Risk Factors for Preoperative Opioid Use in Patients Undergoing Primary Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Orthopedics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (6) ◽  
pp. 356-360
Author(s):  
Brent J. Morris ◽  
Mihir M. Sheth ◽  
Mitzi S. Laughlin ◽  
Hussein A. Elkousy ◽  
T. Bradley Edwards
2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 235-243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zain M. Khazi ◽  
Yining Lu ◽  
Bhavik H. Patel ◽  
Jourdan M. Cancienne ◽  
Brian Werner ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 175857322110607
Author(s):  
Michelle Xiao ◽  
Daniel M Curtis ◽  
Emilie V Cheung ◽  
Michael T Freehill ◽  
Geoffrey D Abrams

Background The purpose of this investigation was to compare rates of filled opioid prescriptions and prolonged opioid use in opioid naïve patients undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) in inpatient versus outpatient settings. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted using a national insurance claims database. Inpatient and outpatient cohorts were created by identifying continuously enrolled, opioid naïve TSA patients. A greedy nearest-neighbor algorithm was used to match baseline demographic characteristics between cohorts with a 1:1 inpatient to outpatient ratio to compare the primary outcomes of filled opioid prescriptions and prolonged opioid use following surgery between cohorts. Results A total of 11,703 opioid naïve patients (mean age 72.5 ± 8.5 years, 54.5% female, 87.6% inpatient) were included for analysis. After propensity score matching (n = 1447 inpatients; n = 1447 outpatients), outpatient TSA patients were significantly more likely to fill an opioid prescription in the perioperative window compared to inpatients (82.9% versus 71.5%, p < 0.001). No significant differences in prolonged opioid use were detected (5.74% inpatient versus 6.77% outpatient; p = 0.25). Conclusions Outpatient TSA patients were more likely to fill opioid prescriptions compared to inpatient TSA patients. The quantity of opioids prescribed and rates of prolonged opioid use were similar between the cohorts. Level of evidence Therapeutic Level III.


2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 968-975 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory T. Mahony ◽  
Brian C. Werner ◽  
Brenda Chang ◽  
Brian M. Grawe ◽  
Samuel A. Taylor ◽  
...  

Orthopedics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew J. Best ◽  
Andrew B. Harris ◽  
Ankit Bansal ◽  
Eric Huish ◽  
Uma Srikumaran

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 375-389 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon C Lau ◽  
Richard Large

Background The reverse total shoulder arthroplasty has become the most common method of arthroplasty of the shoulder. The complication of acromial or scapular stress fracture deserves consideration to describe incidence and determine whether prosthetic design or patient factors act as risk factors. Methods A systematic review of the literature was performed including the EMBASE, Medline and the Cochrane Library in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Results The search returned 565 articles. After exclusion, 25 papers remained. In total, 208 fractures were reported in the literature, with an overall incidence of 5% and stress fractures were more common than post-traumatic ones; 24 fractures underwent osteosynthesis and there were nine revision arthroplasty surgeries. Outcomes worsened after fracture – whether treated with surgery or not. In patients with scapular base fractures, there was an improvement in functional outcome scores after surgery. Heterogeneous reporting of the risk factors prior to fractures, treatment methods and outcomes made recommendations weak. Discussion Acromial stress fracture after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty occurs relatively commonly but is poorly reported in the literature. It is unclear whether immobilisation, fixation or revision arthroplasty is the best treatment, although fixation may offer a better outcome. In future, reports should aim for greater consistency to allow a better understanding of this condition.


2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (12) ◽  
pp. 2145-2152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Bitzer ◽  
Jorge Rojas ◽  
Ian S. Patten ◽  
Jacob Joseph ◽  
Edward G. McFarland

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 430-439
Author(s):  
Azeem T Malik ◽  
Jonathan D Barlow ◽  
Nikhil Jain ◽  
Safdar N Khan

Introduction There has been a reported increase in the number of proximal humerus fractures being surgically managed. In an attempt to manage increasing costs associated with increasing volume, there is a need for identification of factors associated with discharge destinations. Methods The 2012–2016 American College of Surgeons—National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried using Current Procedural Terminology codes for open reduction internal fixation, hemiarthroplasty, and total shoulder arthroplasty being performed for proximal humerus fractures. Results Five hundred and seventy-six (21.5%) patients had nonhome discharge disposition. Following adjusted analysis, age > 65 years (p < 0.001), partially dependent functional health status prior to surgery(p = 0.027), inpatient surgery (p = 0.010), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade>II (p < 0.001), transfer from nursing home/chronic care facility (p < 0.001), undergoing a total shoulder arthroplasty versus open reduction internal fixation (p = 0.012), length of stay > 2 days (p < 0.001), and the occurrence of any predischarge complication (p < 0.001) were significant predictors associated with a nonhome discharge disposition. Conclusion The study identifies significant risk factors associated with a nonhome discharge and assesses clinical impact of nonhome discharge destination on postdischarge outcomes. Providers can utilize these data to preoperatively risk stratify those at an increased risk of a nonhome discharge, counsel patients on discharge expectations, and tailor a more appropriate postoperative course of care.


2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 332-343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aakash Keswani ◽  
Debbie Chi ◽  
Andrew J Lovy ◽  
Daniel A London ◽  
Paul J Cagle ◽  
...  

Background Despite increasing rates of revision total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA), there is a paucity of literature on optimizing perioperative outcomes. The purposes of this study were to identify risk factors for unplanned readmission and perioperative complications following RTSA, risk-stratify patients based on these risk factors, and assess timing of complications. Methods Bivariate and multivariate analyses of risk factors were assessed on RTSA patients from the ACS-NSQIP database from 2011 to 2015. Patients were risk-stratified and timing of severe adverse events and cause of readmission were evaluated. Results Of 809 RTSA patients, 61 suffered a perioperative complication or readmission within 30 days of discharge. Multivariate analysis identified operative time, BMI > 40, infection etiology, high white blood cell count, and low hematocrit as significant independent risk factors for 30-day complications or readmission after RTSA (p ≤ 0.05). Having at least one significant risk factor was associated with 2.71 times risk of complication or readmission within 15 days compared to having no risk factors (p < 0.001). The majority of unplanned readmission, return to the operating room, open/deep wound infection, and sepsis/septic shock occurred within two weeks of RTSA. Discussion Patients at high risk of complications and readmission after RTSA should be identified and optimized preoperatively to improve outcomes and lower costs.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 183-188
Author(s):  
Brandon E. Lung ◽  
Shrey Kanjiya ◽  
Michael Bisogno ◽  
David E. Komatsu ◽  
Edward D. Wang

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document