiary hospital in Singapore. For axSpA, LDA was defined as ASDAS-ESR <2.1 or BASDAI <3/10. For PsA, LDA was defined by achieving 5/7 cut-offs in the Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) or clinical Disease Activity index for Psoriatic Arthritis (cDAPSA) ≤13. Results From 262 cases of axSpA (21% women; mean ± standard deviation (SD) age 42 ± 14 years), 33% and 43% of patients achieved ASDAS-ESR and BASDAI LDA states respectively. While from 142 cases of PsA (49% women; mean ± SD age 51 ± 14 years), 35% and 63% achieved MDA and cDAPSA LDA, respectively. Both axSpA and PsA patients with LDA had pain scores range from 14.0 to 21.4/100 and fatigue scores from 3.1 to 3.6/10. Substantial burden in physical disability and mental wellbeing were observed with low physical and mental component summary of SF-36. AxSpa patients in BASDAI LDA had higher ESR and lower disability than those in ASDAS-ESR LDA. cDAPSA classified nearly twice as many PsA patients into LDA than MDA. Compared to PsA patients in MDA LDA, PsA patients in cDAPSA LDA had higher active joint counts, dactylitis, enthesitis, pain scores and patient global assessment (PtGA) Conclusion Despite being in LDA, patients with axSpA and PsA experienced substantial residual burden in pain, fatigue, poorer functional health and mental well-being.

scholarly journals Ideal target for psoriatic arthritis? Comparison of remission and low disease activity states in a real-life cohort

2017 ◽  
Vol 77 (2) ◽  
pp. 251-257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonieke J J van Mens ◽  
Marleen G H van de Sande ◽  
Arno W R van Kuijk ◽  
Dominique Baeten ◽  
Laura C Coates
Keyword(s):  
Psoriatic Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Skin Disease ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Added Value ◽  
Tender Joint Count ◽  
Low Disease Activity

BackgroundPsoriatic arthritis (PsA) recommendations state that the target of treatment should be remission or low disease activity (LDA). We used a real-life dataset to compare different potential targets.Methods250 patients with PsA considered in an acceptable disease state according to their rheumatologist were included. Targets for remission were the Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) and clinical DAPSA (cDAPSA) remission (≤4), very low disease activity (VLDA) and Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score ≤1.9. LDA targets analysed were the DAPSA ≤14, cDAPSA ≤13, minimal disease activity (MDA) and adjusted MDA targets: MDAjoints with both tender joint count (TJC) and swollen joint count (SJC) mandated, MDAskin (psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) mandated) and MDAjoints&skin with TJC, SJC and PASI mandated.ResultsComparison of the several candidate targets demonstrates that VLDA is achieved by the lowest proportion of patients and includes patients with the lowest residual disease activity compared with the other remission targets. The modified MDA measures are the most stringent targets for LDA in terms of residual disease on joints, psoriasis and enthesitis within patients achieving the target. In both remission and LDA, the inclusion of C reactive protein did not show an added value. The exclusion of a skin domain, as in the DAPSA measures, resulted in negligence of skin disease and a negative impact on the quality of life in some patients.ConclusionsThe different remission and LDA targets show us significant overlap between measures, but these measures targeting the same definition do differ in terms of allowance of residual disease. Inclusion of laboratory markers seems unnecessary, although exclusion of a skin domain may result in psoriasis not being assessed resulting in residual impactful skin disease.

scholarly journals Residual Disease Activity and Associated Factors in Psoriatic Arthritis

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (10) ◽  
pp. 1490-1495 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ennio Lubrano ◽  
Silvia Scriffignano ◽  
Fabio Massimo Perrotta
Keyword(s):  
Psoriatic Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Associated Factors ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Composite Index ◽  
Disease Activity Index ◽  
Psoriasis Area Severity Index ◽  
Low Disease Activity ◽  
Patient Reported

ObjectiveRemission or low disease activity should be the treatment target of psoriatic arthritis (PsA). However, residual disease activity (RDA) in some domains could persist. The aim of this study was to assess RDA and its associated factors in a group of patients with PsA.MethodsPatients with PsA were enrolled if they satisfied ClASsification for Psoriatic ARthritis (CASPAR) criteria with > 6 months’ followup and achieved a status of low disease activity (LDA), minimal disease activity (MDA), or remission [Disease Activity Index for PsA (DAPSA) remission or very low disease activity (VLDA)]. RDA was assessed by the percentage of patients who had, although in LDA or remission, tender and/or swollen joints > 1, Leeds Enthesitis Index > 1, Health Assessment Questionnaire > 0.5, Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) > 1, patient’s global assessment > 20, physician visual analog scale (VAS) > 20, and VAS pain > 15. Associated factors of RDA were also assessed.ResultsOf 113 enrolled patients, 78 (69%) were in MDA. Moreover, DAPSA remission was observed in 46 (40.7%) while VLDA only in 32 (28.3%) of patients with PsA. VLDA seems to be the most stringent criterion, with a minimal RDA only in the VAS physician in 1 patient (3.1%) and none in the different domains, while patients in MDA had RDA in tender joints (14.1%), VAS pain (29.4%) and PASI > 1 or body surface area (BSA) > 3% (17.9%). Of note, although patients in DAPSA remission show a very low rate of RDA in almost all domains, 12 (26%) of them show a PASI > 1 or BSA > 3%. Finally, LDA shows RDA in higher percentages, mainly in patient-reported outcomes, tender joints, and skin domain.ConclusionRDA can be recognized in patients with PsA. VLDA seems to be the most stringent composite index to identify patients in the absence of RDA.

scholarly journals Comparison of Different Remission and Low Disease Definitions in Psoriatic Arthritis and Evaluation of Their Prognostic Value

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 160-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura C. Coates ◽  
Alice B. Gottlieb ◽  
Joseph F. Merola ◽  
Caroline Boone ◽  
Annette Szumski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Psoriatic Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Skin Lesions ◽  
Tender Joint Count ◽  
Tender Joint ◽  
Clinical Trial Registration ◽  
Low Disease Activity ◽  
Link Type

Objective.There is no agreement on the optimal definitions for assessing disease state in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and some of the commonly used definitions do not include assessment of skin lesions. We investigated the performance of various definitions in patients with PsA and psoriasis.Methods.This was a posthoc analysis of data from the PRESTA study. The remission definitions analyzed were very low disease activity (VLDA) index, defined as 7/7 of the minimal disease activity (MDA) cutoffs; Disease Activity Index for PsA (DAPSA); and clinical (c-) DAPSA. The low disease activity (LDA) definitions analyzed were as follows: MDA defined as 5/7 cutoffs; MDA joint with both the tender joint count (TJC) and swollen joint count (SJC) cutoffs mandated; MDA skin where skin cutoff was mandated; MDA joint + skin where TJC, SJC, and skin cutoffs were mandated; DAPSA LDA; and cDAPSA LDA.Results.At Week 24, the proportions of patients achieving VLDA, DAPSA, and cDAPSA remission were 10%, 35%, and 37%, respectively. Of the patients achieving DAPSA and cDAPSA remission, 55% and 56%, respectively, had Psoriasis Area and Severity Index > 1. The proportions of patients achieving MDA 5/7, MDA skin, MDA joint, and MDA joint + skin were 44%, 19%, 36%, and 14%, respectively, versus 70% achieving DAPSA and cDAPSA LDA. Notable residual levels of psoriasis were observed in patients achieving the definitions that did not require skin disease control.Conclusion.VLDA and MDA definitions are more stringent than DAPSA and cDAPSA definitions for the assessment of PsA. The relevance of residual disease to patients, however, remains to be determined. [Clinical Trial registration:ClinicalTrials.govNCT00245960]

scholarly journals Remission and low disease activity in psoriatic arthritis publications: a systematic literature review with meta-analysis

Rheumatology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (8) ◽  
pp. 1818-1825 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Hagège ◽  
Elina Tan ◽  
Martine Gayraud ◽  
Bruno Fautrel ◽  
Laure Gossec ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Psoriatic Arthritis ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Systematic Literature Review ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Random Effect ◽  
Disease Activity Index ◽  
Low Disease Activity ◽  
Pooled Prevalence

Abstract Objectives Remission (REM) or low disease activity (LDA) is the treatment target in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). The objective of this study was to assess the reporting and prevalence of REM/LDA in published studies of PsA. Methods This was a systematic literature review of all clinical papers published in PubMed, EMBASE or Cochrane database in English between 2012 and 2019 in the field of PsA. Data were collected regarding reporting of REM/LDA by very low disease activity/minimal disease activity (VLDA/MDA), Disease Activity index for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA), or Disease Activity Score 28 joints (DAS28). The pooled rates of REM and LDA by each definition were calculated by random effect meta-analysis. Results In all, 258 publications (corresponding to 114 651 patients), of which 81 (31%) were randomized controlled trials, were analysed: patients’ mean age was 49.4 ( 4.4) years; with a mean disease duration of 8.5 ( 3.8) years. REM/LDA was reported in 91/258 (35.3%) publications. VLDA/MDA was used in 61/91 (67.0%) studies, DAPSA in 27/91 (29.6%) and DAS28 in 28/91 (30.7%), with 40/91 (43.9%) papers reporting several of these definitions. The pooled prevalence (lower–upper limits) of REM was 13.1% (10.9–15.4), 23.1% (16.8–30.1) and 42.1% (33.9–50.4) using VLDA, DAPSA-REM and DAS28, respectively. For LDA the pooled prevalence was 36.3% (32.3–40.5), 52.8% (41.8–63.6) and 60.4% (52.5–68.0) using MDA, DAPSA-LDA and DAS28, respectively. Conclusion REM/LDA status was reported in only1/3 of recent studies on PsA, with important variations in the frequency of these outcomes according to the definition used: 13.1–42.1% for REM, and 36.3–60.4% for LDA. This highlights the need for consensus.

Defining Low Disease Activity States in Psoriatic Arthritis using Novel Composite Disease Instruments

2015 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 371-375 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura C. Coates ◽  
Philip S. Helliwell
Keyword(s):  
Psoriatic Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Disease Activity Score ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Disease Activity Index ◽  
Substantial Agreement ◽  
Good Discrimination ◽  
Low Disease Activity ◽  
Minimal Disease ◽  
The Relationship

Objective.To explore the relationship between minimal disease activity (MDA) and the low disease activity cutoffs of the Psoriatic ArthritiS Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) and the Composite Psoriatic Disease Activity Index (CPDAI).Methods.Data from the GRAPPA (Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis) composite exercise (GRACE) study were used for these analyses. Alternative definitions of low disease activity were used with 6/7 and 7/7 of MDA items, and a criteria set mandating the 2 articular items and 3/5 alternate items (MDA-joints). Two reference questions were used as anchors: physician’s global opinion of MDA, and patient’s opinion on their disease control.Results.Substantial agreement was found between MDA, MDA-joints, PASDAS, and CPDAI. Compared to the 2 reference questions, the various definitions of low disease activity gave sensitivities that were generally worse than specificities, the latter being high (> 0.9) in most cases. Both PASDAS and CPDAI demonstrated good discrimination between the “low” and “high” disease activity states by all the MDA definitions. Using these data, with an MDA of 7/7 to define a very low disease cutoff, the corresponding values for PASDAS and CPDAI were 1.9 and 2, respectively.Conclusion.An MDA score of 7/7 is proposed as very low disease activity in psoriatic arthritis. Using this definition, the equivalent cutoffs for PASDAS and CPDAI are 1.9 and 2, respectively.

Rebound in Measures of Disease Activity and Symptoms in Corrona Registry Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis Who Discontinue Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Therapy after Achieving Low Disease Activity

2017 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 78-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leslie R. Harrold ◽  
Bradley S. Stolshek ◽  
Sabrina Rebello ◽  
David H. Collier ◽  
Alex Mutebi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Psoriatic Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor ◽  
Disease Activity Index ◽  
Tnf Inhibitor ◽  
Low Disease Activity ◽  
Patient Reports ◽  
Factor Inhibitor ◽  
Necrosis Factor

Objective.Rebound may occur in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) who discontinue TNF inhibitor (TNFi) therapy in low disease activity (LDA).Methods.Using physician and patient reports, we quantified rebound following TNFi discontinuation [defined as Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) score > 10 or TNFi restart] and time to rebound in adults with PsA in LDA (CDAI score ≤ 10) at TNFi discontinuation.Results.Rebound occurred in 73% (69/94) of patients soon after discontinuation (median time to rebound 8.0 mos, 95% CI 6.0–12.0).Conclusion.Rebound occurred frequently in patients with PsA after TNFi discontinuation. TNFi discontinuation after achieving LDA should be carefully considered.

Patient’s Global Assessment as an Outcome Measure for Psoriatic Arthritis in Clinical Practice: A Surrogate for Measuring Low Disease Activity?

2015 ◽  
Vol 42 (12) ◽  
pp. 2332-2338 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ennio Lubrano ◽  
Fabio Massimo Perrotta ◽  
Wendy J. Parsons ◽  
Antonio Marchesoni
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Psoriatic Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Global Assessment ◽  
Outcome Measure ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Disease Activity Index ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Low Disease Activity

Objective.To assess the low disease activity (LDA) in a group of patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) receiving antitumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) by using the patient’s global assessment (PtGA) in clinical practice, and to compare PtGA with minimal disease activity (MDA) and other outcome measures.Methods.Patients with PsA classified by the ClASsification for Psoriatic ARthritis (CASPAR) criteria and consecutively admitted to an outpatient clinic dedicated to biologic therapy were assessed during their routine followup. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of patients achieving a PtGA ≤ 20 at 4-, 8-, and 12-month followups. Secondary outcome measures included the proportion of patients achieving MDA and other outcome measures. Correlation of PtGA with MDA and other process and outcome measures were also performed.Results.During the period of observation, 124 patients were evaluated. PtGA ≤ 20 was achieved in 25.7% at 4 months, 48.9% at 8 months, and 65.3% at 12 months of followup. The percentage of PtGA ≤ 20 statistically improved throughout the 3 timepoint assessments and it was statistically correlated to MDA. A significant correlation with the Disease Activity index for PSoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index, and Health Assessment Questionnaire was also observed. MDA, DAPSA, and Disease Activity Score at 28 joints with C-reactive protein remission were achieved at 12 months in 64%, 36%, and 71% of patients, respectively.Conclusion.PtGA can estimate the LDA status and could be considered as a surrogate of outcome measures for the assessment of global disease activity in patients with PsA receiving anti-TNF therapy during routine clinical practice. These data suggest that PtGA might be used in outpatient settings, being a simple, reliable, and not time-consuming instrument.

scholarly journals What Should Be the Primary Target of “Treat to Target” in Psoriatic Arthritis?

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura C. Coates ◽  
Ennio Lubrano ◽  
Fabio Massimo Perrotta ◽  
Paul Emery ◽  
Philip G. Conaghan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Psoriatic Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Disease Activity Index ◽  
Inactive Disease ◽  
Treat To Target ◽  
Recent Onset ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Active Disease

Objective.Recommendations regarding “treat to target” in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) have stated that the target should be remission or inactive disease. Potential definitions include very low disease activity (VLDA), PsA Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) near remission, Disease Activity Index for PsA (DAPSA) or clinical DAPSA (cDAPSA) remission. Our aim was to investigate the proportion of patients who fulfill these definitions and how much residual active disease remained.Methods.This analysis used 2 datasets: first, trial data from the Tight Control of PsA (TICOPA) study, which included 206 patients with recent-onset (< 2 yrs) PsA receiving standard and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD); and second, an observational clinical dataset from Italy of patients receiving biological DMARD. Proportions achieving each of the 4 potential targets were calculated in each dataset and comparisons between treatment groups were performed in the TICOPA dataset. Levels of residual disease were established for key clinical domains of PsA.Results.All measures could differentiate the TICOPA trial treatment groups (p < 0.03). Lower proportions of patients fulfilled the VLDA criteria compared to DAPSA or cDAPSA remission. PASDAS results were different between the cohorts. Residual active disease was low across all definitions although higher levels were seen in DAPSA and cDAPSA compared to VLDA, particularly for psoriasis. In all measures, the proportion with elevated C-reactive protein was similar and low.Conclusion.VLDA appears the most stringent measure. It ensures that significant active arthritis, enthesitis, and psoriasis are not present, in contrast with DAPSA and PASDAS, in which composite scores can “hide” active disease in some domains.

scholarly journals Predictors of Loss of Remission and Disease Flares in Patients with Axial Spondyloarthritis Receiving Antitumor Necrosis Factor Treatment: A Retrospective Study

2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (8) ◽  
pp. 1541-1546 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ennio Lubrano ◽  
Fabio Massimo Perrotta ◽  
Maria Manara ◽  
Salvatore D’Angelo ◽  
Olga Addimanda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ankylosing Spondylitis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Axial Spondyloarthritis ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Inactive Disease ◽  
Disease Flare ◽  
Asas Criteria ◽  
Disease Reactivation ◽  
Necrosis Factor

Objective.The aim of this study was to evaluate rate and predictive factors of loss of remission and disease flare in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) receiving antitumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) treatment.Methods.In this retrospective multicenter study, patients with axSpA, according to the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis international Society (ASAS) criteria, treated with adalimumab, etanercept, or infliximab with a minimum followup of 12 months and satisfying the ASAS partial remission criteria and/or Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) inactive disease were studied. Disease flare was defined as a Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index score > 4.5 or ASDAS score > 2.5 on at least 1 occasion.Results.One hundred seventy-four patients with axSpA were studied. After a median [interquartile range (IQR)] followup of 4 years (2–6), 37 patients (21.2%) experienced a loss of remission and 28 (16.1% of the whole study group) a disease flare. Median (IQR) duration of remission in patients who lost this status was 1 year (0.625–2). Higher median erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) values, continuous nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID) use, and an ASDAS-CRP ≥ 0.8 during the remission period were significantly associated with both loss of remission and disease flare. At the multivariate analysis, continuous NSAID intake (OR 4.05, 95% CI 1.4–11.74, p = 0.010) and ESR > 15 (OR 2.90, 95% CI 1.23–6.82, p = 0.015) were the only factors predictive of disease reactivation.Conclusion.In this study, loss of remission and disease flares occurred, respectively, in about 21% and 16% of the patients with axSpA who achieved a state of remission while receiving anti-TNF therapy. Residual disease activity was associated with disease reactivation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document