Endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke : device type and complications

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie Louise Bernsen
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Device Type

Endovascular Treatment in Acute Ischemic Stroke - Three Years Clinical Experience

2014 ◽  
Vol 75 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Andonova ◽  
E. Kalevska ◽  
Ch. Bachvarov ◽  
Tz. Dimitrova ◽  
M. Petkova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Clinical Experience

scholarly journals Acute reperfusion therapies for acute ischemic stroke patients with unknown time of symptom onset or in extended time windows: an individualized approach

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 175628642110211
Author(s):  
Georgios Magoufis ◽  
Apostolos Safouris ◽  
Guy Raphaeli ◽  
Odysseas Kargiotis ◽  
Klearchos Psychogios ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Symptom Onset ◽  
Time Windows ◽  
Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Treatment Algorithms ◽  
Late Presenters

Recent randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) have revolutionized acute ischemic stroke care by extending the use of intravenous thrombolysis and endovascular reperfusion therapies in time windows that have been originally considered futile or even unsafe. Both systemic and endovascular reperfusion therapies have been shown to improve outcome in patients with wake-up strokes or symptom onset beyond 4.5 h for intravenous thrombolysis and beyond 6 h for endovascular treatment; however, they require advanced neuroimaging to select stroke patients safely. Experts have proposed simpler imaging algorithms but high-quality data on safety and efficacy are currently missing. RCTs used diverse imaging and clinical inclusion criteria for patient selection during the dawn of this novel stroke treatment paradigm. After taking into consideration the dismal prognosis of nonrecanalized ischemic stroke patients and the substantial clinical benefit of reperfusion therapies in selected late presenters, we propose rescue reperfusion therapies for acute ischemic stroke patients not fulfilling all clinical and imaging inclusion criteria as an option in a subgroup of patients with clinical and radiological profiles suggesting low risk for complications, notably hemorrhagic transformation as well as local or remote parenchymal hemorrhage. Incorporating new data to treatment algorithms may seem perplexing to stroke physicians, since treatment and imaging capabilities of each stroke center may dictate diverse treatment pathways. This narrative review will summarize current data that will assist clinicians in the selection of those late presenters that will most likely benefit from acute reperfusion therapies. Different treatment algorithms are provided according to available neuroimaging and endovascular treatment capabilities.

scholarly journals Outcome of endovascular treatment within and beyond 6 h without perfusion software

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhen Jing ◽  
Hao Li ◽  
Shengming Huang ◽  
Min Guan ◽  
Yongxin Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Symptom Onset ◽  
Anterior Circulation ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

AbstractEndovascular treatment (EVT) has been accepted as the standard of care for patients with acute ischemic stroke. The aim of the present study was to compare clinical outcomes of patients who received EVT within and beyond 6 h from symptom onset to groin puncture without perfusion software in Guangdong district, China. Between March 2017 and May 2018, acute ischemic stroke patients who received EVT from 6 comprehensive stroke centers, were enrolled into the registry study. In this subgroup study, we included all patients who had acute proximal large vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation. The demographic, clinical and neuroimaging data were collected from each center. A total of 192 patients were included in this subgroup study. They were divided into two groups: group A (n = 125), within 6 h; group B (n = 67), 6–24 h from symptom onset to groin puncture. There were no substantial differences between these two groups in terms of 90 days favorable outcome (modified Rankin scale [mRS] ≤ 2, P = 0.051) and mortality (P = 0.083), and the risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage at 24 h (P = 0.425). The NIHSS (median 16, IQR12-20, group A; median 12, IQR8-18, group B; P = 0.009) and ASPECTS (median 10, IQR8-10, group A; median 9, IQR8-10, group B; P = 0.034) at baseline were higher in group A. The anesthesia method (general anesthesia, 21.3%, group A vs. 1.5% group B, P = 0.001) were also statistically different between the two groups. The NIHSS and ASPECTS were higher, and general anesthesia was also more widely used in group A. Clinical outcomes were not significantly different within 6 h versus 6–24 h from symptom onset to groin puncture in this real world study.

Effect of “drip-and-ship” and “drip-and-drive” on endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion: a single-center retrospective study

2021 ◽  
pp. 028418512110068
Author(s):  
Yu Hang ◽  
Zhen Yu Jia ◽  
Lin Bo Zhao ◽  
Yue Zhou Cao ◽  
Huang Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Primary Stroke Center ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Comprehensive Stroke Center ◽  
Stroke Center

Background Patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) caused by large vessel occlusion (LVO) were usually transferred from a primary stroke center (PSC) to a comprehensive stroke center (CSC) for endovascular treatment (drip-and-ship [DS]), while driving the doctor from a CSC to a PSC to perform a procedure is an alternative strategy (drip-and-drive [DD]). Purpose To compare the efficacy and prognosis of the two strategies. Material and Methods From February 2017 to June 2019, 62 patients with LVO received endovascular treatment via the DS and DD models and were retrospectively analyzed from the stroke alliance based on our CSC. Primary endpoint was door-to-reperfusion (DTR) time. Secondary endpoints included puncture-to-recanalization (PTR) time, modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) rates at the end of the procedure, and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 90 days. Results Forty-one patients received the DS strategy and 21 patients received the DD strategy. The DTR time was significantly longer in the DS group compared to the DD group (315.5 ± 83.8 min vs. 248.6 ± 80.0 min; P < 0.05), and PTR time was shorter (77.2 ± 35.9 min vs. 113.7 ± 69.7 min; P = 0.033) compared with the DD group. Successful recanalization (mTICI 2b/3) was achieved in 89% (36/41) of patients in the DS group and 86% (18/21) in the DD group ( P = 1.000). Favorable functional outcomes (mRS 0–2) were observed in 49% (20/41) of patients in the DS group and 71% (15/21) in the DD group at 90 days ( P = 0.089). Conclusion Compared with the DS strategy, the DD strategy showed more effective and a trend of better clinical outcomes for AIS patients with LVO.

Choice of ANesthesia for EndoVAScular Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke: Protocol for a randomized controlled (CANVAS) trial

2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (9) ◽  
pp. 991-997 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuming Peng ◽  
Yan Li ◽  
Minyu Jian ◽  
Xiaoyuan Liu ◽  
Jian Sun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Abstract 2825: History of Cancer Predicts Mortality After Acute Endovascular Treatment for Ischemic Stroke

Stroke ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 43 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Karl Meisel ◽  
Mahesh Jayaraman ◽  
Jonathan Grossberg ◽  
Anthony Kim
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Endovascular Therapy ◽  
Hospice Care ◽  
Exploratory Analysis ◽  
Endovascular Intervention ◽  
Consecutive Series ◽  
History Of ◽  
History Of Cancer

Introduction: Endovascular treatment is an emerging therapy for acute ischemic stroke. There is no clear consensus about how best to select patients that may benefit from intervention. We conducted an exploratory analysis of clinical risk factors to predict mortality after endovascular intervention in order to better understand how to improve outcomes for patients with acute ischemic stroke. Methods: We identified consecutive series of patients treated with endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke at two academic hospitals between 2005 to 2010. Key clinical data elements and clinical outcomes at the time of discharge were abstracted from medical records. We evaluated univariate and multivariable associations using logistic regression and compared mean NIH Stroke Scale between those with and without a history of cancer using the t-test. Results: We identified 88 patients who received endovascular intervention with intra-arterial tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) and/or mechanical thrombectomy. The mean age of the cohort was 68.2 (SD 16.6) and 44 (55%) were female. A total of 23 (26.1%) patients died during the index hospitalization or were discharged to hospice care. A history of cancer was documented in 20 (22.7%) patients. A history of cancer was associated with a 3.2-fold (95% CI 1.1-9.1) higher odds of mortality. This association persisted after adjusting for age greater than 80 years and hypertension (OR of 4.0, 95% CI 1.3-12). The average NIH Stroke Scale was 15.6 in those with cancer compared to 14.6 without (p=0.53). A history of cancer was not associated with parenchymal hemorrhagic transformation (OR 1.2, 95% CI 0.3-4.9), IV tPA (OR 0.5, 95% CI 0.1-2.3), a TIMI score of 2b or 3 (OR 0.5, 95% CI 0.2-1.3), or an internal carotid artery occlusion (OR 1.7, 95% CI 0.5-5.1). Conclusions: In an exploratory analysis of consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with endovascular therapy, a history of cancer was strongly associated with significantly increased odds of mortality. One possible explanation could be that patients with cancer may have earlier withdrawal of care but the reasons for this observed association are unclear. Further investigation is necessary to verify and explain the reasons for this observation in order to improve outcomes for acute ischemic stroke patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document