The Effect of Different Forms of Water Hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) Organic Fertilizers on Leaf Growth Rate and Yield of Rape (Brassica napus)

2007 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 254-260 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Masaka ◽  
S. Ndhlovu
1993 ◽  
Vol 28 (7) ◽  
pp. 47-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isao Aoyama ◽  
Hisao Nishizaki

Water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.) Solms) grows very vigorously and has a high content of nutrients. Cultivation experiments were conducted on water hyacinth to check whether it is worth using for water purification and to obtain guiding principles for the practical use of water hyacinth grown in natural water channels or ponds. The average dry weight, nitrogen and phosphate content in the biomass were 5.0%, 2.5% and 0.57%, respectively. The growth rate of the water hyacinth was higher from May to June than in other seasons. The logarithmic regression equation between the growth rate (Y) and solar radiation (X) was expressed by Ln (Y) = 0.0042X-4.92 with a coefficient of correlation of 0.768. The relationship between the concentration of nutrients in water (X) and in water hyacinth (Y) is expressed by Y = Cmax.X/(Ks+X). The relationship between the relative growth rate and the concentration of nutrients was also expressed by the same type of equation. The relationship between a harvesting interval and the total yield of the water hyacinth within a given period was expressed by a mathematical model. It was made clear from the model that the shorter the harvesting interval was, the more the total yield of the crop increased.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 91-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jimmy Jimmy ◽  
Diah Indriani Widiputri ◽  
Paulus Gunawan

Eichhornia crassipes is well-known as water hyacinth. Water hyacinth grows rapidly in the nutrient-rich water and high light intensity places. The uncontrollable growth of water hyacinth has caused many negative impacts to the environment. For instance, interrupted water transport and decreased population of aquatic lives. The capacity of utilising water hyacinth is slower than water hyacinth growth and water hyacinth is still considered as a threat to theecosystem. This work was focused on the study of the pharmacological activity and heavy metal content of water hyacinth in Lake Cipondoh, Tangerang. Fresh water hyacinth was pre-treated through oven-drying and milling process. After that, each part of the plant was macerated by using multiple extraction method with 96% ethanol/water and three variations of sample-to-solvent ratios (1:30, 1:50, and 1:75 w/v). The result of the experiment showed thatwater hyacinth leaves produced an extract with lowest IC 50 (55.76 ± 6.73 ppm) compared toother parts. The most optimum solvent used to achieve this result was 96% ethanol/water (1:1 v/v). In order to obtain the lowest antioxidant activity, the sample to solvent ratio used was 1:50 and the heavy metal in the extract was very low. With this result, it was concluded that there is a promising opportunity to apply the water hyacinth growing in Lake Cipondoh, Tangerang as herbal medicine ingredient. Through this utilization, the overall number of water hyacinth in Indonesia can be reduced or at the least be controlled, so that the environmental problem caused by this plant can be minimized.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Kannan Kilavan Packiam ◽  
Bharani Murugesan ◽  
Pavithra Mettupalayam Kaliyannan Sundaramoorthy ◽  
Harshini Srinivasan ◽  
Keerthika Dhanasekaran

Cellulose ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iris Amanda A. Silva ◽  
Osmir Fabiano L. de Macedo ◽  
Graziele C. Cunha ◽  
Rhayza Victoria Matos Oliveira ◽  
Luciane P. C. Romão

AbstractUrea-based multi-coated slow release fertilizer was produced using water hyacinth, humic substances, and chitosan, with water rich in natural organic matter as a solvent. Elemental analysis showed that the nitrogen content of the fertilizer (FERT) was around 20%. Swelling tests demonstrated the effectiveness of the water hyacinth crosslinker, which reduced the water permeability of the material. Leaching tests showed that FERT released a very low concentration of ammonium (0.82 mg L−1), compared to the amount released from urea (43.1 mg L−1). No nitrate leaching was observed for FERT, while urea leached 13.1 mg L−1 of nitrate. In water and soil, FERT showed maximum releases after 30 and 40 days, respectively, while urea reached maxima in just 2 and 5 days, respectively. The results demonstrated the promising ability of FERT to reduce nitrogen losses, as well as to minimize environmental impacts in the soil–plant-atmosphere system and to improve the efficiency of nitrogen fertilization. Graphic abstract


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document